Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:37 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Is to miss the FR boat to meet certain doom?
- VeeD101
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:49 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Not at all. But given my 3.7 gpa, I think I'm either going to FR or be dinged.whereskyle wrote:Is to miss the FR boat to meet certain doom?
-
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 1:12 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
<------ 3.4x and accepted. Stay positive. Berkeley might decide they like you for a number of reasons.Not at all. But given my 3.7 gpa, I think I'm either going to FR or be dinged.
- VeeD101
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:49 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Congrats! I am hopeful, just in a very realistic way hahaWhiskeynCoke wrote:<------ 3.4x and accepted. Stay positive. Berkeley might decide they like you for a number of reasons.Not at all. But given my 3.7 gpa, I think I'm either going to FR or be dinged.
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
VeeD101 wrote:Not at all. But given my 3.7 gpa, I think I'm either going to FR or be dinged.whereskyle wrote:Is to miss the FR boat to meet certain doom?
I am a 3.7 admit! Don't give up hope!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
They let my numbers twin in and not me?!WhiskeynCoke wrote:<------ 3.4x and accepted. Stay positive. Berkeley might decide they like you for a number of reasons.Not at all. But given my 3.7 gpa, I think I'm either going to FR or be dinged.

-
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 8:34 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
same gpa but UR still. LSAT? >170?WhiskeynCoke wrote:<------ 3.4x and accepted. Stay positive. Berkeley might decide they like you for a number of reasons.Not at all. But given my 3.7 gpa, I think I'm either going to FR or be dinged.
- jwthurman
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 8:42 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
176; 3.85
No change since going under review on 11/21
No change since going under review on 11/21
-
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:37 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Speechless.jwthurman wrote:176; 3.85
No change since going under review on 11/21
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:38 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I know Berkeley is competitive, but wouldn't you assume "176; 3.85" not in yet is a yield issue? Honestly this process is so weird.
I am under FR after a 24 hour delay; better than a rejection, but can't help feeling like somehow there's something I should have done to get myself over the finish line to "admit" in the last day! FR, be kind...
I am under FR after a 24 hour delay; better than a rejection, but can't help feeling like somehow there's something I should have done to get myself over the finish line to "admit" in the last day! FR, be kind...
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Berkeley doesn't get enough credit for actually being holistic. More so than Stanford IMO.rabbitrabbit wrote:I know Berkeley is competitive, but wouldn't you assume "176; 3.85" not in yet is a yield issue? Honestly this process is so weird.
I am under FR after a 24 hour delay; better than a rejection, but can't help feeling like somehow there's something I should have done to get myself over the finish line to "admit" in the last day! FR, be kind...
Not much of a pattern here: http://berkeley.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/1112/
- CO2016YEAH
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:42 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I agree with the poster above. I don't think Berkeley is particularly concerned with YP. If they want you and think that you will be a good fit then they'll admit you.rabbitrabbit wrote:I know Berkeley is competitive, but wouldn't you assume "176; 3.85" not in yet is a yield issue? Honestly this process is so weird.
I am under FR after a 24 hour delay; better than a rejection, but can't help feeling like somehow there's something I should have done to get myself over the finish line to "admit" in the last day! FR, be kind...
If they did "yp" those numbers, I think it would be because they don't anticipate that Berkeley would be a fit holistically, not merely in anticipation that the applicant is bound to attend YSHCCN simply because his/her numbers are strong enough to gain admission.
- cwid1391
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I'm curious to see how Berkeley's attitude this cycle is going to affect their rankings next year. It seems like Penn and UVA are more concerned than ever about letting in above-medians only, whereas Berkeley has gone more rogue than usual. It will be interesting to see if they're all at 7 next year.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
cwid1391 wrote:I'm curious to see how Berkeley's attitude this cycle is going to affect their rankings next year. It seems like Penn and UVA are more concerned than ever about letting in above-medians only, whereas Berkeley has gone more rogue than usual. It will be interesting to see if they're all at 7 next year.
Examples of how Berkeley has gone "more rogue" this cycle? Most of what I ever see on here are 3.8+/170+ types getting in.
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
BigZuck wrote:cwid1391 wrote:I'm curious to see how Berkeley's attitude this cycle is going to affect their rankings next year. It seems like Penn and UVA are more concerned than ever about letting in above-medians only, whereas Berkeley has gone more rogue than usual. It will be interesting to see if they're all at 7 next year.
Examples of how Berkeley has gone "more rogue" this cycle? Most of what I ever see on here are 3.8+/170+ types getting in.
Agreed. There have been some exceptions (myself included) but I feel like Berk knows that if anyone wants to practice in SF/CA then they have to either get into Stanford or go with Berk, or hope to be in top 25% (?) at USC/UCLA. They have the upper hand since they're in such a competitive market. (Could be wrong, but UVA doesn't really stand a chance against HYS in DC, its market, and Penn is the only one in Philly, which doesn't seem all that sought-after). Just my .02. Probably why they give so little $, too- they know people will pay sticker for that opportunity.
- cwid1391
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
The fact that I got in quickly to B and got WL at the other two may be influencing my opinion, but they have been admitting significantly more <170 applicants this cycle than VP. This is especially notable, I think, since most other schools have been turning less holistic with the drop in applicants.BigZuck wrote: Examples of how Berkeley has gone "more rogue" this cycle? Most of what I ever see on here are 3.8+/170+ types getting in.
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
If only there is a website where we could check this...cwid1391 wrote:The fact that I got in quickly to B and got WL at the other two may be influencing my opinion, but they have been admitting significantly more <170 applicants this cycle than VP. This is especially notable, I think, since most other schools have been turning less holistic with the drop in applicants.BigZuck wrote: Examples of how Berkeley has gone "more rogue" this cycle? Most of what I ever see on here are 3.8+/170+ types getting in.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- goden
- Posts: 2756
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 12:52 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 2&t=202906
At first blush this seems to support BigZuck's argument.
At first blush this seems to support BigZuck's argument.
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
goden wrote:http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 2&t=202906
At first blush this seems to support BigZuck's argument.
Not to play devil's advocate (LOLZ IM GONNA BE A GUNNER) but I always wonder if there are accepted students out there that are below medians/balancing out TLSers high numbers and aren't aware of TLS/LSN. Like some happier, internet-free alternate universe where these people have real hobbies and social lives.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:38 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
And just to clarify, I am not !176; 3.85"! (Unfortunately.) Was referencing poster above.
-
- Posts: 369
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:23 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Faculty Review email is out. Just received it.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Jaqen
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Boom email.
Dear Jaqen,
I write to inform you that your application to Berkeley Law School has passed an initial administrative review and has been selected for further consideration by the Faculty Admissions Committee. The Committee will begin deliberation on your application on January 25. We anticipate a final decision will be reached on or around February 15.
Thank you for your patience.
Edward Tom
Dean of Admissions
- Jaqen
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Sup fellow email stalker.WhatOurBodiesAreFor wrote:Faculty Review email is out. Just received it.

- amsong
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:42 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
My friend's reaction to this email:
"It is like a coming soon advertisement for an exciting movie!!!"
"It is like a coming soon advertisement for an exciting movie!!!"
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Oh good... That means all the dings are going out tomorrow at 5 pm PST
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login