Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
ryguy

Bronze
Posts: 328
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:13 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by ryguy » Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:16 pm

IN at Fordham via status checker!!! Happpiiieee

Zara

Bronze
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:37 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by Zara » Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:39 pm

In at Northwestern. They sent me 4 emails in a row to announce it. Sent my application in early january.

ENGINEERD

Bronze
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:15 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by ENGINEERD » Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:56 am

Waitlisted at BU via email (kinda expected). Waitlisted at Arizona via status checker (A bit confused on this one).

manwitaplan

New
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by manwitaplan » Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:11 am

cardinalandgold wrote:In at Emory via snail mail.

when did you send ur app?

User avatar
Relientkate

Bronze
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 6:42 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by Relientkate » Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:53 am

ENGINEERD wrote:Waitlisted at BU via email (kinda expected). Waitlisted at Arizona via status checker (A bit confused on this one).
#s?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
bloodonthetracks

Bronze
Posts: 421
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:28 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by bloodonthetracks » Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:01 pm

neimanmarxist wrote:
bloodonthetracks wrote:in at penn via phone
congrats ! when did you go complete/ UR?

In other news in at NU via e-mail today.
i don't have all the info in front of me right now, but i went UR about three weeks ago

User avatar
cardinalandgold

Silver
Posts: 554
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:00 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by cardinalandgold » Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:16 pm

Finally complete at Cornell! And in review at UW!

ENGINEERD

Bronze
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:15 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by ENGINEERD » Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:32 pm

Relientkate wrote:
ENGINEERD wrote:Waitlisted at BU via email (kinda expected). Waitlisted at Arizona via status checker (A bit confused on this one).
#s?
167/3.2

User avatar
Genki

Bronze
Posts: 246
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:04 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by Genki » Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:19 pm

Hold at Columbia.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


manwitaplan

New
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by manwitaplan » Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:26 pm

Genki wrote:Hold at Columbia.
when did you apply to Columbia?

User avatar
tallboone

Bronze
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 12:27 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by tallboone » Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:26 pm

Lonagan wrote:On hold at case Western. I'm thinking YP at 2.8x / 171. At any rate they need to offer me a full ride to get me to think about it, so likely withdrawing.
YP with a C+ college average? This is the stuff that drives me nuts on TLS.

User avatar
Panther7

Bronze
Posts: 454
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:34 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by Panther7 » Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:01 pm

tallboone wrote:
Lonagan wrote:On hold at case Western. I'm thinking YP at 2.8x / 171. At any rate they need to offer me a full ride to get me to think about it, so likely withdrawing.
YP with a C+ college average? This is the stuff that drives me nuts on TLS.
well, Case accepted me with a 2.6/166 and gave me a scholly, so yeah, it's probably YP.

Zara

Bronze
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:37 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by Zara » Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:53 pm

scholarship at vanderbilt for $81,000 via snail mail.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Lonagan

Bronze
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:03 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by Lonagan » Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:40 pm

tallboone wrote:
Lonagan wrote:On hold at case Western. I'm thinking YP at 2.8x / 171. At any rate they need to offer me a full ride to get me to think about it, so likely withdrawing.
YP with a C+ college average? This is the stuff that drives me nuts on TLS.
Several T20 admits + scholarships lends credence to my hunch. Have fun going crazy though.

User avatar
ryguy

Bronze
Posts: 328
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:13 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by ryguy » Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:46 pm

Akron University post card. "There still is time!!!"

User avatar
traehekat

Gold
Posts: 3188
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by traehekat » Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:48 pm

Lonagan wrote:
tallboone wrote:
Lonagan wrote:On hold at case Western. I'm thinking YP at 2.8x / 171. At any rate they need to offer me a full ride to get me to think about it, so likely withdrawing.
YP with a C+ college average? This is the stuff that drives me nuts on TLS.
Several T20 admits + scholarships lends credence to my hunch. Have fun going crazy though.
Pwned. Some people underestimate just how valuable a 170+ LSAT is. There are plenty of folks with a 3.5+ GPA, so few with 170+ (although TLS may make it seem otherwise).

User avatar
MF248

Bronze
Posts: 229
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 12:25 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by MF248 » Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:16 pm

traehekat wrote:
Lonagan wrote:
tallboone wrote:
Lonagan wrote:On hold at case Western. I'm thinking YP at 2.8x / 171. At any rate they need to offer me a full ride to get me to think about it, so likely withdrawing.
YP with a C+ college average? This is the stuff that drives me nuts on TLS.
Several T20 admits + scholarships lends credence to my hunch. Have fun going crazy though.
Pwned. Some people underestimate just how valuable a 170+ LSAT is. There are plenty of folks with a 3.5+ GPA, so few with 170+ (although TLS may make it seem otherwise).
why does everyone assume it has to be YP & that a school just may not be all that into you?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Lonagan

Bronze
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:03 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by Lonagan » Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:21 pm

Because it's a numbers game.

User avatar
Genki

Bronze
Posts: 246
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:04 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by Genki » Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:27 pm

manwitaplan wrote:
Genki wrote:Hold at Columbia.
when did you apply to Columbia?
Sent in my app on 01/04

User avatar
traehekat

Gold
Posts: 3188
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by traehekat » Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:33 pm

MF248 wrote:why does everyone assume it has to be YP & that a school just may not be all that into you?
Eh, it is a bit hard to tell in Lonagan's case because he/she is a splitter, but generally if you have the numbers you should be in. If you aren't, it is probably either YP, criminal record, applied too late, or a massive application mistake.

User avatar
MF248

Bronze
Posts: 229
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 12:25 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by MF248 » Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:35 pm

traehekat wrote:
MF248 wrote:why does everyone assume it has to be YP & that a school just may not be all that into you?
Eh, it is a bit hard to tell in Lonagan's case because he/she is a splitter, but generally if you have the numbers you should be in. If you aren't, it is probably either YP, criminal record, applied too late, or a massive application mistake.
If someone is over both 75%'s I'm fine with people calling YP. but if they're a splitter, myself included, I don't really know if they have the right to shout YP.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
traehekat

Gold
Posts: 3188
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by traehekat » Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:53 pm

MF248 wrote:
traehekat wrote:
MF248 wrote:why does everyone assume it has to be YP & that a school just may not be all that into you?
Eh, it is a bit hard to tell in Lonagan's case because he/she is a splitter, but generally if you have the numbers you should be in. If you aren't, it is probably either YP, criminal record, applied too late, or a massive application mistake.
If someone is over both 75%'s I'm fine with people calling YP. but if they're a splitter, myself included, I don't really know if they have the right to shout YP.
Like I said, hard to tell in the case of a splitter, but he/she DID mention they have several T20 admits and scholarships, so a hold from Case is a little surprising.

User avatar
thickfreakness

Silver
Posts: 1055
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 4:39 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by thickfreakness » Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:07 am

MF248 wrote:
traehekat wrote:
MF248 wrote:why does everyone assume it has to be YP & that a school just may not be all that into you?
Eh, it is a bit hard to tell in Lonagan's case because he/she is a splitter, but generally if you have the numbers you should be in. If you aren't, it is probably either YP, criminal record, applied too late, or a massive application mistake.
If someone is over both 75%'s I'm fine with people calling YP. but if they're a splitter, myself included, I don't really know if they have the right to shout YP.
+1 here.

User avatar
taw856

Bronze
Posts: 212
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:05 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by taw856 » Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:42 am

MF248 wrote:If someone is over both 75%'s I'm fine with people calling YP. but if they're a splitter, myself included, I don't really know if they have the right to shout YP.
--ImageRemoved--

You're probably right in most cases, but just had to drag out American's graph for this year given the discussion.

User avatar
traehekat

Gold
Posts: 3188
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Post by traehekat » Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:52 am

Oh man, haha, look at that heinous yield protection right there.

164 = auto admit.
166+ = auto waitlist.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”