Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants Forum
- ryguy

- Posts: 328
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
IN at Fordham via status checker!!! Happpiiieee
-
Zara

- Posts: 200
- Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:37 am
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
In at Northwestern. They sent me 4 emails in a row to announce it. Sent my application in early january.
-
ENGINEERD

- Posts: 241
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:15 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
Waitlisted at BU via email (kinda expected). Waitlisted at Arizona via status checker (A bit confused on this one).
-
manwitaplan

- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
cardinalandgold wrote:In at Emory via snail mail.
when did you send ur app?
- Relientkate

- Posts: 118
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 6:42 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
#s?ENGINEERD wrote:Waitlisted at BU via email (kinda expected). Waitlisted at Arizona via status checker (A bit confused on this one).
- bloodonthetracks

- Posts: 421
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:28 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
i don't have all the info in front of me right now, but i went UR about three weeks agoneimanmarxist wrote:congrats ! when did you go complete/ UR?bloodonthetracks wrote:in at penn via phone
In other news in at NU via e-mail today.
- cardinalandgold

- Posts: 554
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:00 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
Finally complete at Cornell! And in review at UW!
-
ENGINEERD

- Posts: 241
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:15 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
167/3.2Relientkate wrote:#s?ENGINEERD wrote:Waitlisted at BU via email (kinda expected). Waitlisted at Arizona via status checker (A bit confused on this one).
- Genki

- Posts: 246
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:04 am
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
Hold at Columbia.
-
manwitaplan

- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
when did you apply to Columbia?Genki wrote:Hold at Columbia.
- tallboone

- Posts: 298
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 12:27 am
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
YP with a C+ college average? This is the stuff that drives me nuts on TLS.Lonagan wrote:On hold at case Western. I'm thinking YP at 2.8x / 171. At any rate they need to offer me a full ride to get me to think about it, so likely withdrawing.
- Panther7

- Posts: 454
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:34 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
well, Case accepted me with a 2.6/166 and gave me a scholly, so yeah, it's probably YP.tallboone wrote:YP with a C+ college average? This is the stuff that drives me nuts on TLS.Lonagan wrote:On hold at case Western. I'm thinking YP at 2.8x / 171. At any rate they need to offer me a full ride to get me to think about it, so likely withdrawing.
-
Zara

- Posts: 200
- Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:37 am
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
scholarship at vanderbilt for $81,000 via snail mail.
- Lonagan

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:03 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
Several T20 admits + scholarships lends credence to my hunch. Have fun going crazy though.tallboone wrote:YP with a C+ college average? This is the stuff that drives me nuts on TLS.Lonagan wrote:On hold at case Western. I'm thinking YP at 2.8x / 171. At any rate they need to offer me a full ride to get me to think about it, so likely withdrawing.
- ryguy

- Posts: 328
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
Akron University post card. "There still is time!!!"
- traehekat

- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
Pwned. Some people underestimate just how valuable a 170+ LSAT is. There are plenty of folks with a 3.5+ GPA, so few with 170+ (although TLS may make it seem otherwise).Lonagan wrote:Several T20 admits + scholarships lends credence to my hunch. Have fun going crazy though.tallboone wrote:YP with a C+ college average? This is the stuff that drives me nuts on TLS.Lonagan wrote:On hold at case Western. I'm thinking YP at 2.8x / 171. At any rate they need to offer me a full ride to get me to think about it, so likely withdrawing.
- MF248

- Posts: 229
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 12:25 am
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
why does everyone assume it has to be YP & that a school just may not be all that into you?traehekat wrote:Pwned. Some people underestimate just how valuable a 170+ LSAT is. There are plenty of folks with a 3.5+ GPA, so few with 170+ (although TLS may make it seem otherwise).Lonagan wrote:Several T20 admits + scholarships lends credence to my hunch. Have fun going crazy though.tallboone wrote:YP with a C+ college average? This is the stuff that drives me nuts on TLS.Lonagan wrote:On hold at case Western. I'm thinking YP at 2.8x / 171. At any rate they need to offer me a full ride to get me to think about it, so likely withdrawing.
- Lonagan

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:03 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
Because it's a numbers game.
- Genki

- Posts: 246
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:04 am
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
Sent in my app on 01/04manwitaplan wrote:when did you apply to Columbia?Genki wrote:Hold at Columbia.
- traehekat

- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
Eh, it is a bit hard to tell in Lonagan's case because he/she is a splitter, but generally if you have the numbers you should be in. If you aren't, it is probably either YP, criminal record, applied too late, or a massive application mistake.MF248 wrote:why does everyone assume it has to be YP & that a school just may not be all that into you?
- MF248

- Posts: 229
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 12:25 am
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
If someone is over both 75%'s I'm fine with people calling YP. but if they're a splitter, myself included, I don't really know if they have the right to shout YP.traehekat wrote:Eh, it is a bit hard to tell in Lonagan's case because he/she is a splitter, but generally if you have the numbers you should be in. If you aren't, it is probably either YP, criminal record, applied too late, or a massive application mistake.MF248 wrote:why does everyone assume it has to be YP & that a school just may not be all that into you?
- traehekat

- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
Like I said, hard to tell in the case of a splitter, but he/she DID mention they have several T20 admits and scholarships, so a hold from Case is a little surprising.MF248 wrote:If someone is over both 75%'s I'm fine with people calling YP. but if they're a splitter, myself included, I don't really know if they have the right to shout YP.traehekat wrote:Eh, it is a bit hard to tell in Lonagan's case because he/she is a splitter, but generally if you have the numbers you should be in. If you aren't, it is probably either YP, criminal record, applied too late, or a massive application mistake.MF248 wrote:why does everyone assume it has to be YP & that a school just may not be all that into you?
- thickfreakness

- Posts: 1055
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 4:39 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
+1 here.MF248 wrote:If someone is over both 75%'s I'm fine with people calling YP. but if they're a splitter, myself included, I don't really know if they have the right to shout YP.traehekat wrote:Eh, it is a bit hard to tell in Lonagan's case because he/she is a splitter, but generally if you have the numbers you should be in. If you aren't, it is probably either YP, criminal record, applied too late, or a massive application mistake.MF248 wrote:why does everyone assume it has to be YP & that a school just may not be all that into you?
- taw856

- Posts: 212
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:05 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
--ImageRemoved--MF248 wrote:If someone is over both 75%'s I'm fine with people calling YP. but if they're a splitter, myself included, I don't really know if they have the right to shout YP.
You're probably right in most cases, but just had to drag out American's graph for this year given the discussion.
- traehekat

- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm
Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants
Oh man, haha, look at that heinous yield protection right there.
164 = auto admit.
166+ = auto waitlist.
164 = auto admit.
166+ = auto waitlist.