doesn't skidmore fit in there somewhere toocrackberry wrote:In NYC, if you were rich, went to private school, did a lot of coke and had a 2.0-2.5, you went to Trinity or Hamilton.CardinalRules wrote:It was the finishing school for the annoying dumbasses at my own private school too. When some lazy slob walked past, I used to think "perfect for Trinity."crackberry wrote: There's also the Trinity College for the dregs of the NYC private school system in Connecticut.
Stanford 2010!!! Forum
- Lmao Zedong
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:10 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
-
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
crackberry wrote:In NYC, if you were rich, went to private school, did a lot of coke and had a 2.0-2.5, you went to Trinity or Hamilton.CardinalRules wrote:It was the finishing school for the annoying dumbasses at my own private school too. When some lazy slob walked past, I used to think "perfect for Trinity."crackberry wrote: There's also the Trinity College for the dregs of the NYC private school system in Connecticut.
Haha. I remember refusing to get out of the car when we visited Trinity during my New England college-visiting trip before applying to undergrad. It was so obviously prepjock heaven.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Yes, that too.Lmao Zedong wrote:doesn't skidmore fit in there somewhere toocrackberry wrote:In NYC, if you were rich, went to private school, did a lot of coke and had a 2.0-2.5, you went to Trinity or Hamilton.
Yeah but they are BAD jocks. Their sports teams suck.BenJ wrote:Haha. I remember refusing to get out of the car when we visited Trinity during my New England college-visiting trip before applying to undergrad. It was so obviously prepjock heaven.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
They're not really jocks but the kids who couldn't make it from JV to Varsity but insisted that they were super athletes and sports experts anyway.crackberry wrote:Yes, that too.Lmao Zedong wrote:doesn't skidmore fit in there somewhere toocrackberry wrote:In NYC, if you were rich, went to private school, did a lot of coke and had a 2.0-2.5, you went to Trinity or Hamilton.Yeah but they are BAD jocks. Their sports teams suck.BenJ wrote:Haha. I remember refusing to get out of the car when we visited Trinity during my New England college-visiting trip before applying to undergrad. It was so obviously prepjock heaven.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
That's almost exactly right. They were mediocre athletes at NYC private schools — not exactly feeder schools to the USCs and UNCs (and Stanfords) of the world.CardinalRules wrote:They're not really jocks but the kids who couldn't make it from JV to Varsity but insisted that they were super athletes and sports experts anyway.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I know. My undergrad is in NESCAC, too.crackberry wrote:Yeah but they are BAD jocks. Their sports teams suck.BenJ wrote:Haha. I remember refusing to get out of the car when we visited Trinity during my New England college-visiting trip before applying to undergrad. It was so obviously prepjock heaven.
- Lmao Zedong
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:10 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
yeah, of note here also is that if you're an average student but a good athlete you can get your way to the ivies paved through athletic recruitmentCardinalRules wrote:They're not really jocks but the kids who couldn't make it from JV to Varsity but insisted that they were super athletes and sports experts anyway.crackberry wrote:Yes, that too.Lmao Zedong wrote:doesn't skidmore fit in there somewhere toocrackberry wrote:In NYC, if you were rich, went to private school, did a lot of coke and had a 2.0-2.5, you went to Trinity or Hamilton.Yeah but they are BAD jocks. Their sports teams suck.BenJ wrote:Haha. I remember refusing to get out of the car when we visited Trinity during my New England college-visiting trip before applying to undergrad. It was so obviously prepjock heaven.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I have a number of friends who did just that. Basketball players at Harvard, runners at Penn, etc.Lmao Zedong wrote:yeah, of note here also is that if you're an average student but a good athlete you can get your way to the ivies paved through athletic recruitment
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I did that, actually. Columbia for UG. Didn't attend.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
+1. They became former friends when they did that.crackberry wrote:I have a number of friends who did just that. Basketball players at Harvard, runners at Penn, etc.Lmao Zedong wrote:yeah, of note here also is that if you're an average student but a good athlete you can get your way to the ivies paved through athletic recruitment
- englawyer
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:57 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
why? who is to say that SAT scores are much more reflective of future success than athletic prowess? in fact, many employers prefer top athletes when they hire new employees.CardinalRules wrote:+1. They became former friends when they did that.crackberry wrote:I have a number of friends who did just that. Basketball players at Harvard, runners at Penn, etc.Lmao Zedong wrote:yeah, of note here also is that if you're an average student but a good athlete you can get your way to the ivies paved through athletic recruitment
- Lmao Zedong
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:10 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
pretty harsh, no? doesn't seem like our place to pass judgment if the school feels that the person in question will make a worthwhile overall contribution as a student/athleteCardinalRules wrote:+1. They became former friends when they did that.crackberry wrote:I have a number of friends who did just that. Basketball players at Harvard, runners at Penn, etc.Lmao Zedong wrote:yeah, of note here also is that if you're an average student but a good athlete you can get your way to the ivies paved through athletic recruitment
the only time this bothers me is when someone is recruited to a school to play a sport, then promptly quits that sport, which I've heard a few cases of
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
That's actually somewhat true, interestingly enough. Probably because athletes are often very personable, charismatic and team-oriented, while bookworms can be socially awkward and better solo-workers than they are team players.englawyer wrote:why? who is to say that SAT scores are much more reflective of future success than athletic prowess? in fact, many employers prefer top athletes when they hire new employees.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
They were pretty obnoxious about telling me how much superior they were. It's all water under the dam at this point, obviously; I don't care about UG admissions patterns at all now.englawyer wrote:why? who is to say that SAT scores are much more reflective of future success than athletic prowess? in fact, many employers prefer top athletes when they hire new employees.CardinalRules wrote:+1. They became former friends when they did that.crackberry wrote:I have a number of friends who did just that. Basketball players at Harvard, runners at Penn, etc.Lmao Zedong wrote:yeah, of note here also is that if you're an average student but a good athlete you can get your way to the ivies paved through athletic recruitment
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Eh, I sacrificed a lot in the GPA department in high school for sports. I don't think it should be held against anyone as long as they make the most of their college experience.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
This was the case for some of them; it seemed unfair to me.Lmao Zedong wrote:pretty harsh, no? doesn't seem like our place to pass judgment if the school feels that the person in question will make a worthwhile overall contribution as a student/athleteCardinalRules wrote:+1. They became former friends when they did that.crackberry wrote:I have a number of friends who did just that. Basketball players at Harvard, runners at Penn, etc.Lmao Zedong wrote:yeah, of note here also is that if you're an average student but a good athlete you can get your way to the ivies paved through athletic recruitment
the only time this bothers me is when someone is recruited to a school to play a sport, then promptly quits that sport, which I've heard a few cases of
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I didn't mean to cause offense to anyone here with the comment; sorry to have hurt anyone's feelings.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 814
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:19 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Lmao Zedong wrote: pretty harsh, no? doesn't seem like our place to pass judgment if the school feels that the person in question will make a worthwhile overall contribution as a student/athlete
the only time this bothers me is when someone is recruited to a school to play a sport, then promptly quits that sport, which I've heard a few cases of
I know someone who did this at Yale (who was not even close to smart enough to get in on his own)... it really bothered me.
- englawyer
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:57 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
that is kind of worrisome. thankfully they lose the "athlete bonus" when it comes to recruiting if it is any consolation. also, this is for the most part true for the ivies only. other schools give scholarships that are forfeited if you stop playing on the team, whereas the ivy league schools do not offer athletic scholarships.maggiebre wrote:Lmao Zedong wrote: pretty harsh, no? doesn't seem like our place to pass judgment if the school feels that the person in question will make a worthwhile overall contribution as a student/athlete
the only time this bothers me is when someone is recruited to a school to play a sport, then promptly quits that sport, which I've heard a few cases of
I know someone who did this at Yale (who was not even close to smart enough to get in on his own)... it really bothered me.
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
tbf, if you're serious about athletics, you don't go to a great academic school unless it's Stanford.
- mochafury
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:32 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
So...if 3.8/177 gets you dinged at SLS...guess I'll be expecting my letter? I live in NY, so looks like I'm waiting on the postman.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Do you have a 177 / 3.8? If so, you'll need to drop about seven points on your LSAT before STTTanford will consider you.mochafury wrote:So...if 3.8/177 gets you dinged at SLS...guess I'll be expecting my letter? I live in NY, so looks like I'm waiting on the postman.
-
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
ftfy.Kronk wrote:Do you have a 177 / 3.8? If so, you'll need to drop [strike]about[/strike] exactly seven points on your LSAT before STTTanford will consider you.mochafury wrote:So...if 3.8/177 gets you dinged at SLS...guess I'll be expecting my letter? I live in NY, so looks like I'm waiting on the postman.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Next time, just skip answering the last logic game.Kronk wrote:Do you have a 177 / 3.8? If so, you'll need to drop about seven points on your LSAT before STTTanford will consider you.mochafury wrote:So...if 3.8/177 gets you dinged at SLS...guess I'll be expecting my letter? I live in NY, so looks like I'm waiting on the postman.

- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Fixed.Kronk wrote:Do you have a 177 / 3.8? If so, you'll need to drop about seven (or eight) points on your LSAT before STTTanford will consider you.mochafury wrote:So...if 3.8/177 gets you dinged at SLS...guess I'll be expecting my letter? I live in NY, so looks like I'm waiting on the postman.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login