Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
FYI: I added additional analysis in the Harvard spreadsheet specific to JS1's. It shows the percentage of TLSers who have received one, as well as average and minimum LSAT and GPA metrics.
- jingosaur
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
TLS is the most unrepresentative sample in the history of sampling.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
+1 Sadly that makes these spreadsheets not as useful as they could be...jingosaur wrote:TLS is the most unrepresentative sample in the history of sampling.
Although that might make the "days until..." numbers more relevant.
- neprep
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I would pay good money to LSAC if it can tell me the equivalent of the data in the spreadsheets for all applicants.lawschool22 wrote:+1 Sadly that makes these spreadsheets not as useful as they could be...jingosaur wrote:TLS is the most unrepresentative sample in the history of sampling.
- 2x2Matrix
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 11:37 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
we switched the spreadsheet?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:09 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I'm sure this was already covered somewhere, but what constitutes "Below Average", "Average", or "Above Average" softs?
And apologies, my ignorance is showing
And apologies, my ignorance is showing

-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
we have no general consensus and there was quite the discussion on it. HOWEVER if you look at the "Q&A with a former admissions officer" thread in the admissions forum i think some thoughts are in there.tls2175 wrote:I'm sure this was already covered somewhere, but what constitutes "Below Average", "Average", or "Above Average" softs?
And apologies, my ignorance is showing
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:09 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Thanks scoobers. Personal note, I've been trolling this thread for a while and I just want to say I love your avatar!scoobers wrote:we have no general consensus and there was quite the discussion on it. HOWEVER if you look at the "Q&A with a former admissions officer" thread in the admissions forum i think some thoughts are in there.tls2175 wrote:I'm sure this was already covered somewhere, but what constitutes "Below Average", "Average", or "Above Average" softs?
And apologies, my ignorance is showing
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
tls2175 wrote:Thanks scoobers. Personal note, I've been trolling this thread for a while and I just want to say I love your avatar!scoobers wrote:we have no general consensus and there was quite the discussion on it. HOWEVER if you look at the "Q&A with a former admissions officer" thread in the admissions forum i think some thoughts are in there.tls2175 wrote:I'm sure this was already covered somewhere, but what constitutes "Below Average", "Average", or "Above Average" softs?
And apologies, my ignorance is showing

- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Welp, looks like 48% of us were incorrect thus far.
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
wtrc wrote:Welp, looks like 48% of us were incorrect thus far.

-
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by 062914123 on Thu Jul 03, 2014 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jingosaur
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
48% of the people ITT are influenced by confirmation bias.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1473
- Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:34 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by NoDayButToday on Sat Mar 26, 2016 7:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
lol at the bolded partNoDayButToday wrote:Sorry to be ignorant, but I think law school admissions has more acronyms than the federal government. What does ITT mean? I see that a lot in these forums.

It means "in this thread"

- DrStudMuffin
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:54 pm
- applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
They're going to start JS2s at 9:15 tomorrow morning 
Edited: iPhone erroneously autocorrects my spelling.

Edited: iPhone erroneously autocorrects my spelling.
Last edited by applelover on Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- turtles
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:23 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
this is way too specific and wonderful to be trueapplelover wrote:They're going to start JS2e at 9:15 tomorrow morning

- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Hahaha I hope not for JS's sake.applelover wrote:They're going to start JS2e at 9:15 tomorrow morning

- CitrusFruit
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
How do you know?applelover wrote:They're going to start JS2e at 9:15 tomorrow morning
- applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Obviously I'm just being optimistic lol.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Happy Gilmore
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:24 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
the federal government is much much worse. I have a spreadsheet at work that has over 8k acronyms in it. Most of the time there is multiple meanings for each acronym tooNoDayButToday wrote:Sorry to be ignorant, but I think law school admissions has more acronyms than the federal government. What does ITT mean? I see that a lot in these forums.
-
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 7:00 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
deleted
Last edited by luckystar84 on Sat Nov 30, 2013 5:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
- teampeeta
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:36 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Is the spreadsheet not working for anyone else at the moment? Procrastinating to the max but have been unsuccessful using this thread as a tool.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:50 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
JS2! Numbers in spreadsheet.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login