Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 262
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:37 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
status update to... application complete?
first movement since 11/26 (application complete), submitted 11/9
uhhh...
first movement since 11/26 (application complete), submitted 11/9
uhhh...
- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same. I wonder if in my case they thought to themselves, "ah, no need to review this one. Ding. Complete."florida1949 wrote:status update to... application complete?
first movement since 11/26 (application complete), submitted 11/9
uhhh...
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
ya but the student intern entering data into the status checkers on a thursday night prob just didn't know they had to change the actual status in addition to the datessanonymous wrote:Same. I wonder if in my case they thought to themselves, "ah, no need to review this one. Ding. Complete."florida1949 wrote:status update to... application complete?
first movement since 11/26 (application complete), submitted 11/9
uhhh...
rite???



- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
...but it would be crazy to get a decision without ever being "under review." That's just mean... right?ninetails wrote:ya but the student intern entering data into the status checkers on a thursday night prob just didn't know they had to change the actual status in addition to the datessanonymous wrote:Same. I wonder if in my case they thought to themselves, "ah, no need to review this one. Ding. Complete."florida1949 wrote:status update to... application complete?
first movement since 11/26 (application complete), submitted 11/9
uhhh...
rite???![]()
![]()
![]()
- Jaqen
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same here.florida1949 wrote:status update to... application complete?
first movement since 11/26 (application complete), submitted 11/9
uhhh...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
they're obviously just switching to the Cornell model... for usssanonymous wrote:...but it would be crazy to get a decision without ever being "under review." That's just mean... right?ninetails wrote:ya but the student intern entering data into the status checkers on a thursday night prob just didn't know they had to change the actual status in addition to the datessanonymous wrote:Same. I wonder if in my case they thought to themselves, "ah, no need to review this one. Ding. Complete."florida1949 wrote:status update to... application complete?
first movement since 11/26 (application complete), submitted 11/9
uhhh...
rite???![]()
![]()
![]()
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Did you guys submit an updated transcript or something? If so, they were probably just adding that to your file.
-
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:07 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
finally, movement! complete 12/5 -> 1/31. still not under review.
- Jaqen
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Nothing of the sort.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Did you guys submit an updated transcript or something? If so, they were probably just adding that to your file.
- risa
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same as the others, very late in the day. First update ever (complete since 11/28) and it's still "complete" - never been under review. Gulp?
Last edited by risa on Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1, complete 12/5--->complete 1/31risa wrote:Same as the others. First update in forever and it's still "complete" - never been user review. Gulp?
- risa
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
ok, help me over-analyze this guys... are any of you strong enough to be admitted without an interview? or weak enough to be auto-dings? I only saw stats in two of your profiles so the fact that I'm in company with two 176s makes me feel slightly better... didn't wisteria get a JS1 today or am I making that up? 

-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also went complete (again) today.
11/28 --> 1/31
Strange.
11/28 --> 1/31
Strange.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No you are not making it up.risa wrote:ok, help me over-analyze this guys... are any of you strong enough to be admitted without an interview? or weak enough to be auto-dings? I only saw stats in two of your profiles so the fact that I'm in company with two 176s makes me feel slightly better... didn't wisteria get a JS1 today or am I making that up?

- risa
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Nope. We should be receiving our acceptance emails around 9:01 CST tomorrow. I will also be receiving my JS1 in the morning, since we have basically the same stats, right wisteria?wisteria wrote:No you are not making it up.risa wrote:ok, help me over-analyze this guys... are any of you strong enough to be admitted without an interview? or weak enough to be auto-dings? I only saw stats in two of your profiles so the fact that I'm in company with two 176s makes me feel slightly better... didn't wisteria get a JS1 today or am I making that up?Most likely though, I think this update simply means we will be under review soon.

- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
i like how the admitted students' handbook mentions both steve bartman and the 100+ years since a cubs ws. sucks to suck 

-
- Posts: 262
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:37 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
status updated to UR todayflorida1949 wrote:status update to... application complete?
first movement since 11/26 (application complete), submitted 11/9
uhhh...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Jaqen
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same!florida1949 wrote:status updated to UR todayflorida1949 wrote:status update to... application complete?
first movement since 11/26 (application complete), submitted 11/9
uhhh...

-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 2:05 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
wow, finally UR... i had given up on that ever happening lol. submitted early november.
- risa
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Not me!Jaqen wrote:Same!florida1949 wrote:status updated to UR todayflorida1949 wrote:status update to... application complete?
first movement since 11/26 (application complete), submitted 11/9
uhhh...

-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
wut? I'm still at complete 1/31. It's like Chicago's way of saying, "I haven't forgotten you, but no, we don't want to review your file."florida1949 wrote:status updated to UR todayflorida1949 wrote:status update to... application complete?
first movement since 11/26 (application complete), submitted 11/9
uhhh...

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- risa
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
since wisteria got the JS1 yesterday, I'm glad I'm still in her boat. I mean, we must just be auto admits, right?wisteria wrote:wut? I'm still at complete 1/31. It's like Chicago's way of saying, "I haven't forgotten you, but no, we don't want to review your file."florida1949 wrote:status updated to UR todayflorida1949 wrote:status update to... application complete?
first movement since 11/26 (application complete), submitted 11/9
uhhh...

- JamesDean1955
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Guys, help me out here, there seem to be two different google spreadsheets circulating, one of which is more comprehensive and has a results column I believe.
The OP doesn't seem to have the more comprehensive one (unless I'm missing it somewhere), can we get this added?
The OP doesn't seem to have the more comprehensive one (unless I'm missing it somewhere), can we get this added?
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by one_by_one on Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I love your optimism! Yes, we are totally getting admitted without review.risa wrote:since wisteria got the JS1 yesterday, I'm glad I'm still in her boat. I mean, we must just be auto admits, right?wisteria wrote:wut? I'm still at complete 1/31. It's like Chicago's way of saying, "I haven't forgotten you, but no, we don't want to review your file."florida1949 wrote:status updated to UR todayflorida1949 wrote:status update to... application complete?
first movement since 11/26 (application complete), submitted 11/9
uhhh...

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login