congrats ! when did you go complete/ UR?bloodonthetracks wrote:in at penn via phone
In other news in at NU via e-mail today.
congrats ! when did you go complete/ UR?bloodonthetracks wrote:in at penn via phone
congrats!!bloodonthetracks wrote:in at penn via phone
You are my hero. Well that is an exaggeration, but I thought I was out for sure at NU because I didn't interview, and there is hope.Nixer wrote:In at Northwestern...out at Harvard. Pleasantly surprised by the former (I didn't interview). Not exactly shocked by the latter.
Are you under 3.85? If so, that explains it since you're under median. If not, then I've got no explanation.existenz wrote:WL at UVa. Not easy to do with 3.8+/170+, but I did it.
When did you go complete?cboo wrote:Finally under review at U. Chicago yesterday.
Stop misquoting me, those aren't my numbers.thickfreakness wrote:Are you under 3.85? If so, that explains it since you're under median. If not, then I've got no explanation.existenz wrote:WL at UVa. Not easy to do with 3.8+/170+, but I did it.
it's very odd. I got WL with a 170 and a 3.34.... if yours is a WL mine should have been a reject.existenz wrote:Yes, slightly. LSAT is a few points above median. (numbers in profile not exact)thickfreakness wrote:Are you under 3.85? If so, that explains it since you're under median. If not, then I've got no explanation.existenz wrote:WL at UVa. Not easy to do with 3.8+/170+, but I did it.
wtf sibley, i'm trying to be serious here.sibley wrote:it's very odd. I got WL with a 170 and a 3.34.... if yours is a WL mine should have been a reject.
oh it does seem like people who were waitlisted then email and ask to be changed to ed get in.existenz wrote:I'm not alone. LSN has plenty of people with similar or better numbers who have been WL'd. Then you look at some of the numbers of people admitted through ED and you just shake your head.sibley wrote:it's very odd. I got WL with a 170 and a 3.34.... if yours is a WL mine should have been a reject.
yayyyyyyyyyy! i saw you posted a lot before my waitlisted self stopped checking the fordham thread so i bet this is pretty exciting news for you- congrats!hannah87 wrote:in at Fordham via email and status checker
why, thank you!!!! very sweet of you. GOOD LUCK!! i hope this is the start of some major movement there, WL included.pollaclc wrote:yayyyyyyyyyy! i saw you posted a lot before my waitlisted self stopped checking the fordham thread so i bet this is pretty exciting news for you- congrats!hannah87 wrote:in at Fordham via email and status checker
+1hannah87 wrote:in at Fordham via email and status checker
2/3meowmeow wrote:When did you go complete?cboo wrote:Finally under review at U. Chicago yesterday.