How does one measure sanity on TLS?China Spy wrote:My IRL friends think I'm nerotic for checking my checkers every morning. Then I read posts on TLS like the ones found on this page, and that's when I know I am still sane.
Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- Nonconsecutive

- Posts: 2398
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
- malleus discentium

- Posts: 906
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 2:30 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Indeed. The inference is not that you are sane, merely that there are others like youNonconsecutive wrote:How does one measure sanity on TLS?China Spy wrote:My IRL friends think I'm nerotic for checking my checkers every morning. Then I read posts on TLS like the ones found on this page, and that's when I know I am still sane.
- China Spy

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:10 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Touché. Also I think we have out new poll question.
- kershka

- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'm curious how many people ITT still check the SLS status checker regularly? I used to but since it never changes, I've sort of given up.
Now I just check my phone for missed messages every time I go to the bathroom
Now I just check my phone for missed messages every time I go to the bathroom
- China Spy

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:10 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Well I went an entire day w/o checking yesterday. But now I need to be on the lookout for that whole uppercase/lowercase email switch.kershka wrote:I'm curious how many people ITT still check the SLS status checker regularly? I used to but since it never changes, I've sort of given up.
Now I just check my phone for missed messages every time I go to the bathroom![]()
- Nonconsecutive

- Posts: 2398
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Classic displacement,kershka wrote:I'm curious how many people ITT still check the SLS status checker regularly? I used to but since it never changes, I've sort of given up.
Now I just check my phone for missed messages every time I go to the bathroom![]()
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I haven't checked since I went completekershka wrote:I'm curious how many people ITT still check the SLS status checker regularly? I used to but since it never changes, I've sort of given up.
Now I just check my phone for missed messages every time I go to the bathroom![]()
But I do periodically check my phone for missed messages
-
teenybean

- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:51 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'm on campus now... I'm considering running a covert operation to "adjust" the admit list. I have black pantyhose in my car...
- China Spy

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:10 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Prty sure Faye just read this msg and your cover is blown.teenybean wrote:I'm on campus now... I'm considering running a covert operation to "adjust" the admit list. I have black pantyhose in my car...
- kershka

- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
The uppercase/lowercase is sadly no longer a thing, or at least it hasn't been for any of the admitted people thus far this cycle. We think that DLS will still indicate a waitlist or rejection, though obviously we cannot prove that since there haven't been any of either so far.China Spy wrote:Well I went an entire day w/o checking yesterday. But now I need to be on the lookout for that whole uppercase/lowercase email switch.kershka wrote:I'm curious how many people ITT still check the SLS status checker regularly? I used to but since it never changes, I've sort of given up.
Now I just check my phone for missed messages every time I go to the bathroom![]()
-
teenybean

- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:51 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
lololol my cover isn't near blown (i've been savvy and particular with my words, plus my UG is really random)
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
But now she knows you're coming! She'll be ready...........
- China Spy

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:10 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Scoobs, I'm digging the duck face in your new selfie. Looks very authentic.
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
is it a selfie when someone else holds the camera? I've always wondered.China Spy wrote:Scoobs, I'm digging the duck face in your new selfie. Looks very authentic.
- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
eta: credit: bomscoobers wrote:is it a selfie when someone else holds the camera? I've always wondered.China Spy wrote:Scoobs, I'm digging the duck face in your new selfie. Looks very authentic.
-
teenybean

- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:51 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
drawstring wrote:But now she knows you're coming! She'll be ready...........
hmmm I'll settle for her knowing that WE'RE ALL GOING CRAZY HERE instead. This is too too long.
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
<3barrelofmonkeys wrote:eta: credit: bomscoobers wrote:is it a selfie when someone else holds the camera? I've always wondered.China Spy wrote:Scoobs, I'm digging the duck face in your new selfie. Looks very authentic.
- China Spy

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:10 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Fails to consider that a selfie may involve using the timer on a camera rather than relying on monkeys.scoobers wrote:is it a selfie when someone else holds the camera? I've always wondered.China Spy wrote:Scoobs, I'm digging the duck face in your new selfie. Looks very authentic.
- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
dumb but i laughed anywayChina Spy wrote:Fails to consider that a selfie may involve using the timer on a camera rather than relying on monkeys.scoobers wrote:is it a selfie when someone else holds the camera? I've always wondered.China Spy wrote:Scoobs, I'm digging the duck face in your new selfie. Looks very authentic.
- HarvardHopeful

- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 1:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
ITS BEGUN!!!! GET YOUR PHONES READY!
Last edited by HarvardHopeful on Wed Feb 25, 2015 12:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
OMG CONGRATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HarvardHopeful wrote:ITS BEGUN!!!! GET YOUR PHONES READY!
IN!!!!!! JUST GOT THE CALL 2 MINUTES AGO STILL SHAKING
Complete 11/7, 174 LSAT 3.9X K-JD
-
Howl

- Posts: 296
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:11 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
CONGRATS!!!!!!HarvardHopeful wrote:ITS BEGUN!!!! GET YOUR PHONES READY!
IN!!!!!! JUST GOT THE CALL 2 MINUTES AGO STILL SHAKING
Complete 11/7, 174 LSAT 3.9X K-JD
- bbkk

- Posts: 728
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
HarvardHopeful wrote:ITS BEGUN!!!! GET YOUR PHONES READY!
IN!!!!!! JUST GOT THE CALL 2 MINUTES AGO STILL SHAKING
Complete 11/7, 174 LSAT 3.9X K-JD
OMG OMG Congrats!!!!!
- Arrow4Christ

- Posts: 418
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:07 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
HarvardHopeful wrote:ITS BEGUN!!!! GET YOUR PHONES READY!
IN!!!!!! JUST GOT THE CALL 2 MINUTES AGO STILL SHAKING
Complete 11/7, 174 LSAT 3.9X K-JD
- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
MAJOR congrats!HarvardHopeful wrote:ITS BEGUN!!!! GET YOUR PHONES READY!
IN!!!!!! JUST GOT THE CALL 2 MINUTES AGO STILL SHAKING
Complete 11/7, 174 LSAT 3.9X K-JD