George Washington c/o 2016 Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
BitterSplitter

Bronze
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:17 am

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by BitterSplitter » Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:30 am

.
Last edited by BitterSplitter on Thu Jun 13, 2013 3:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
User avatar
JayJones78

Gold
Posts: 2025
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by JayJones78 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:33 am

BitterSplitter wrote:
JayJones78 wrote:
InBetweenDays wrote:Anyone seen WL movement?
none here :|
Same:( I REALLY hope I get in this would be a miracle admit for my stAts
pretty much the same here as well.. :oops:
Top
User avatar
gatorgirl2012

Bronze
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:57 am

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by gatorgirl2012 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:48 am

Same on the weak stats >.< I'm really starting to fear how much of a numbers game WL action is compared to regular decisions. I'm way more pessimistic now than I was when I initially received their WL letter. I'm still hopeful but definitely not excited.
Top
sadreversesplitter

New
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 5:04 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by sadreversesplitter » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:06 pm

gatorgirl2012 wrote:Same on the weak stats >.< I'm really starting to fear how much of a numbers game WL action is compared to regular decisions. I'm way more pessimistic now than I was when I initially received their WL letter. I'm still hopeful but definitely not excited.
Low LSAT here, and very high undergrad gpa and grad school gpa. I totally understand the mentality behind accepting based on the numbers, it is just a bit depressing. Fingers crossed it goes well, otherwise, time to retake.
Top
sadreversesplitter

New
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 5:04 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by sadreversesplitter » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:24 pm

Everyone just get the WL email from admissions?
Top
nba101790

Bronze
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:05 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by nba101790 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:25 pm

Just got a wait list update email asking me to reply if I"m still interested.

As a kicker, the header read "Dear XXXX." Seriously?
Top
lawsch16

New
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:54 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by lawsch16 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:26 pm

Anyone under reconsideration for merit scholarship get news today?
Top
User avatar
JayJones78

Gold
Posts: 2025
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by JayJones78 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:27 pm

sadreversesplitter wrote:Everyone just get the WL email from admissions?
NO
how sad :cry:

EDIT: just got it... :oops:
Top
User avatar
gatorgirl2012

Bronze
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:57 am

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by gatorgirl2012 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:27 pm

I recently submitted another LOCI, is it even necessary to reply to this e-mail. At least my LOCI wasn't addressed to ###....
Top
sadreversesplitter

New
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 5:04 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by sadreversesplitter » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:30 pm

nba101790 wrote:Just got a wait list update email asking me to reply if I"m still interested.

As a kicker, the header read "Dear XXXX." Seriously?
Really strange. Why not just omit that header so it doesn't come off totally impersonal?
Top
eomea5

Bronze
Posts: 126
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:14 am

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by eomea5 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:31 pm

also received this WL email after sending a LOCI yesterday (and an email this morning confirming receipt of said LOCI)...

mine also had the "Dear ###"
Top
sadreversesplitter

New
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 5:04 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by sadreversesplitter » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:33 pm

eomea5 wrote:also received this WL email after sending a LOCI yesterday (and an email this morning confirming receipt of said LOCI)...

mine also had the "Dear ###"
I just sent a LOCI last week. I suppose I will just reattach and note my continued interest in response to this email.
Top
User avatar
gatorgirl2012

Bronze
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:57 am

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by gatorgirl2012 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:35 pm

sadreversesplitter wrote:
eomea5 wrote:also received this WL email after sending a LOCI yesterday (and an email this morning confirming receipt of said LOCI)...

mine also had the "Dear ###"
I just sent a LOCI last week. I suppose I will just reattach and note my continued interest in response to this email.
That's what I was going to do, but it all seems so redundant! Its from the same e-mail they recommend you send additional materials to, [email protected]

We're off the grid!
Top
km0828

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 12:27 am

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by km0828 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:40 pm

gatorgirl2012 wrote:
sadreversesplitter wrote:
eomea5 wrote:also received this WL email after sending a LOCI yesterday (and an email this morning confirming receipt of said LOCI)...

mine also had the "Dear ###"
I just sent a LOCI last week. I suppose I will just reattach and note my continued interest in response to this email.
That's what I was going to do, but it all seems so redundant! Its from the same e-mail they recommend you send additional materials to, [email protected]

We're off the grid!
Just got the email too!! Did y'all just send back that you are interested? Or did you attach your LOCI's again?
Cheers :)
Top
User avatar
JayJones78

Gold
Posts: 2025
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by JayJones78 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:43 pm

gatorgirl2012 wrote:
sadreversesplitter wrote:
eomea5 wrote:also received this WL email after sending a LOCI yesterday (and an email this morning confirming receipt of said LOCI)...

mine also had the "Dear ###"
I just sent a LOCI last week. I suppose I will just reattach and note my continued interest in response to this email.
That's what I was going to do, but it all seems so redundant! Its from the same e-mail they recommend you send additional materials to, [email protected]

We're off the grid!
I wrote back and noted my LOCI and reemphasized my interest in joining the class
Top
sadreversesplitter

New
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 5:04 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by sadreversesplitter » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:45 pm

What program are you guys on the WL for? PT or FT?
Top
User avatar
InBetweenDays

New
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:39 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by InBetweenDays » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:50 pm

sadreversesplitter wrote:What program are you guys on the WL for? PT or FT?
FT here.
I also noted my LOCI, and said that my email was simply to confirm that I was still interested in being considered for c/o 2016
Top
km0828

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 12:27 am

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by km0828 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:51 pm

InBetweenDays wrote:
sadreversesplitter wrote:What program are you guys on the WL for? PT or FT?
FT here.
I also noted my LOCI, and said that my email was simply to confirm that I was still interested in being considered for c/o 2016
Full time here too.
Top
User avatar
JayJones78

Gold
Posts: 2025
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by JayJones78 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:51 pm

sadreversesplitter wrote:What program are you guys on the WL for? PT or FT?
FT
Top
User avatar
InBetweenDays

New
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:39 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by InBetweenDays » Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:54 pm

Did anyone else's email start with "Dear ###" ...Everyone knows the letters aren't written for each applicant, but come on!

Edit: never mind... I see that you guys already discussed this.
Top
sadreversesplitter

New
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 5:04 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by sadreversesplitter » Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:00 pm

InBetweenDays wrote:Did anyone else's email start with "Dear ###" ...Everyone knows the letters aren't written for each applicant, but come on!

Edit: never mind... I see that you guys already discussed this.
I just got another WL email specifically to me apologizing for the glitch. I am CONVINCED they follow this message board.
Top
User avatar
InBetweenDays

New
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:39 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by InBetweenDays » Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:01 pm

sadreversesplitter wrote:
InBetweenDays wrote:Did anyone else's email start with "Dear ###" ...Everyone knows the letters aren't written for each applicant, but come on!

Edit: never mind... I see that you guys already discussed this.
I just got another WL email specifically to me apologizing for the glitch. I am CONVINCED they follow this message board.
Likewise, and I had the same thought about them monitoring TLS forums
Top
wannabelawstudent

Gold
Posts: 2578
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by wannabelawstudent » Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:26 pm

What is up with law schools today. 3 schools have e-mail out typos or similar errors today.
Top
User avatar
gatorgirl2012

Bronze
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:57 am

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by gatorgirl2012 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:38 pm

I LOLed so hard at work after receiving the corrected e-mail. I think they're the only school I've seen correct their typos. I honestly hate mail merges, happens to the best of us.
Top
nba101790

Bronze
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:05 pm

Re: George Washington c/o 2016

Post by nba101790 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:40 pm

gatorgirl2012 wrote:I LOLed so hard at work after receiving the corrected e-mail. I think they're the only school I've seen correct their typos. I honestly hate mail merges, happens to the best of us.
I'll say though, after being a little annoyed by the "XXX," I was doubly impressed by their willingness to admit a mistake.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”