> 100 posts and you get quoted in ATL...dhatfie1 wrote:Does anybody else find it rather amusing that Melanie Nutt's email is "nuttme@wfu.com?" lol it describes perfectly what happened to all of us today.
Impressive.
> 100 posts and you get quoted in ATL...dhatfie1 wrote:Does anybody else find it rather amusing that Melanie Nutt's email is "nuttme@wfu.com?" lol it describes perfectly what happened to all of us today.
No kidding. That makes two TLS plugs in recent weeks.mistergoft wrote:> 100 posts and you get quoted in ATL...dhatfie1 wrote:Does anybody else find it rather amusing that Melanie Nutt's email is "nuttme@wfu.com?" lol it describes perfectly what happened to all of us today.
Impressive.
This is totally true. She was really really sweet this morning and made everyone feel very welcome.Luis Gomez wrote:From my own experience Melanie Nutt is one of the most open and student friendly admissions director. If she made any sort of mistake I am sure she regrets it. I am friend of a Wake law grad who has told me nothing but good things about her, and this must be true since there is even a scholarship set up with her name. In my experience Mrs. Nutt (and all of the Wake Forest admissions team) helpfulness is outstanding and only rivaled by that of Dean Pless another famous admissions dean (and constant TLSer).
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Are you saying that to get an increase in your scholarship?akili wrote:This is totally true. She was really really sweet this morning and made everyone feel very welcome.Luis Gomez wrote:From my own experience Melanie Nutt is one of the most open and student friendly admissions director. If she made any sort of mistake I am sure she regrets it. I am friend of a Wake law grad who has told me nothing but good things about her, and this must be true since there is even a scholarship set up with her name. In my experience Mrs. Nutt (and all of the Wake Forest admissions team) helpfulness is outstanding and only rivaled by that of Dean Pless another famous admissions dean (and constant TLSer).
Well I was already offered 30K/year but I turned it down after 3 minutes and asked to be considered for scholarships in a month.Redelicious wrote:Are you saying that to get an increase in your scholarship?akili wrote:This is totally true. She was really really sweet this morning and made everyone feel very welcome.Luis Gomez wrote:From my own experience Melanie Nutt is one of the most open and student friendly admissions director. If she made any sort of mistake I am sure she regrets it. I am friend of a Wake law grad who has told me nothing but good things about her, and this must be true since there is even a scholarship set up with her name. In my experience Mrs. Nutt (and all of the Wake Forest admissions team) helpfulness is outstanding and only rivaled by that of Dean Pless another famous admissions dean (and constant TLSer).
My scholarship cant be increased anymoreakili wrote:Well I was already offered 30K/year but I turned it down after 3 minutes and asked to be considered for scholarships in a month.Redelicious wrote:Are you saying that to get an increase in your scholarship?akili wrote:This is totally true. She was really really sweet this morning and made everyone feel very welcome.Luis Gomez wrote:From my own experience Melanie Nutt is one of the most open and student friendly admissions director. If she made any sort of mistake I am sure she regrets it. I am friend of a Wake law grad who has told me nothing but good things about her, and this must be true since there is even a scholarship set up with her name. In my experience Mrs. Nutt (and all of the Wake Forest admissions team) helpfulness is outstanding and only rivaled by that of Dean Pless another famous admissions dean (and constant TLSer).
Really? After spending years on building credentials, countless hours on apps, months on studying for the LSAT, we can get rejected for .1 point of a gpa, or a typo, or 1 LSAT point, but we shouldn't be mad about the same if done by a "sweet, older lady?" I think you're dumb.women'ssoccer wrote:get over it. a sweet, older lady sent out an extremely important email in error.
if an erroneous email is enough to make you go from attending (strongly considering attending) to withdrawing, then i think you're dumb.
WFU admissions office is easily the best i've dealt with out of the 10 schools I've dealth with.
plus, '09 stats flying around TLS indicate that WFU is on the up and up employment wise--relative to general economic down-turn (they beat out UNC in both njl250 placement and clerkship hiring).
I hope I never go to law school with you.Zojirushi wrote:Really? After spending years on building credentials, countless hours on apps, months on studying for the LSAT, we can get rejected for .1 point of a gpa, or a typo, or 1 LSAT point, but we shouldn't be mad about the same if done by a "sweet, older lady?" I think you're dumb.women'ssoccer wrote:get over it. a sweet, older lady sent out an extremely important email in error.
if an erroneous email is enough to make you go from attending (strongly considering attending) to withdrawing, then i think you're dumb.
WFU admissions office is easily the best i've dealt with out of the 10 schools I've dealth with.
plus, '09 stats flying around TLS indicate that WFU is on the up and up employment wise--relative to general economic down-turn (they beat out UNC in both njl250 placement and clerkship hiring).
Seriously um, what does that even mean? Isn't EVERY applicant eligible for a scholarship? That word choice hardly made me feel better.GatorBait09 wrote:Thank God there's a silver lining: we're all still "eiligible" for scholarships.
haha. yeah, that damage control email, while sincere, wasn't very good. thankfully i read the "error" message before I read the actual email, so the damage for me was averted.minkins wrote:Seriously um, what does that even mean? Isn't EVERY applicant eligible for a scholarship? That word choice hardly made me feel better.GatorBait09 wrote:Thank God there's a silver lining: we're all still "eiligible" for scholarships.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Sarcasm: you're doing it wrong.minkins wrote:Seriously um, what does that even mean? Isn't EVERY applicant eligible for a scholarship? That word choice hardly made me feel better.GatorBait09 wrote:Thank God there's a silver lining: we're all still "eiligible" for scholarships.
Haha, I was too belligerent over the word eligible to even notice it was spelled wrong.... sad. Apparently this "software" doesn't have a spell check?mistergoft wrote:Sarcasm: you're doing it wrong.minkins wrote:Seriously um, what does that even mean? Isn't EVERY applicant eligible for a scholarship? That word choice hardly made me feel better.GatorBait09 wrote:Thank God there's a silver lining: we're all still "eiligible" for scholarships.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
To be honest, I'm sure there are tons of mistakes made on applications (even wrong names in places), and I think for the most part the admissions staff looks at the entire person and their whole body of work instead of focusing in on a single mistake. As someone who has experienced this firsthand, Wake does not reject people because they have 1 less point on the LSAT or .1 less on their GPA or even a single typo. I really feel that Wake wants quality students that they can believe in over numbers. Of course some of those quality students have higher numbers, but there are just as many quality students who's numbers are lower but showed their desire to be at Wake.Zojirushi wrote:
Really? After spending years on building credentials, countless hours on apps, months on studying for the LSAT, we can get rejected for .1 point of a gpa, or a typo, or 1 LSAT point, but we shouldn't be mad about the same if done by a "sweet, older lady?" I think you're dumb.
Your anger is understandable, but isn't Wake the highest ranking school which admitted you? Withdrawing because of an administrative mistake seems like an over reaction.Zojirushi wrote:Really? After spending years on building credentials, countless hours on apps, months on studying for the LSAT, we can get rejected for .1 point of a gpa, or a typo, or 1 LSAT point, but we shouldn't be mad about the same if done by a "sweet, older lady?" I think you're dumb.women'ssoccer wrote:get over it. a sweet, older lady sent out an extremely important email in error.
if an erroneous email is enough to make you go from attending (strongly considering attending) to withdrawing, then i think you're dumb.
WFU admissions office is easily the best i've dealt with out of the 10 schools I've dealth with.
plus, '09 stats flying around TLS indicate that WFU is on the up and up employment wise--relative to general economic down-turn (they beat out UNC in both njl250 placement and clerkship hiring).
jdomash wrote:Got the wrong e-mail yesterday. Got one today for 18 a year...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
yah...waiting to see ha.D. H2Oman wrote:jdomash wrote:Got the wrong e-mail yesterday. Got one today for 18 a year...
Look at out, there's probably a follow-up e-mail coming to take that away.
DonnyMost wrote:Good news guys. I just saved a bunch of money on my tuition by switching to Wake Forest!
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login