No I was rejected.tram988 wrote:IN??jbarl1 wrote:I went DR on 1/12 and received my letter today. I live in central NY state.lawyerlover wrote:has anyone who was DR 1/11 or 1/12 received there letter/package yet?
BC Law 2010 Forum
- jbarl1

- Posts: 563
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:40 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
-
tram988

- Posts: 1160
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Sorry I thought you were someone new! My bad asking twice loljbarl1 wrote:No I was rejected.tram988 wrote:IN??jbarl1 wrote:I went DR on 1/12 and received my letter today. I live in central NY state.lawyerlover wrote:has anyone who was DR 1/11 or 1/12 received there letter/package yet?
-
tram988

- Posts: 1160
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Yesss a fellow 163er!!Matypete wrote:IN at BC 3.84/163
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Matypete

- Posts: 49
- Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:10 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Current Status: Your application has been completed.ecohen14 wrote:when did you go complete?
Current Status Date: 11/16/2009
Decision Status: Decision Rendered
Decision Status Date: 1/12/2010
- Katerina

- Posts: 177
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:54 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Has anyone received any scholarship information yet?
- GobiasIndustries

- Posts: 358
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:56 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
I was wondering the same thing. I know they consider everyone throughout the cycle and send you info when they've decided, but I have no sense of timeframe.Katerina wrote:Has anyone received any scholarship information yet?
-
sand87632

- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:25 am
Re: BC Law 2010
No! I wish...it would make my decision much easier if I knew. I called them and asked about it and they said merit awards are usually offered in January.Katerina wrote:Has anyone received any scholarship information yet?
-
Geist13

- Posts: 739
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 3:21 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Rejected. 167/3.09. Wasn't expecting to get in, but still sucks.
- BC2010

- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:40 am
Re: BC Law 2010
I haven't. Has anyone filled out the forms on needaccess.org? I've heard BC gives out a lot more need based money then merit, anyone else heard anything to this extent?Katerina wrote:Has anyone received any scholarship information yet?
-
doopwooper

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:15 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Waitlisted...
167/3.9
I'm a little surprised by this... I'm probably going to withdraw.
167/3.9
I'm a little surprised by this... I'm probably going to withdraw.
-
moonmaster3

- Posts: 100
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:56 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Holy shit dude....how is that possible?doopwooper wrote:Waitlisted...
167/3.9
I'm a little surprised by this... I'm probably going to withdraw.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sirchristaylor

- Posts: 339
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:33 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
In with a 161, 3.95, non URM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
law_lover

- Posts: 63
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 12:02 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Congrats!!!sirchristaylor wrote:In with a 161, 3.95, non URM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- sirchristaylor

- Posts: 339
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:33 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Thanks!law_lover wrote:Congrats!!!sirchristaylor wrote:In with a 161, 3.95, non URM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
sand87632

- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:25 am
Re: BC Law 2010
Whoa dude, that is crazy. Did you get your app in late? Do you think there was some major typos or grammatical errors. That is very odd. So sorry!doopwooper wrote:Waitlisted...
167/3.9
I'm a little surprised by this... I'm probably going to withdraw.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
MissLucky

- Posts: 903
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:48 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
it's a clear YP i believesand87632 wrote:Whoa dude, that is crazy. Did you get your app in late? Do you think there was some major typos or grammatical errors. That is very odd. So sorry!doopwooper wrote:Waitlisted...
167/3.9
I'm a little surprised by this... I'm probably going to withdraw.
-
dakatz

- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
His numbers aren't high enough to be YP. I know people with numbers right around his, and higher who got in. I think people on here rely a bit too heavily on numbers. Obviously numbers are important, but schools get too many high-numbers applicants to accept every single one. Inevitably they need to reject some people who are boring applicants, have application typos, come off as arrogant in the PS, don't have any extracurricular experience, didn't challenge themselves in school, etc. Don't be so amazed when someone with numbers above the medians gets rejected, because he could be guilty of any of the above, or any number of different things that could get a high-number applicant rejected.MissLucky wrote:it's a clear YP i believesand87632 wrote:Whoa dude, that is crazy. Did you get your app in late? Do you think there was some major typos or grammatical errors. That is very odd. So sorry!doopwooper wrote:Waitlisted...
167/3.9
I'm a little surprised by this... I'm probably going to withdraw.
-
tram988

- Posts: 1160
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
+1,000,000dakatz wrote:His numbers aren't high enough to be YP. I know people with numbers right around his, and higher who got in. I think people on here rely a bit too heavily on numbers. Obviously numbers are important, but schools get too many high-numbers applicants to accept every single one. Inevitably they need to reject some people who are boring applicants, have application typos, come off as arrogant in the PS, don't have any extracurricular experience, didn't challenge themselves in school, etc. Don't be so amazed when someone with numbers above the medians gets rejected, because he could be guilty of any of the above, or any number of different things that could get a high-number applicant rejected.MissLucky wrote:it's a clear YP i believesand87632 wrote:Whoa dude, that is crazy. Did you get your app in late? Do you think there was some major typos or grammatical errors. That is very odd. So sorry!doopwooper wrote:Waitlisted...
167/3.9
I'm a little surprised by this... I'm probably going to withdraw.
-
sand87632

- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:25 am
Re: BC Law 2010
dakatz wrote:His numbers aren't high enough to be YP. I know people with numbers right around his, and higher who got in. I think people on here rely a bit too heavily on numbers. Obviously numbers are important, but schools get too many high-numbers applicants to accept every single one. Inevitably they need to reject some people who are boring applicants, have application typos, come off as arrogant in the PS, don't have any extracurricular experience, didn't challenge themselves in school, etc. Don't be so amazed when someone with numbers above the medians gets rejected, because he could be guilty of any of the above, or any number of different things that could get a high-number applicant rejected.MissLucky wrote:it's a clear YP i believesand87632 wrote:Whoa dude, that is crazy. Did you get your app in late? Do you think there was some major typos or grammatical errors. That is very odd. So sorry!doopwooper wrote:Waitlisted...
167/3.9
I'm a little surprised by this... I'm probably going to withdraw.
What do you think it was doopwooper?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sayruss11

- Posts: 87
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:47 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
You give me hope!sirchristaylor wrote:In with a 161, 3.95, non URM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
161/3.92 and still waiting...
-
ExcitedBlutterance

- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:11 am
Re: BC Law 2010
What is your avatar?sayruss11 wrote:You give me hope!sirchristaylor wrote:In with a 161, 3.95, non URM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
161/3.92 and still waiting...
- TWoodWil

- Posts: 205
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:19 am
Re: BC Law 2010
REJECTED
At best I was expected a WL, so it's no big loss. Plus, for me it was one of those "Well that's nice" not a heart-set-on-it school.
At best I was expected a WL, so it's no big loss. Plus, for me it was one of those "Well that's nice" not a heart-set-on-it school.
-
tram988

- Posts: 1160
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
wow #'s?? Sorry manTWoodWil wrote:REJECTED
At best I was expected a WL, so it's no big loss. Plus, for me it was one of those "Well that's nice" not a heart-set-on-it school.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login