Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- paul34

- Posts: 315
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:37 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by paul34 on Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
EMZE

- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
paul34 wrote:Status date didn't change today, but page updated date did. Is there someone working on Saturday?
If there is, they aren't sending out status checkers...
- paul34

- Posts: 315
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:37 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by paul34 on Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Hawkeye Pierce

- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, no. There's a significant enough margin between NYU and Mich/Penn in the absolute score given by USNWR.paul34 wrote:I just thought about something concerning.
What if Michigan, now at 7 (up from 9 in years past), tries to make a further push in order to officially become part of the T6? Does anyone think Michigan's move up two places would result in an overall increase in applications, like UT has allegedly had now that it is in the top 14 as of the last rankings?
At the same time, even if that were true, perhaps that means the the lower T6 will fight harder for more qualified candidates, thus meaning Michigan just won't be able to get them, thus meaning that the less impressively numbered among us might still have a chance.
Events in the UT thread have me concerned.
C: 92
C: 90
N: 89
M: 86
P: 86
- msblaw89

- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't think Mich will be like UT. People with 166's and 167's have been accepted that are non URM. I feel like Mich is less numbers hungryHawkeye Pierce wrote:Yeah, no. There's a significant enough margin between NYU and Mich/Penn in the absolute score given by USNWR.paul34 wrote:I just thought about something concerning.
What if Michigan, now at 7 (up from 9 in years past), tries to make a further push in order to officially become part of the T6? Does anyone think Michigan's move up two places would result in an overall increase in applications, like UT has allegedly had now that it is in the top 14 as of the last rankings?
At the same time, even if that were true, perhaps that means the the lower T6 will fight harder for more qualified candidates, thus meaning Michigan just won't be able to get them, thus meaning that the less impressively numbered among us might still have a chance.
Events in the UT thread have me concerned.
C: 92
C: 90
N: 89
M: 86
P: 86
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Tiago Splitter

- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yup. And the 166/3.5 admitted this cycle shows they aren't too concerned about moving up.Hawkeye Pierce wrote:Yeah, no. There's a significant enough margin between NYU and Mich/Penn in the absolute score given by USNWR.paul34 wrote:I just thought about something concerning.
What if Michigan, now at 7 (up from 9 in years past), tries to make a further push in order to officially become part of the T6? Does anyone think Michigan's move up two places would result in an overall increase in applications, like UT has allegedly had now that it is in the top 14 as of the last rankings?
At the same time, even if that were true, perhaps that means the the lower T6 will fight harder for more qualified candidates, thus meaning Michigan just won't be able to get them, thus meaning that the less impressively numbered among us might still have a chance.
Events in the UT thread have me concerned.
C: 92
C: 90
N: 89
M: 86
P: 86
But if they want to move up that LSAT median I am here to help
- UnamSanctam

- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
FTFMTiago Splitter wrote: But if they want tomove uphold that LSAT median I am here to help
- Tim0thy222

- Posts: 339
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:57 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Checking in. Just sent in my app.
Wasn't going to bother since I felt like my chances were too slim, but I have an LSAC fee waiver, so I figured my slightly-greater-than-zero chance was worth it.
Wasn't going to bother since I felt like my chances were too slim, but I have an LSAC fee waiver, so I figured my slightly-greater-than-zero chance was worth it.
- UnamSanctam

- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
a 3.2/177 and you think you have slim chances? LOLTim0thy222 wrote:Checking in. Just sent in my app.
Wasn't going to bother since I felt like my chances were too slim, but I have an LSAC fee waiver, so I figured my slightly-greater-than-zero chance was worth it.
- Tim0thy222

- Posts: 339
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:57 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
You think I have a decent shot?UnamSanctam wrote:a 3.2/177 and you think you have slim chances? LOLTim0thy222 wrote:Checking in. Just sent in my app.
Wasn't going to bother since I felt like my chances were too slim, but I have an LSAC fee waiver, so I figured my slightly-greater-than-zero chance was worth it.
Last year they WL'ed/rejected most people below 3.3 regardless of LSAT. Same with 2009. It looks like I would've fared better in the 08-09 cycle, so maybe the decreased number of app this year will work in my favor.
I don't know, plus looking at their LSN graphs they seem unpredictable in terms of numbers, suggesting that they are holistic about their admissions decisions, and I don't know how strong my app is outside my numbers.
- UnamSanctam

- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It's been suggested they have a soft 3.3 GPA floor. While it's certainly possible, I think that 177 gives you a really good shot if this cycle is going to play out how I think it will. I could be wrong, but since a 3.5/166 got in, I think a 3.2/177 has a great shot.Tim0thy222 wrote:You think I have a decent shot?UnamSanctam wrote:a 3.2/177 and you think you have slim chances? LOLTim0thy222 wrote:Checking in. Just sent in my app.
Wasn't going to bother since I felt like my chances were too slim, but I have an LSAC fee waiver, so I figured my slightly-greater-than-zero chance was worth it.
Last year they WL'ed/rejected most people below 3.3 regardless of LSAT. Same with 2009. It looks like I would've fared better in the 08-09 cycle, so maybe the decreased number of app this year will work in my favor.
I don't know, plus looking at their LSN graphs they seem unpredictable in terms of numbers, suggesting that they are holistic about their admissions decisions, and I don't know how strong my app is outside my numbers.
- DaftAndDirect

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:28 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Checking in. Application submitted today. I feel like today's a good day to start smoking cigarettes.
- Tim0thy222

- Posts: 339
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:57 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
You should. I've never been a smoker, but I have recently been enjoying these on occasion:DaftAndDirect wrote:Checking in. Application submitted today. I feel like today's a good day to start smoking cigarettes.
You know, not to be a bad influence or anything. Good luck on your app!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
anewaphorist

- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:13 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
^TITCR. Delicious cloves are.
- holden147

- Posts: 150
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 3:30 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Checking in. Applied at Michigan - my #1 choice. It's a bit of a reach for me but I feel I had a great PS and the professors that wrote my LORs were very excited about writing them so hopefully those 2 things give me a bit of a boost. GL all.
- whirledpeas86

- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 2:07 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
As a current law student, I would advise you to get started on increasing your smoking and drinking ASAP. Cigarettes and alcohol (among several other vices) are the only ways I motivate myself to get anything done these days.Tim0thy222 wrote:You should. I've never been a smoker, but I have recently been enjoying these on occasion:DaftAndDirect wrote:Checking in. Application submitted today. I feel like today's a good day to start smoking cigarettes.
You know, not to be a bad influence or anything. Good luck on your app!
- DaftAndDirect

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:28 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
edit out
Last edited by DaftAndDirect on Tue Jan 17, 2012 11:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Tim0thy222

- Posts: 339
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:57 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just so you know, when you run for president, the whole world will find out that you publicized your intentions to masturbate on TLS. I'll still vote for you though, FWIW.DaftAndDirect wrote:I was actually planning on sticking with masturbation. It's cheaper, and I don't want any candid photos of me puffing any Marlboros on file when I eventually run for president.
- CattyPake

- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Checking in. Finished my application today! 3.68 and 166/169 so I dunno how the two scores will effect me.
- paul34

- Posts: 315
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:37 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by paul34 on Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Tiago Splitter

- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I didn't write an addendum and I won't be adding one after reading that.paul34 wrote:From MLS' websiteCattyPake wrote:Checking in. Finished my application today! 3.68 and 166/169 so I dunno how the two scores will effect me.
Uh oh. Reading that last sentence, I should've added an addendum. Do you all think I should e-mail an addendum? I don't want to "reset" my file or anything, or maybe they've already looked at my file? Do you all think it will be a big deal if I don't submit an addendum? There is an explanation, but it's nothing earth-shattering.How does the University of Michigan Law School handle multiple LSAT scores?
The Credential Assembly Service (CAS) report for an applicant who has sat for the LSAT more than once will show every score or cancellation, as well as the average score. The ABA requires law schools to report score information based on an admitted student's highest score, and therefore, that is the score to which we give the most weight. We do, however, consider the average score as well, because data provided by the Law School Admissions Council suggests that it has the greatest predictive utility. The average score becomes less useful as the disparity between two scores increases; for that reason, if you have a significant disparity between scores (six or more points), it would be very helpful to address any explanation for the difference in an optional essay or addendum.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
grimfan

- Posts: 89
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:40 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Cloves can give you such a nice headrush. But I can't smoke more than one at a time because they leave a slightly sickeningly sweet taste in your mouth.Tim0thy222 wrote:You should. I've never been a smoker, but I have recently been enjoying these on occasion:DaftAndDirect wrote:Checking in. Application submitted today. I feel like today's a good day to start smoking cigarettes.
You know, not to be a bad influence or anything. Good luck on your app!
- buckilaw

- Posts: 839
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 1:27 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't think Dean Z is overly concerned with the rankings. If you look at Michigan's LSN over the past couple cycles you see WL's sprinkled throughout. I'm a firm believer that if you are above 1 median you have a fighting chance to get an acceptance.paul34 wrote:I just thought about something concerning.
What if Michigan, now at 7 (up from 9 in years past), tries to make a further push in order to officially become part of the T6? Does anyone think Michigan's move up two places would result in an overall increase in applications, like UT has allegedly had now that it is in the top 14 as of the last rankings?
At the same time, even if that were true, perhaps that means the the lower T6 will fight harder for more qualified candidates, thus meaning Michigan just won't be able to get them, thus meaning that the less impressively numbered among us might still have a chance.
Events in the UT thread have me concerned.
- thelawschoolproject

- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
buckilaw wrote:
I don't think Dean Z is overly concerned with the rankings. If you look at Michigan's LSN over the past couple cycles you see WL's sprinkled throughout. I'm a firm believer that if you are above 1 median you have a fighting chance to get an acceptance.
Please let this be true!
- sandwiches5000

- Posts: 412
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 11:54 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Does anyone who submitted mid/late October NOT have 11/17 as the latest complete date?
Still have it and still red on ASW here. -_- I think I should stop checking.
Still have it and still red on ASW here. -_- I think I should stop checking.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login