+1 except 11/4. I applied PT though.MissLucky wrote:complete 11/3 and STILL NOT under review.
Georgetown 2013/ (2014) Forum
- danidancer

- Posts: 841
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:46 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
-
MissLucky

- Posts: 903
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:48 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
I'm PT tooooo0o0oo0o0danidancer wrote:+1 except 11/4. I applied PT though.MissLucky wrote:complete 11/3 and STILL NOT under review.
oy.
- billyez

- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:19 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
That's it.
I'm going to have to eat the application fees to Gonzaga and the other schools that have great public interest programs. Georgetown was an unrealistic longshot to begin with even with WE and URM - but if we EDer's aren't even under review at this point, it can be surmised that they're going to wait until the Deember 15th deadline. I'm going to focus on maintaining a 168 on my PT's for the December LSAT rather than stress over this anymore and not hold off on other schools just beause my dream is taking it's sweet time.
I'm going to have to eat the application fees to Gonzaga and the other schools that have great public interest programs. Georgetown was an unrealistic longshot to begin with even with WE and URM - but if we EDer's aren't even under review at this point, it can be surmised that they're going to wait until the Deember 15th deadline. I'm going to focus on maintaining a 168 on my PT's for the December LSAT rather than stress over this anymore and not hold off on other schools just beause my dream is taking it's sweet time.
-
avacado111

- Posts: 403
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 8:49 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
EDs are UR currently. There is no need to panic.billyez wrote:That's it.
I'm going to have to eat the application fees to Gonzaga and the other schools that have great public interest programs. Georgetown was an unrealistic longshot to begin with even with WE and URM - but if we EDer's aren't even under review at this point, it can be surmised that they're going to wait until the Deember 15th deadline. I'm going to focus on maintaining a 168 on my PT's for the December LSAT rather than stress over this anymore and not hold off on other schools just beause my dream is taking it's sweet time.
-
MissLucky

- Posts: 903
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:48 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
I'm not UR and I am ED.avacado111 wrote:EDs are UR currently. There is no need to panic.billyez wrote:That's it.
I'm going to have to eat the application fees to Gonzaga and the other schools that have great public interest programs. Georgetown was an unrealistic longshot to begin with even with WE and URM - but if we EDer's aren't even under review at this point, it can be surmised that they're going to wait until the Deember 15th deadline. I'm going to focus on maintaining a 168 on my PT's for the December LSAT rather than stress over this anymore and not hold off on other schools just beause my dream is taking it's sweet time.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- puppleberry finn

- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
oh. you should probably commence panicking then.MissLucky wrote:I'm not UR and I am ED.avacado111 wrote: EDs are UR currently. There is no need to panic.
-
avacado111

- Posts: 403
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 8:49 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
oops. I am UR currently. sorry. that was a bad type. hahaha. I actually have been updated with some of the other EDers on this fourm.puppins wrote:oh. you should probably commence panicking then.MissLucky wrote:I'm not UR and I am ED.avacado111 wrote: EDs are UR currently. There is no need to panic.
-
MissLucky

- Posts: 903
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:48 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
commence? or continue?puppins wrote:oh. you should probably commence panicking then.MissLucky wrote:I'm not UR and I am ED.avacado111 wrote: EDs are UR currently. There is no need to panic.
- puppleberry finn

- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
ladies' choiceMissLucky wrote:commence? or continue?puppins wrote:oh. you should probably commence panicking then.MissLucky wrote:I'm not UR and I am ED.avacado111 wrote: EDs are UR currently. There is no need to panic.
-
MissLucky

- Posts: 903
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:48 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
ladies' choice[/quote]MissLucky wrote:commence? or continue?puppins wrote:oh. you should probably commence panicking then.MissLucky wrote:I'm not UR and I am ED.avacado111 wrote: EDs are UR currently. There is no need to panic.
but seriously is there anything real I can do to accelerate my file going under review? should I call or e-mail? this is bugging me out.
- puppleberry finn

- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
No, there isn't. Think about it; if you called, what exactly are you going to say? "Please review my file quicker kthxbai"? It'd be half ridiculous and half annoying. Just chill.MissLucky wrote: but seriously is there anything real I can do to accelerate my file going under review? should I call or e-mail? this is bugging me out.
-
MissLucky

- Posts: 903
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:48 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
that's what i had in mindpuppins wrote:No, there isn't. Think about it; if you called, what exactly are you going to say? "Please review my file quicker kthxbai"? It'd be half ridiculous and half annoying. Just chill.MissLucky wrote: but seriously is there anything real I can do to accelerate my file going under review? should I call or e-mail? this is bugging me out.
- puppleberry finn

- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
you could always storm their admissions offices and take their villages captive.MissLucky wrote:that's what i had in mindpuppins wrote:No, there isn't. Think about it; if you called, what exactly are you going to say? "Please review my file quicker kthxbai"? It'd be half ridiculous and half annoying. Just chill.MissLucky wrote: but seriously is there anything real I can do to accelerate my file going under review? should I call or e-mail? this is bugging me out.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Philaw

- Posts: 324
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:49 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
This is totally more what I had in mind.puppins wrote:you could always storm their admissions offices and take their villages captive.MissLucky wrote:that's what i had in mindpuppins wrote:No, there isn't. Think about it; if you called, what exactly are you going to say? "Please review my file quicker kthxbai"? It'd be half ridiculous and half annoying. Just chill.MissLucky wrote: but seriously is there anything real I can do to accelerate my file going under review? should I call or e-mail? this is bugging me out.
-
Torvon

- Posts: 326
- Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
So based on the information over at LSN there haven't been any WL or rejects yet this cycle, correct? What's the absolute longest anyone has been "Under Review"?
- beebs

- Posts: 219
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
I would give my first-born child (if I had a first-born child) to just be Under Review.Torvon wrote:So based on the information over at LSN there haven't been any WL or rejects yet this cycle, correct? What's the absolute longest anyone has been "Under Review"?
-
Torvon

- Posts: 326
- Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
I'm just trying to figure out if they are looking at the applications that have a good chance of being admitted first or if they are just leaving the potential WL and Reject people Under Review for an extremely long period of time.beebs wrote:I would give my first-born child (if I had a first-born child) to just be Under Review.Torvon wrote:So based on the information over at LSN there haven't been any WL or rejects yet this cycle, correct? What's the absolute longest anyone has been "Under Review"?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
tesoro

- Posts: 473
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:10 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
WL and reject are coming. a number of people with sub-median numbers including myself had decisions rendered last Friday, so expect the first batch this week and next week.Torvon wrote:I'm just trying to figure out if they are looking at the applications that have a good chance of being admitted first or if they are just leaving the potential WL and Reject people Under Review for an extremely long period of time.beebs wrote:I would give my first-born child (if I had a first-born child) to just be Under Review.Torvon wrote:So based on the information over at LSN there haven't been any WL or rejects yet this cycle, correct? What's the absolute longest anyone has been "Under Review"?
My understanding is admissions are strictly rolling. I applied on 9/21 so that's why i'm in the first batch of decisions for non-presumptive admits, despite my numbers.
HTH
-
umichgrad

- Posts: 381
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:53 am
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
UR 11/20, friday, and no mail today. i live around the corner...can't they just tell me already?!? i'm pretty sure it's gonna be a ding.
-
jk11287

- Posts: 382
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:27 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
I have numbers on the lower side, and I haven't received a DR, so I wouldn't worry about rejections yet.AdmitMe17 wrote:Did anyone get anything in the mail who went DR on 11/20? I went DR then, but nothing has come in the mail so far. I am just under Georgetown's medians, but in the range and am unsure that having a decision rendered so early might mean it is a rejection...thoughts?
- beebs

- Posts: 219
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
I'm losing hope. Pretty sure I'm getting dinged.tesoro wrote:WL and reject are coming. a number of people with sub-median numbers including myself had decisions rendered last Friday, so expect the first batch this week and next week.Torvon wrote:I'm just trying to figure out if they are looking at the applications that have a good chance of being admitted first or if they are just leaving the potential WL and Reject people Under Review for an extremely long period of time.beebs wrote:I would give my first-born child (if I had a first-born child) to just be Under Review.Torvon wrote:So based on the information over at LSN there haven't been any WL or rejects yet this cycle, correct? What's the absolute longest anyone has been "Under Review"?
My understanding is admissions are strictly rolling. I applied on 9/21 so that's why i'm in the first batch of decisions for non-presumptive admits, despite my numbers.
HTH
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
tesoro

- Posts: 473
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:10 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
nevermind.
Last edited by tesoro on Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- letsgojayhawks

- Posts: 179
- Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:43 am
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
I can't believe no one went DR today. This breaks the pattern...hmm
-
oneforship

- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:17 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
ftfyletsgojayhawks wrote:I can't believe no one went DR today. This sucks. [strike]breaks the pattern...hmm[/strike]
- letsgojayhawks

- Posts: 179
- Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:43 am
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
that's better.oneforship wrote:ftfyletsgojayhawks wrote:I can't believe no one went DR today. This sucks. [strike]breaks the pattern...hmm[/strike]
now i feel stupid for frantically refreshing my status checker all day long
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login