Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply

Have you been admitted?

Yes
76
21%
No
290
79%
 
Total votes: 366

Kimikho

Gold
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by Kimikho » Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:44 pm

koalacity wrote:
drawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?

Apparently they like those, but I couldn't find a professor of mine that was connected to the school in any way so I didn't think it was appropriate.
The better question is who did. I wouldn't worry about it.
What does tailored to Furd mean?

User avatar
China Spy

Bronze
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:10 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by China Spy » Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:46 pm

scoobers wrote:
koalacity wrote:
drawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?

Apparently they like those, but I couldn't find a professor of mine that was connected to the school in any way so I didn't think it was appropriate.
The better question is who did. I wouldn't worry about it.
What does tailored to Furd mean?
Someone who wrote you a LOR specifically mentioning why you would be a great fit for Stanford.

User avatar
The-Specs

Silver
Posts: 1039
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by The-Specs » Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:47 pm

scoobers wrote:
koalacity wrote:
drawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?

Apparently they like those, but I couldn't find a professor of mine that was connected to the school in any way so I didn't think it was appropriate.
The better question is who did. I wouldn't worry about it.
What does tailored to Furd mean?
Furd is Stanford.

User avatar
drawstring

Gold
Posts: 1933
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by drawstring » Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:57 pm

scoobers wrote:
koalacity wrote:
drawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?

Apparently they like those, but I couldn't find a professor of mine that was connected to the school in any way so I didn't think it was appropriate.
The better question is who did. I wouldn't worry about it.
What does tailored to Furd mean?
love the avatar

User avatar
barrelofmonkeys

Gold
Posts: 1942
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by barrelofmonkeys » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:04 pm

scoobers wrote:
koalacity wrote:
drawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?

Apparently they like those, but I couldn't find a professor of mine that was connected to the school in any way so I didn't think it was appropriate.
The better question is who did. I wouldn't worry about it.
What does tailored to Furd mean?
OMFG YOU STOLE MY AVATAR GOD DAMN YOU

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
thechancellor

Silver
Posts: 584
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by thechancellor » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:08 pm

scoobers wrote:
koalacity wrote:
drawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?

Apparently they like those, but I couldn't find a professor of mine that was connected to the school in any way so I didn't think it was appropriate.
The better question is who did. I wouldn't worry about it.
What does tailored to Furd mean?
woah almost didint recognize you there scoobs. didja give up on waiting for 2800 post?

Kimikho

Gold
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by Kimikho » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:09 pm

alex.cm wrote:
scoobers wrote:
koalacity wrote:
drawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?

Apparently they like those, but I couldn't find a professor of mine that was connected to the school in any way so I didn't think it was appropriate.
The better question is who did. I wouldn't worry about it.
What does tailored to Furd mean?
woah almost didint recognize you there scoobs. didja give up on waiting for 2800 post?
I used it in gtown for scotty :(

User avatar
JD1776

New
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 3:08 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by JD1776 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:22 pm

koalacity wrote:
drawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?

Apparently they like those, but I couldn't find a professor of mine that was connected to the school in any way so I didn't think it was appropriate.
The better question is who did. I wouldn't worry about it.
I did. But I'm lucky enough to work with several of their alumni. They say they place "high value" on such letters, I just wish I knew how much.

User avatar
angels2fly

Bronze
Posts: 428
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:15 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by angels2fly » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:29 pm

koalacity wrote:
drawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?

Apparently they like those, but I couldn't find a professor of mine that was connected to the school in any way so I didn't think it was appropriate.
The better question is who did. I wouldn't worry about it.
I had both LOR targeted but I don't have the #s so I am really grasping at straws.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
wowhio

Bronze
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 4:52 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by wowhio » Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:46 pm

The-Specs wrote:
wealtheow wrote:People, please convince me to apply here, before the deadline makes the decision for me. I keep telling myself it isn't worth it w/ my 3.75.
I applied with a 3.58. hth
Same boat.

3.75 is a great GPA! Put your game face on! You've got this!
Last edited by wowhio on Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
wowhio

Bronze
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 4:52 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by wowhio » Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:50 pm

drawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?
*sheepishly raises hand*

FWIW, I think it's stupid that Stanford likes tailored letters. Tailored letters are stupid. Basically all it shows is that the person asked really nicely and their professor/letter-writer was very, very generous and agreed to write a special letter so Stanford could feel all coddled and loved.

User avatar
JD1776

New
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 3:08 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by JD1776 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:00 pm

wowhio wrote:
drawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?
*sheepishly raises hand*

FWIW, I think it's stupid that Stanford likes tailored letters. Tailored letters are stupid. Basically all it shows is that the person asked really nicely and their professor/letter-writer was very, very generous and agreed to write a special letter so Stanford could feel all coddled and loved.
For me, Stanford is my top choice. It's also a reach, so if they want to be coddled and loved -- then I shall coddle and love them.

User avatar
kershka

Silver
Posts: 630
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by kershka » Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:21 pm

JD1776 wrote:
wowhio wrote:
drawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?
*sheepishly raises hand*

FWIW, I think it's stupid that Stanford likes tailored letters. Tailored letters are stupid. Basically all it shows is that the person asked really nicely and their professor/letter-writer was very, very generous and agreed to write a special letter so Stanford could feel all coddled and loved.
For me, Stanford is my top choice. It's also a reach, so if they want to be coddled and loved -- then I shall coddle and love them.
Well, that's fine for you lucky bastards who know SLS alums :P

In all honesty, I would have if I had known any alums who could have written a good, targeted letter. SLS is my first choice as well so I'm willing to jump through just about any hoops necessary. However, getting a letter out of one of my profs was a huge deal due to circumstances and asking for a targeted letter just seemed too much of an additional imposition given those circumstances. He wrote me an amazing letter though, so I can't complain.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
lawschool22

Gold
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by lawschool22 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:25 pm

kershka wrote:
JD1776 wrote:
wowhio wrote:
drawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?
*sheepishly raises hand*

FWIW, I think it's stupid that Stanford likes tailored letters. Tailored letters are stupid. Basically all it shows is that the person asked really nicely and their professor/letter-writer was very, very generous and agreed to write a special letter so Stanford could feel all coddled and loved.
For me, Stanford is my top choice. It's also a reach, so if they want to be coddled and loved -- then I shall coddle and love them.
Well, that's fine for you lucky bastards who know SLS alums :P

In all honesty, I would have if I had known any alums who could have written a good, targeted letter. SLS is my first choice as well so I'm willing to jump through just about any hoops necessary. However, getting a letter out of one of my profs was a huge deal due to circumstances and asking for a targeted letter just seemed too much of an additional imposition given those circumstances. He wrote me an amazing letter though, so I can't complain.
Is there a way of seeing said letter without violating the agreement you make w/ LSAC not to see it?

Kimikho

Gold
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by Kimikho » Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:29 pm

scoobers wrote:
so..............¿tomorrow?

only time I'm doing that, folks. I'm a BIG believer in jinxing
It's stuff like this that reinforces my fear of jinxes :|

User avatar
barrelofmonkeys

Gold
Posts: 1942
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by barrelofmonkeys » Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:31 pm

scoobers wrote:
scoobers wrote:
so..............¿tomorrow?

only time I'm doing that, folks. I'm a BIG believer in jinxing
It's stuff like this that reinforces my fear of jinxes :|
but i thought the 30th was the big day
:P

Kimikho

Gold
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by Kimikho » Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:34 pm

barrelofmonkeys wrote:
scoobers wrote:
scoobers wrote:
so..............¿tomorrow?

only time I'm doing that, folks. I'm a BIG believer in jinxing
It's stuff like this that reinforces my fear of jinxes :|
but i thought the 30th was the big day
:P
the 30th was on a Wednesday last year :?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
barrelofmonkeys

Gold
Posts: 1942
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by barrelofmonkeys » Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:35 pm

scoobers wrote:
barrelofmonkeys wrote:
scoobers wrote:
scoobers wrote:
so..............¿tomorrow?

only time I'm doing that, folks. I'm a BIG believer in jinxing
It's stuff like this that reinforces my fear of jinxes :|
but i thought the 30th was the big day
:P
the 30th was on a Wednesday last year :?
whatever. i don't even know why i'm ITT.

User avatar
kershka

Silver
Posts: 630
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by kershka » Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:42 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
Is there a way of seeing said letter without violating the agreement you make w/ LSAC not to see it?
Yeah, you're only waiving your right to demand the letter from whatever school you matriculate to after you are a student. You can always ask your recommender if they are willing to show it to you, though they are under no obligation to do so. However, my previous statement was a bit ambiguous; I never actually read my letter. He just told me what he had written after he had sent it in.

User avatar
lawschool22

Gold
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by lawschool22 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:44 pm

kershka wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
Is there a way of seeing said letter without violating the agreement you make w/ LSAC not to see it?
Yeah, you're only waiving your right to demand the letter from whatever school you matriculate to after you are a student. You can always ask your recommender if they are willing to show it to you, though they are under no obligation to do so. However, my previous statement was a bit ambiguous; I never actually read my letter. He just told me what he had written after he had sent it in.
Gotcha. Thanks!

teenybean

Bronze
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:51 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by teenybean » Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:45 pm

All my recommenders just sent me their letters in an email once I thanked them. They must've known I was super curious. It's definitely worth asking, it's such a peace of mind.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
lawschool22

Gold
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by lawschool22 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:50 pm

teenybean wrote:All my recommenders just sent me their letters in an email once I thanked them. They must've known I was super curious. It's definitely worth asking, it's such a peace of mind.
Lol, for extremely specific but uninteresting reasons I sort of want my recommenders to forget I am even going to law school for the time being, so I probably won't ask for now. Although I am very curious to read what they wrote.

User avatar
DonnaPaulsen

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by DonnaPaulsen » Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:54 pm

At least 9 people have been admitted this week.

User avatar
kershka

Silver
Posts: 630
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by kershka » Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:55 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
teenybean wrote:All my recommenders just sent me their letters in an email once I thanked them. They must've known I was super curious. It's definitely worth asking, it's such a peace of mind.
Lol, for extremely specific but uninteresting reasons I sort of want my recommenders to forget I am even going to law school for the time being, so I probably won't ask for now. Although I am very curious to read what they wrote.
lol, you probably phrased it that way "specific but uninteresting" so as not to elicit questions from us but you failed. Now I am even more curious to know why you want them to forget you are applying to law school :P

*Disclaimer: I'm not actually asking you to answer this question; it sounds like it could out you. It is just going to bug me for the rest of the night (yes, my life is that uninteresting)

User avatar
koalacity

Silver
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by koalacity » Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:56 pm

DonnaPaulsen wrote:At least 9 people have been admitted this week.
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
What?!? How do you know?!?!?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”