I know, no complaints here! I honestly don’t mind what happens with Virginia. I didn’t write a “Why UVA” and I know they love that shit. If I get waitlisted I’ll withdraw immediately.icedflames wrote:MUST BELIEEEVE! (but you're in Stanford already!)AmandaPB wrote:Mine changed, too. Submitted SEPTEMBER THIRDDDD. Welcome to the waitlist.
UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- AmandaPB
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- acadec
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 2:35 am
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Mine changed too (complete 10/26). Sounds like it happened both to people who would expect to get in and people expecting a WL, so I'd agree with Take Two that it's probably not meaningful. For what it's worth, I don't think I'm good enough to YP, so if we're all gonna end up on the wait list, at least I'll have earned it the old fashioned way.
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:29 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
In at UVA today! PM for stats, but I was a splitter (high gpa, below 170 LSAT). Submitted in early November. I'm out of state, so definitely not expecting this.
- Take Two
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:30 am
- lrslayer
- Posts: 576
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:38 am
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
ftfmTake Two wrote:to add to the baseless speculation I recieved the update submittedmid novemberend of october (withano why UVA), kinda makes me think it was a generic RD update
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crumpledq
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:28 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Congratulations!!soriano329 wrote:In at UVA today! PM for stats, but I was a splitter (high gpa, below 170 LSAT). Submitted in early November. I'm out of state, so definitely not expecting this.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 5:34 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Status change this morning, WL paranoia begins....NOW
- lawschool899
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 4:11 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Why is everyone assuming waitlist with the header change?
- crooked
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:23 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Because UVA is notorious for WLing applicants and because people on TLS generally assume that status checker updates are meaningful in some way.lawschool899 wrote:Why is everyone assuming waitlist with the header change?
- crumpledq
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:28 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Also, paranoia is a good way to play the expectations game with yourself. Better to be pleasantly surprised than unexpectedly disappointedcrooked wrote:Because UVA is notorious for WLing applicants and because people on TLS are generally paranoid that status checker updates are meaningful in some way.lawschool899 wrote:Why is everyone assuming waitlist with the header change?

- lawschool899
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 4:11 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
makes LOADS of sense now.crumpledq wrote:Also, paranoia is a good way to play the expectations game with yourself. Better to be pleasantly surprised than unexpectedly disappointedcrooked wrote:Because UVA is notorious for WLing applicants and because people on TLS are generally paranoid that status checker updates are meaningful in some way.lawschool899 wrote:Why is everyone assuming waitlist with the header change?

- crooked
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:23 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Ha, I changed my "paranoid" statement right after I wrote it, but I guess you caught me. No offense intendedcrumpledq wrote:Also, paranoia is a good way to play the expectations game with yourself. Better to be pleasantly surprised than unexpectedly disappointedcrooked wrote:Because UVA is notorious for WLing applicants and because people on TLS are generally paranoid that status checker updates are meaningful in some way.lawschool899 wrote:Why is everyone assuming waitlist with the header change?

- jetissent
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 12:33 am
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+1 more for the status change. I didn't write a why UVA because I wagered (correctly, thank goodness) that I'd be T6 secure. I'll probably withdraw shorty WL or not because as much as I love it, I don't see myself in C-ville next year.
At least the adcoms appear to feel about as lukewarm about my application as I am feeling about the prospects of attending! lol
At least the adcoms appear to feel about as lukewarm about my application as I am feeling about the prospects of attending! lol
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crumpledq
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:28 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Ahahahaha!crooked wrote:Ha, I changed my "paranoid" statement right after I wrote it, but I guess you caught me. No offense intendedcrumpledq wrote:Also, paranoia is a good way to play the expectations game with yourself. Better to be pleasantly surprised than unexpectedly disappointedcrooked wrote:Because UVA is notorious for WLing applicants and because people on TLS are generally paranoid that status checker updates are meaningful in some way.lawschool899 wrote:Why is everyone assuming waitlist with the header change?
I fully accept my paranoia. Admitting you have a problem is the first step.
- AmandaPB
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
So true. The schools I didn’t want to actually attend are the ones that haven’t told me anything, yet. Maybe they could sense it in my application!jetissent wrote:+1 more for the status change. I didn't write a why UVA because I wagered (correctly, thank goodness) that I'd be T6 secure. I'll probably withdraw shorty WL or not because as much as I love it, I don't see myself in C-ville next year.
At least the adcoms appear to feel about as lukewarm about my application as I am feeling about the prospects of attending! lol
- so_fetch
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:37 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Same feeling here. My header also changed. Considering what the changes actually were, perhaps this edit to the header was intended only to clarify the process and cut down on questions from applicants. For example the change from 'complete' to 'complete and under consideration' could have been intended just to make people realize that their application was being reviewed and to stop waiting for it to go "under review" or something other than "Complete".Perdevise wrote:Mine went under review as well. I would be unpleasantly surprised by a WL, as UVA seems to have accepted tons with my numbers and I wrote what I believe to be an excellent Why UVA.
- danielhay11
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 8:32 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Did anyone not have the header change? I would imagine it's just a generic status change, since people with complete dates as early as September and as late as mine (mid-November) got the exact same message, and early RD admits have not reported seeing this change..so_fetch wrote:Same feeling here. My header also changed. Considering what the changes actually were, perhaps this edit to the header was intended only to clarify the process and cut down on questions from applicants. For example the change from 'complete' to 'complete and under consideration' could have been intended just to make people realize that their application was being reviewed and to stop waiting for it to go "under review" or something other than "Complete".Perdevise wrote:Mine went under review as well. I would be unpleasantly surprised by a WL, as UVA seems to have accepted tons with my numbers and I wrote what I believe to be an excellent Why UVA.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- franklyscarlet
- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I didn't. Applied October 31stdanielhay11 wrote:Did anyone not have the header change? I would imagine it's just a generic status change, since people with complete dates as early as September and as late as mine (mid-November) got the exact same message, and early RD admits have not reported seeing this change..so_fetch wrote:Same feeling here. My header also changed. Considering what the changes actually were, perhaps this edit to the header was intended only to clarify the process and cut down on questions from applicants. For example the change from 'complete' to 'complete and under consideration' could have been intended just to make people realize that their application was being reviewed and to stop waiting for it to go "under review" or something other than "Complete".Perdevise wrote:Mine went under review as well. I would be unpleasantly surprised by a WL, as UVA seems to have accepted tons with my numbers and I wrote what I believe to be an excellent Why UVA.

edit: oh, nevermind. My RC sucks apparently. I'm UR.
- Unagi
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:55 am
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
mine also changed... complete 10/26
-
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:41 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I was waitlisted a bit ago and my header just changed today from
"Thank you for your commitment to Virginia Law that you have shown by applying as an early decision candidate. We have decided we cannot offer you admission at this time and are placing you on our waiting list"
to
"Thank you for your application to Virgnia Law. At this time, we are placing you on our waiting list"
meaningless?
"Thank you for your commitment to Virginia Law that you have shown by applying as an early decision candidate. We have decided we cannot offer you admission at this time and are placing you on our waiting list"
to
"Thank you for your application to Virgnia Law. At this time, we are placing you on our waiting list"
meaningless?
- so_fetch
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:37 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah... guys, I think these header changes are meaningless. Perhaps they just decided randomly to change the wording. Since there is a new dean this year, maybe she had wanted to change the default header wording and they did not get around to it until now. Basically I don't think we can extrapolate much from this.theduffman wrote:I was waitlisted a bit ago and my header just changed today from
"Thank you for your commitment to Virginia Law that you have shown by applying as an early decision candidate. We have decided we cannot offer you admission at this time and are placing you on our waiting list"
to
"Thank you for your application to Virgnia Law. At this time, we are placing you on our waiting list"
meaningless?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- curiouscat
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 9:57 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
My header changed too. My initial interpretation (before I came here and saw all the waitlist predictions which) was that we were all in some "we'll get to these later" pile and, now that UVA has finished off with some in-target-range people, they're moving on to those of us that were stuck in the back burner. Considering it's UVA, though, waitlist is probably a pretty safe bet.
-
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 11:24 am
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Change here as well, RD out of state with complete email on 9/20. I think this is definitely that "back-burner" pile, and we are now going into committee review.
- cogitoergosum
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:13 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm an early RD applicant (10/25ish) and saw the change.danielhay11 wrote:Did anyone not have the header change? I would imagine it's just a generic status change, since people with complete dates as early as September and as late as mine (mid-November) got the exact same message, and early RD admits have not reported seeing this change..so_fetch wrote:Same feeling here. My header also changed. Considering what the changes actually were, perhaps this edit to the header was intended only to clarify the process and cut down on questions from applicants. For example the change from 'complete' to 'complete and under consideration' could have been intended just to make people realize that their application was being reviewed and to stop waiting for it to go "under review" or something other than "Complete".Perdevise wrote:Mine went under review as well. I would be unpleasantly surprised by a WL, as UVA seems to have accepted tons with my numbers and I wrote what I believe to be an excellent Why UVA.
- Strange
- Posts: 740
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:23 am
Re: UVA c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Was RD complete 11/9, also got the change. Hoping for a quick turnaround, one way or another. Expecting a WL though.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login