Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- kershka

- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Sorry that you're not feeling well Koala, but thanks for the info!
I am less terrified about February arriving, now that I know *coughwildspeculationcough* that rejections don't go out until the later half of the month.
I am less terrified about February arriving, now that I know *coughwildspeculationcough* that rejections don't go out until the later half of the month.
- Sourrudedude

- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:34 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
As soon as calls went out at like 4-5PM west coast time in mid November, I stopped making any assumptions about what SLS was going to do based on what they had done in the past.
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
when you have OCD they do!FuriousDuck wrote:...won't be a problem if you make that prediction every day! Unless, of course, jinxes have the power to hold the Stanford admissions office forever in stasis.scoobers wrote:
only time I'm doing that, folks. I'm a BIG believer in jinxing
no tbh I just find it a teeny bit annoying. I'll have to find my own shtick as the Stanford-thread-resident-Mort
- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
warning: a gif a day keeps the decisions awayscoobers wrote:when you have OCD they do!FuriousDuck wrote:...won't be a problem if you make that prediction every day! Unless, of course, jinxes have the power to hold the Stanford admissions office forever in stasis.scoobers wrote:
only time I'm doing that, folks. I'm a BIG believer in jinxing![]()
no tbh I just find it a teeny bit annoying. I'll have to find my own shtick as the Stanford-thread-resident-Mort
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
barrelofmonkeys wrote:warning: a gif a day keeps the decisions awayscoobers wrote:when you have OCD they do!FuriousDuck wrote:...won't be a problem if you make that prediction every day! Unless, of course, jinxes have the power to hold the Stanford admissions office forever in stasis.scoobers wrote:
only time I'm doing that, folks. I'm a BIG believer in jinxing![]()
no tbh I just find it a teeny bit annoying. I'll have to find my own shtick as the Stanford-thread-resident-Mort

- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
i think you willfully misunderstood mescoobers wrote: howrude.gif
- thechancellor

- Posts: 584
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I don't know what you're on about, I just want my rejection already so that this endless wait is over with!kershka wrote:Sorry that you're not feeling well Koala, but thanks for the info!
I am less terrified about February arriving, now that I know *coughwildspeculationcough* that rejections don't go out until the later half of the month.
-
lawapp2014

- Posts: 35
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Is there any way to send a fourth letter of rec tailored to Stanford after the app is marked complete? Is that even worth it?
- t-14orbust

- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
alex.cm wrote:I don't know what you're on about, I just want my rejection already so that this endless wait is over with!kershka wrote:Sorry that you're not feeling well Koala, but thanks for the info!
I am less terrified about February arriving, now that I know *coughwildspeculationcough* that rejections don't go out until the later half of the month.
- wtrc

- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
¿¿¿ Today ¿¿¿
-
dormgirl76

- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 3:40 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I haven't read back that far, but I was just wondering how long people have been "under review" for?
-
Howl

- Posts: 296
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:11 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
IIRC, some people since mid-late October.dormgirl76 wrote:I haven't read back that far, but I was just wondering how long people have been "under review" for?
- Sourrudedude

- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:34 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Guess not.wtrc wrote:¿¿¿ Today ¿¿¿
- wealtheow

- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
People, please convince me to apply here, before the deadline makes the decision for me. I keep telling myself it isn't worth it w/ my 3.75.
- The-Specs

- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I applied with a 3.58. hthwealtheow wrote:People, please convince me to apply here, before the deadline makes the decision for me. I keep telling myself it isn't worth it w/ my 3.75.
- thechancellor

- Posts: 584
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
3.61 here. just do it, don't you want one more school to fuss over?!The-Specs wrote:I applied with a 3.58. hthwealtheow wrote:People, please convince me to apply here, before the deadline makes the decision for me. I keep telling myself it isn't worth it w/ my 3.75.
edit: also, I've been complete since 10/29
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Applied w/ a 3.6. Didn't want to have to wonder for the rest of my life.wealtheow wrote:People, please convince me to apply here, before the deadline makes the decision for me. I keep telling myself it isn't worth it w/ my 3.75.
- Nonconsecutive

- Posts: 2398
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Do eet, my gpa is under yours and I deed it. For great justice.wealtheow wrote:People, please convince me to apply here, before the deadline makes the decision for me. I keep telling myself it isn't worth it w/ my 3.75.
- JWP1022

- Posts: 269
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:15 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Stanford's app is sooooo easy too. No frills at all. Just do it.
- wealtheow

- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
ok fiiiiiiine.
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?
Apparently they like those, but I couldn't find a professor of mine that was connected to the school in any way so I didn't think it was appropriate.
Apparently they like those, but I couldn't find a professor of mine that was connected to the school in any way so I didn't think it was appropriate.
- nabadgelyo

- Posts: 143
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:58 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Medrawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?
Apparently they like those, but I couldn't find a professor of mine that was connected to the school in any way so I didn't think it was appropriate.
- wealtheow

- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
needless to say having decided to apply about 5 days before the deadline, i do NOT have a tailored LORdrawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?
Apparently they like those, but I couldn't find a professor of mine that was connected to the school in any way so I didn't think it was appropriate.
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
The better question is who did. I wouldn't worry about it.drawstring wrote:So who else here didn't submit a LOR tailored to Furd?
Apparently they like those, but I couldn't find a professor of mine that was connected to the school in any way so I didn't think it was appropriate.
- Vincent

- Posts: 256
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Multiple people were accepted last cycle with <3.7.wealtheow wrote:People, please convince me to apply here, before the deadline makes the decision for me. I keep telling myself it isn't worth it w/ my 3.75.