Yep - RD.msblaw89 wrote:Are you RD? I think it is still going to take a long time to hear back. There are a ton of us who went complete 11/04---> UR 11/28 and have not moved sincenavigator wrote:Also UR today (1/23), with 12/8 complete date.
Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 6:38 am
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- so_fetch
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I am in this boat with you. Grrmsblaw89 wrote:Are you RD? I think it is still going to take a long time to hear back. There are a ton of us who went complete 11/04---> UR 11/28 and have not moved sincenavigator wrote:Also UR today (1/23), with 12/8 complete date.
complete 11/04---> UR 11/28
-
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 12:21 am
- username08
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:10 am
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Finally got my fall grades sent after a PT grades request in early November and a long struggle trying to get my final grade from one of my professors lol. GPA dropped by .01 but at least I'll hear back from them soon.
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:42 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just accepted via PT:
LSAT: 170
GPA: 3.51
applied 1/13 and one of my LoRs is still pending so this is a huge surprise ...
LSAT: 170
GPA: 3.51
applied 1/13 and one of my LoRs is still pending so this is a huge surprise ...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Congrats... and I hate youhanman wrote:Just accepted via PT:
LSAT: 170
GPA: 3.51
applied 1/13 and one of my LoRs is still pending so this is a huge surprise ...
- so_fetch
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Agreed , on both countsmsblaw89 wrote:Congrats... and I hate youhanman wrote:Just accepted via PT:
LSAT: 170
GPA: 3.51
applied 1/13 and one of my LoRs is still pending so this is a huge surprise ...
I feel like such a second class citizen.. I had what I think was good Why Duke and I think my stats should be acceptable

-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:42 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
thanksso_fetch wrote:Agreed , on both countsmsblaw89 wrote:Congrats... and I hate youhanman wrote:Just accepted via PT:
LSAT: 170
GPA: 3.51
applied 1/13 and one of my LoRs is still pending so this is a huge surprise ...
I feel like such a second class citizen.. I had what I think was good Why Duke and I think my stats should be acceptablelike I have said before I probably will not attend but jeez

- MachineLemon
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:47 am
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Submitted my form via email on 1-17. No response/confirmation of receipt. Normal?PopTorts13 wrote:http://www.law.duke.edu/admis/mordecaiElliott_Smith wrote:Wait, where's the scholarship application?
Every other school I applied to says you're considered automatically - but I just went through Duke's app instructions, and there isn't any info at all..
http://www.law.duke.edu/admis/financial/scholarships
EDIT: Looks like forms are submitted after being admitted? However the Mordecai is an automatic consideration, no form needed...
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:21 am
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Re: Scholarships
Has anyone heard back after sending in Merit Only form? Do we know from past years when to expect a response?
Cheers.
Has anyone heard back after sending in Merit Only form? Do we know from past years when to expect a response?
Cheers.
- so_fetch
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Nooo Not way more deserving! You deserve it FOR SURE... Not that everything needs to be a comparison, but I do feel that we have comparable stats and that if you were accepted I hopefully would be too. I just feel like a second class citizen cause my lsat is one point too low (i.e. i did not get PT) to get the attention of duke until who knows when.hanman wrote:thanksso_fetch wrote:Agreed , on both countsmsblaw89 wrote:Congrats... and I hate youhanman wrote:Just accepted via PT:
LSAT: 170
GPA: 3.51
applied 1/13 and one of my LoRs is still pending so this is a huge surprise ...
I feel like such a second class citizen.. I had what I think was good Why Duke and I think my stats should be acceptablelike I have said before I probably will not attend but jeez
i really hope you get some good news from Duke soon. i wish i knew what magic formula got them to offer me PT and then send me an acceptance - i am sure you guys are way more deserving of this!
- cactuarX3
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:51 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Joining the second class citizen group. My LSAT is also 1 point too low for the PT nobility...
-
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:35 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
There's no shame in being part of the proletariat - it builds character.cactuarX3 wrote:Joining the second class citizen group. My LSAT is also 1 point too low for the PT nobility...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
And we are more likely to matriculate hahapotl wrote:There's no shame in being part of the proletariat - it builds character.cactuarX3 wrote:Joining the second class citizen group. My LSAT is also 1 point too low for the PT nobility...
- 6thbackstreetboy
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:57 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
My status checker just updated to today's date from 11/28!! Finally. Hopefully that's a good sign. I'm also one of the "1 point too low for PT" people.
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
LUCKY.. still at 11/286thbackstreetboy wrote:My status checker just updated to today's date from 11/28!! Finally. Hopefully that's a good sign. I'm also one of the "1 point too low for PT" people.
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:18 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Sorry, but what was the LSAT requirement for getting PT (I take it PT means priority track)?cactuarX3 wrote:Joining the second class citizen group. My LSAT is also 1 point too low for the PT nobility...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- so_fetch
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
As far as I know, no one under 170 got priority track invitation.NDIrish2012 wrote:Sorry, but what was the LSAT requirement for getting PT (I take it PT means priority track)?cactuarX3 wrote:Joining the second class citizen group. My LSAT is also 1 point too low for the PT nobility...
- Blessedassurance
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Your sample is unrepresentative.so_fetch wrote: As far as I know, no one under 170 got priority track invitation.
- so_fetch
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I guess when I say "as far as I know", I really mean as far as I know, based on what I remember reading on TLS. I appreciate those who make spreadsheets and track data points similar as this on TLS & elsewhere (LSN etc) but I am not that guy (well I am a girl but that doesn't sound as good) I am going off of my highly flawed memoryBlessedassurance wrote:Your sample is unrepresentative.so_fetch wrote: As far as I know, no one under 170 got priority track invitation.

- Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Are you a jerk in real life or just on the internet?Blessedassurance wrote:Your sample is unrepresentative.so_fetch wrote: As far as I know, no one under 170 got priority track invitation.
@so_fetch: There are two <170 apps on LSN this cycle, both URMs. And there are more than 100 PT apps on LSN, so I'd say your speculation is almost certainly correct that 170 was a cutoff for non-URMs.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:35 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, I don't think it's as cut and dry as an LSAT cut-off (although LSAT seems to play a significant role). I wasn't invited to do Priority Track, but I am 170+ (although I still consider myself part of the proletariat).Nelson wrote:Are you a jerk in real life or just on the internet?Blessedassurance wrote:Your sample is unrepresentative.so_fetch wrote: As far as I know, no one under 170 got priority track invitation.
@so_fetch: There are two <170 apps on LSN this cycle, both URMs. And there are more than 100 PT apps on LSN, so I'd say your speculation is almost certainly correct that 170 was a cutoff for non-URMs.
- Blessedassurance
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I dabble.Nelson wrote: Are you a jerk in real life or just on the internet?
Why didn't he/she say that in the original statement? In any case I know of several sub 170 recipients. That was what I meant by her sample etc etc. I'm sorry I hurt your feelings.@so_fetch: There are two <170 apps on LSN this cycle, both URMs. And there are more than 100 PT apps on LSN, so I'd say your speculation is almost certainly correct that 170 was a cutoff for non-URMs.
- MissElphaba
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:59 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+1bobbydonnelly wrote:Re: Scholarships
Has anyone heard back after sending in Merit Only form? Do we know from past years when to expect a response?
Cheers.
- UtilityMonster
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 3:16 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
You're all wrong.
I was priority track with a 169, non-URM, admitted about five days ago.
I was priority track with a 169, non-URM, admitted about five days ago.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login