Yep - RD.msblaw89 wrote:Are you RD? I think it is still going to take a long time to hear back. There are a ton of us who went complete 11/04---> UR 11/28 and have not moved sincenavigator wrote:Also UR today (1/23), with 12/8 complete date.
Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
-
navigator

- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 6:38 am
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- so_fetch

- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I am in this boat with you. Grrmsblaw89 wrote:Are you RD? I think it is still going to take a long time to hear back. There are a ton of us who went complete 11/04---> UR 11/28 and have not moved sincenavigator wrote:Also UR today (1/23), with 12/8 complete date.
complete 11/04---> UR 11/28
-
Real Madrid

- Posts: 835
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 12:21 am
- username08

- Posts: 126
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:10 am
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Finally got my fall grades sent after a PT grades request in early November and a long struggle trying to get my final grade from one of my professors lol. GPA dropped by .01 but at least I'll hear back from them soon.
-
hanman

- Posts: 97
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:42 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just accepted via PT:
LSAT: 170
GPA: 3.51
applied 1/13 and one of my LoRs is still pending so this is a huge surprise ...
LSAT: 170
GPA: 3.51
applied 1/13 and one of my LoRs is still pending so this is a huge surprise ...
- msblaw89

- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Congrats... and I hate youhanman wrote:Just accepted via PT:
LSAT: 170
GPA: 3.51
applied 1/13 and one of my LoRs is still pending so this is a huge surprise ...
- so_fetch

- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Agreed , on both countsmsblaw89 wrote:Congrats... and I hate youhanman wrote:Just accepted via PT:
LSAT: 170
GPA: 3.51
applied 1/13 and one of my LoRs is still pending so this is a huge surprise ...
I feel like such a second class citizen.. I had what I think was good Why Duke and I think my stats should be acceptable
-
hanman

- Posts: 97
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:42 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
thanksso_fetch wrote:Agreed , on both countsmsblaw89 wrote:Congrats... and I hate youhanman wrote:Just accepted via PT:
LSAT: 170
GPA: 3.51
applied 1/13 and one of my LoRs is still pending so this is a huge surprise ...
I feel like such a second class citizen.. I had what I think was good Why Duke and I think my stats should be acceptablelike I have said before I probably will not attend but jeez
- MachineLemon

- Posts: 375
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:47 am
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Submitted my form via email on 1-17. No response/confirmation of receipt. Normal?PopTorts13 wrote:http://www.law.duke.edu/admis/mordecaiElliott_Smith wrote:Wait, where's the scholarship application?
Every other school I applied to says you're considered automatically - but I just went through Duke's app instructions, and there isn't any info at all..
http://www.law.duke.edu/admis/financial/scholarships
EDIT: Looks like forms are submitted after being admitted? However the Mordecai is an automatic consideration, no form needed...
-
bobbydonnelly

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:21 am
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Re: Scholarships
Has anyone heard back after sending in Merit Only form? Do we know from past years when to expect a response?
Cheers.
Has anyone heard back after sending in Merit Only form? Do we know from past years when to expect a response?
Cheers.
- so_fetch

- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Nooo Not way more deserving! You deserve it FOR SURE... Not that everything needs to be a comparison, but I do feel that we have comparable stats and that if you were accepted I hopefully would be too. I just feel like a second class citizen cause my lsat is one point too low (i.e. i did not get PT) to get the attention of duke until who knows when.hanman wrote:thanksso_fetch wrote:Agreed , on both countsmsblaw89 wrote:Congrats... and I hate youhanman wrote:Just accepted via PT:
LSAT: 170
GPA: 3.51
applied 1/13 and one of my LoRs is still pending so this is a huge surprise ...
I feel like such a second class citizen.. I had what I think was good Why Duke and I think my stats should be acceptablelike I have said before I probably will not attend but jeez
i really hope you get some good news from Duke soon. i wish i knew what magic formula got them to offer me PT and then send me an acceptance - i am sure you guys are way more deserving of this!
- cactuarX3

- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:51 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Joining the second class citizen group. My LSAT is also 1 point too low for the PT nobility...
-
potl

- Posts: 121
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:35 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
There's no shame in being part of the proletariat - it builds character.cactuarX3 wrote:Joining the second class citizen group. My LSAT is also 1 point too low for the PT nobility...
- msblaw89

- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
And we are more likely to matriculate hahapotl wrote:There's no shame in being part of the proletariat - it builds character.cactuarX3 wrote:Joining the second class citizen group. My LSAT is also 1 point too low for the PT nobility...
- 6thbackstreetboy

- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:57 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
My status checker just updated to today's date from 11/28!! Finally. Hopefully that's a good sign. I'm also one of the "1 point too low for PT" people.
- msblaw89

- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
LUCKY.. still at 11/286thbackstreetboy wrote:My status checker just updated to today's date from 11/28!! Finally. Hopefully that's a good sign. I'm also one of the "1 point too low for PT" people.
-
NDIrish2012

- Posts: 141
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:18 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Sorry, but what was the LSAT requirement for getting PT (I take it PT means priority track)?cactuarX3 wrote:Joining the second class citizen group. My LSAT is also 1 point too low for the PT nobility...
- so_fetch

- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
As far as I know, no one under 170 got priority track invitation.NDIrish2012 wrote:Sorry, but what was the LSAT requirement for getting PT (I take it PT means priority track)?cactuarX3 wrote:Joining the second class citizen group. My LSAT is also 1 point too low for the PT nobility...
- Blessedassurance

- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Your sample is unrepresentative.so_fetch wrote: As far as I know, no one under 170 got priority track invitation.
- so_fetch

- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I guess when I say "as far as I know", I really mean as far as I know, based on what I remember reading on TLS. I appreciate those who make spreadsheets and track data points similar as this on TLS & elsewhere (LSN etc) but I am not that guy (well I am a girl but that doesn't sound as good) I am going off of my highly flawed memoryBlessedassurance wrote:Your sample is unrepresentative.so_fetch wrote: As far as I know, no one under 170 got priority track invitation.
- Nelson

- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Are you a jerk in real life or just on the internet?Blessedassurance wrote:Your sample is unrepresentative.so_fetch wrote: As far as I know, no one under 170 got priority track invitation.
@so_fetch: There are two <170 apps on LSN this cycle, both URMs. And there are more than 100 PT apps on LSN, so I'd say your speculation is almost certainly correct that 170 was a cutoff for non-URMs.
-
potl

- Posts: 121
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:35 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, I don't think it's as cut and dry as an LSAT cut-off (although LSAT seems to play a significant role). I wasn't invited to do Priority Track, but I am 170+ (although I still consider myself part of the proletariat).Nelson wrote:Are you a jerk in real life or just on the internet?Blessedassurance wrote:Your sample is unrepresentative.so_fetch wrote: As far as I know, no one under 170 got priority track invitation.
@so_fetch: There are two <170 apps on LSN this cycle, both URMs. And there are more than 100 PT apps on LSN, so I'd say your speculation is almost certainly correct that 170 was a cutoff for non-URMs.
- Blessedassurance

- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I dabble.Nelson wrote: Are you a jerk in real life or just on the internet?
Why didn't he/she say that in the original statement? In any case I know of several sub 170 recipients. That was what I meant by her sample etc etc. I'm sorry I hurt your feelings.@so_fetch: There are two <170 apps on LSN this cycle, both URMs. And there are more than 100 PT apps on LSN, so I'd say your speculation is almost certainly correct that 170 was a cutoff for non-URMs.
- MissElphaba

- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:59 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+1bobbydonnelly wrote:Re: Scholarships
Has anyone heard back after sending in Merit Only form? Do we know from past years when to expect a response?
Cheers.
- UtilityMonster

- Posts: 315
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 3:16 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
You're all wrong.
I was priority track with a 169, non-URM, admitted about five days ago.
I was priority track with a 169, non-URM, admitted about five days ago.