Good luck guys!
Stanford 2010!!! Forum
-
Lysis

- Posts: 190
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 11:10 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I'm not sure; I thought it was pretty random. I wasn't sure if I should say anything because I didn't want to increase anxiety for the rest of the day, but on the other hand I would want to know there was still hope if it was a school I hadn't heard from.
Good luck guys!
Good luck guys!
- WhiskeyGuy

- Posts: 361
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:34 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
FWIW, received mine at 10am EST.
-
chopsticks3092

- Posts: 30
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:04 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
...and mine around 10:30am PST on a Friday.WhiskeyGuy wrote:FWIW, received mine at 10am EST.
- anmo

- Posts: 93
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:50 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Do we know anything as far as a timeline of when we should be hearing back about financial aid? I thought something was mentioned when Dean Deal called, but pretty much everything she said is now a blur.
-
protokurios

- Posts: 196
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 10:49 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I love the new blog entry...it's like they're reading our minds. hahaha
http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/
http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
They are. It's Stanford.protokurios wrote:I love the new blog entry...it's like they're reading our minds. hahaha
http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/
- Legacy316

- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:57 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
...
Last edited by Legacy316 on Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Breathe. Relax. Faye won't mind.Legacy316 wrote:Okay guys, I've seen some URMs get into SLS already with numbers lower than mine and app sent dates later than mine, and I may have just figured out why. I misspelled the name of my high school on my application!!! UGH!! I have NO IDEA how this happened. Up till now, I haven't come across one typo in any of my 12 apps and the one I finally spot is on Stanford's!? WTF!?
- booboo

- Posts: 1032
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Did you really convince yourself that this is what might keep you out of Stanford? managamy's post is TCR.Legacy316 wrote:Okay guys, I've seen some URMs get into SLS already with numbers lower than mine and app sent dates later than mine, and I may have just figured out why. I misspelled the name of my high school on my application!!! UGH!! I have NO IDEA how this happened. Up till now, I haven't come across one typo in any of my 12 apps and the one I finally spot is on Stanford's!? WTF!?
- WhiskeyGuy

- Posts: 361
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:34 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Solid post. Thanks for the reminder to check it out--the blog entries are too infrequent for me to habitually check it everyday.protokurios wrote:I love the new blog entry...it's like they're reading our minds. hahaha
http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Yeah, it's not as if all URMs with 167+, 3.9+ get in to SLS so that garbage about other URMs with similar complete dates and lower scores means literally nothing. If you're going to get in, the typo on your application won't affect anything. If you don't get in, it's not because of the typo.Legacy316 wrote:Okay guys, I've seen some URMs get into SLS already with numbers lower than mine and app sent dates later than mine, and I may have just figured out why. I misspelled the name of my high school on my application!!! UGH!! I have NO IDEA how this happened. Up till now, I haven't come across one typo in any of my 12 apps and the one I finally spot is on Stanford's!? WTF!?
- jsoell

- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:34 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I´m going to add another agreement to the pile. I had the wrong state listed on my application, and it didn´t rule me out.
crackberry wrote:Yeah, it's not as if all URMs with 167+, 3.9+ get in to SLS so that garbage about other URMs with similar complete dates and lower scores means literally nothing. If you're going to get in, the typo on your application won't affect anything. If you don't get in, it's not because of the typo.Legacy316 wrote:Okay guys, I've seen some URMs get into SLS already with numbers lower than mine and app sent dates later than mine, and I may have just figured out why. I misspelled the name of my high school on my application!!! UGH!! I have NO IDEA how this happened. Up till now, I haven't come across one typo in any of my 12 apps and the one I finally spot is on Stanford's!? WTF!?
- Core

- Posts: 890
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
What kind of URM are you? The degree to which SLS needs that kind of URM determines how much of a "boost" you get.Legacy316 wrote:Okay guys, I've seen some URMs get into SLS already with numbers lower than mine and app sent dates later than mine, and I may have just figured out why. I misspelled the name of my high school on my application!!! UGH!! I have NO IDEA how this happened. Up till now, I haven't come across one typo in any of my 12 apps and the one I finally spot is on Stanford's!? WTF!?
I have higher numbers than you and haven't heard back, but I'm PR, so I probably wouldn't get as much of a boost with SLS as you would, if you are MX or AA, for example.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Legacy316

- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:57 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I'm a Mex/Amer URM. I'm thinking/hoping y'all are right about the typo not affecting anything. It's just that the "typo" is a little embarrassing (think along the lines of 'pubic interest') haha. I guess I should just wait until at least April before I really start worrying anyway... and should definitely refrain from looking over my apps at this point (especially at 4am on a weekend)!!! Haha, thanks for the sanity-check everyone!
- Core

- Posts: 890
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Stanford, please call me, if only to say hi. Thanks.
- anmo

- Posts: 93
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:50 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Core wrote:Stanford, please call me, if only to say hi. Thanks.
I hope they tell you more than "hi."
-
BenJ

- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Yeah, that would be really, really depressing. "Oh, sorry, no, you're not admitted, we just wanted to hear your dulcet tones. Best wishes!" *click*anmo wrote:Core wrote:Stanford, please call me, if only to say hi. Thanks.
I hope they tell you more than "hi."
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Laina

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:16 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Just out of curiosity, how do you figure PRs get a smaller boost for Stanford? I figured Mex-Ams would get the smaller boost, since there is a huge Mex-Am population in California, so more applicants that might want to stay in Cali for family reasons.Core wrote:What kind of URM are you? The degree to which SLS needs that kind of URM determines how much of a "boost" you get.Legacy316 wrote:Okay guys, I've seen some URMs get into SLS already with numbers lower than mine and app sent dates later than mine, and I may have just figured out why. I misspelled the name of my high school on my application!!! UGH!! I have NO IDEA how this happened. Up till now, I haven't come across one typo in any of my 12 apps and the one I finally spot is on Stanford's!? WTF!?
I have higher numbers than you and haven't heard back, but I'm PR, so I probably wouldn't get as much of a boost with SLS as you would, if you are MX or AA, for example.
- Core

- Posts: 890
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Just by looking at PR cycles on LSN. There are fewer PRs applying than there are MX, but it appears that the boost is not as large as it is for MX (i.e., anmo).Laina wrote:Just out of curiosity, how do you figure PRs get a smaller boost for Stanford? I figured Mex-Ams would get the smaller boost, since there is a huge Mex-Am population in California, so more applicants that might want to stay in Cali for family reasons.Core wrote:What kind of URM are you? The degree to which SLS needs that kind of URM determines how much of a "boost" you get.Legacy316 wrote:Okay guys, I've seen some URMs get into SLS already with numbers lower than mine and app sent dates later than mine, and I may have just figured out why. I misspelled the name of my high school on my application!!! UGH!! I have NO IDEA how this happened. Up till now, I haven't come across one typo in any of my 12 apps and the one I finally spot is on Stanford's!? WTF!?
I have higher numbers than you and haven't heard back, but I'm PR, so I probably wouldn't get as much of a boost with SLS as you would, if you are MX or AA, for example.
- adameus

- Posts: 719
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Laina wrote:Just out of curiosity, how do you figure PRs get a smaller boost for Stanford? I figured Mex-Ams would get the smaller boost, since there is a huge Mex-Am population in California, so more applicants that might want to stay in Cali for family reasons.Core wrote:What kind of URM are you? The degree to which SLS needs that kind of URM determines how much of a "boost" you get.Legacy316 wrote:Okay guys, I've seen some URMs get into SLS already with numbers lower than mine and app sent dates later than mine, and I may have just figured out why. I misspelled the name of my high school on my application!!! UGH!! I have NO IDEA how this happened. Up till now, I haven't come across one typo in any of my 12 apps and the one I finally spot is on Stanford's!? WTF!?
I have higher numbers than you and haven't heard back, but I'm PR, so I probably wouldn't get as much of a boost with SLS as you would, if you are MX or AA, for example.
The reason Mex-Am's would get a bigger boost is in your post. Since California has a higher Mex-Am population this would mean they would require a larger amount of Mex-Am's in the Stanford class in order to reach the proportion of the general population.
- Hattori Hanzo

- Posts: 659
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:17 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Are you sure URM status is not determined based on national statistics, i.e. percentage of Mexicans in US population? This is the first time I hear about state-level URM.adameus wrote:Laina wrote:Just out of curiosity, how do you figure PRs get a smaller boost for Stanford? I figured Mex-Ams would get the smaller boost, since there is a huge Mex-Am population in California, so more applicants that might want to stay in Cali for family reasons.
The reason Mex-Am's would get a bigger boost is in your post. Since California has a higher Mex-Am population this would mean they would require a larger amount of Mex-Am's in the Stanford class in order to reach the proportion of the general population.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Core

- Posts: 890
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Any Stanford admits today?
-
CordeliusX

- Posts: 251
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:48 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
So SLS is over 50% Mex-Am?adameus wrote:The reason Mex-Am's would get a bigger boost is in your post. Since California has a higher Mex-Am population this would mean they would require a larger amount of Mex-Am's in the Stanford class in order to reach the proportion of the general population.
- adameus

- Posts: 719
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I don't think it's on a state level, but on a national level the # of Mexicans is also higher than the number of puerto ricans. I guess since California has a higher # of mexicans I could see how puerto ricans could get more of a boost if there are very few puerto ricans applying while there could be a large # of Mexicans applying...Hattori Hanzo wrote:Are you sure URM status is not determined based on national statistics, i.e. percentage of Mexicans in US population? This is the first time I hear about state-level URM.adameus wrote:Laina wrote:Just out of curiosity, how do you figure PRs get a smaller boost for Stanford? I figured Mex-Ams would get the smaller boost, since there is a huge Mex-Am population in California, so more applicants that might want to stay in Cali for family reasons.
The reason Mex-Am's would get a bigger boost is in your post. Since California has a higher Mex-Am population this would mean they would require a larger amount of Mex-Am's in the Stanford class in order to reach the proportion of the general population.
- castellon

- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:19 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Is it normal that I applied in early December and still haven't received a "complete" e-mail?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login