Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- chneyo
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
...
Last edited by chneyo on Fri Feb 07, 2014 11:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
¿ tomorrow ?
Also, fun fact: apparently two people on LSN were accepted to Stanford on Friday (but there were no TLS acceptances reported that day).
Also, fun fact: apparently two people on LSN were accepted to Stanford on Friday (but there were no TLS acceptances reported that day).
- kershka
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
What? What were their stats? Need to go check LSN immediately!koalacity wrote:¿ tomorrow ?
Also, fun fact: apparently two people on LSN were accepted to Stanford on Friday (but there were no TLS acceptances reported that day).
All people who are admitted to SLS should be obligated to create a TLS account and let us know so we can get the most out of our tiny sample size

ETA: found the stats. A 177, 4.0 and a 173, 3.8. One submitted in early Oct, the other mid-November
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I think the 30th has traditionally been an acceptance day.
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Further evidence we're secretly the same person (or just have eerily similar thought processes).kershka wrote:What? What were their stats? Need to go check LSN immediately!koalacity wrote:¿ tomorrow ?
Also, fun fact: apparently two people on LSN were accepted to Stanford on Friday (but there were no TLS acceptances reported that day).
All people who are admitted to SLS should be obligated to create a TLS account and let us know so we can get the most out of our tiny sample size
ETA: found the stats. A 177, 4.0 and a 173, 3.8. One submitted in early Oct, the other mid-November
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kershka
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
koalacity wrote:Further evidence we're secretly the same person (or just have eerily similar thought processes).kershka wrote:What? What were their stats? Need to go check LSN immediately!koalacity wrote:¿ tomorrow ?
Also, fun fact: apparently two people on LSN were accepted to Stanford on Friday (but there were no TLS acceptances reported that day).
All people who are admitted to SLS should be obligated to create a TLS account and let us know so we can get the most out of our tiny sample size
ETA: found the stats. A 177, 4.0 and a 173, 3.8. One submitted in early Oct, the other mid-November

However, this means my prediction of Friday calls was accurate! Maybe my further prediction of either Monday or Tuesday and then the 30th will come true as well!
- chneyo
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
...
Last edited by chneyo on Fri Feb 07, 2014 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
- FuriousDuck
- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
- bbkk
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Finally went complete!!! 

- China Spy
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:10 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
How long did it take? I sent mine 10 days ago.bbkk wrote:Finally went complete!!!
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
hiFuriousDuck wrote:It looks we have an opening for the position of "relentlessly positive TLSer," or we do at least as long as Mort remains inactive. Anyone who thinks they're up to the task, please raise your hand.
- bbkk
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Exactly 10 days for me.China Spy wrote:How long did it take? I sent mine 10 days ago.bbkk wrote:Finally went complete!!!
- China Spy
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:10 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Looks like I'm getting dinged =/bbkk wrote:Exactly 10 days for me.China Spy wrote:How long did it take? I sent mine 10 days ago.bbkk wrote:Finally went complete!!!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bbkk
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
China Spy wrote:Looks like I'm getting dinged =/bbkk wrote:Exactly 10 days for me.China Spy wrote:How long did it take? I sent mine 10 days ago.bbkk wrote:Finally went complete!!!
Don't be so pessimistic. According to the spreadsheet, some people took a month to go complete. You'll be fine!

- chneyo
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
...
Last edited by chneyo on Fri Feb 07, 2014 11:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
- waferthinmint
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 6:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
All quiet on the Western front?
-
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:11 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Seems so. Also, reference appreciatedwaferthinmint wrote:All quiet on the Western front?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I just had a missed call and voicemail from a Palo Alto number guys.
It wasn't Stanford.
Wow.
It wasn't Stanford.
Wow.
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Ouch. Just ouchwtrc wrote:I just had a missed call and voicemail from a Palo Alto number guys.
It wasn't Stanford.
Wow.

Soon enough, wtrc!
- waferthinmint
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 6:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Thanks!Howl wrote:Seems so. Also, reference appreciatedwaferthinmint wrote:All quiet on the Western front?

- waferthinmint
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 6:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
That just should not be allowed. I hereby ban all 650 numbers from making any phone calls if they are not SLS.wtrc wrote:I just had a missed call and voicemail from a Palo Alto number guys.
It wasn't Stanford.
Wow.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kershka
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Having a non-SLS 650 number should be a federal crimewtrc wrote:I just had a missed call and voicemail from a Palo Alto number guys.
It wasn't Stanford.
Wow.

Also, if you have any friends from Palo Alto, you should stop being friends until after Stanford admits you. HTH!
-
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:11 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Very disappoint. Much unfulfill. So deception. Wow.wtrc wrote:I just had a missed call and voicemail from a Palo Alto number guys.
It wasn't Stanford.
Wow.
(sorry, whenever I see "wow" nowadays I can only think of the doge meme)
- Jessasaurus
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:02 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
When will the first rejections come out?
- yomisterd
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Finally copped that status checker. Now to only obsessively check three times a... hour.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login