Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
All ridiculously high GPAs for this wave. Fuuuuuuucck.
Come on H, show some love to the GPAs below 25th percentile.
Come on H, show some love to the GPAs below 25th percentile.
- zdamico
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:57 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
This was a pretty quick turnaround, if I'm not mistaken. The next round of interviews are T-Th, and the only day off for Admissions beside Wednesday the 19th is this coming Friday. I know it's a quick turnaround but could this week's hear friday and then next week's hear the following wednesday? I know there were multiple december JS2 dates last year, three or four actually.
Either way I plan on politely asking JS about the timeline tomorrow!
Either way I plan on politely asking JS about the timeline tomorrow!
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Do share whatever you can glean!zdamico wrote:
Either way I plan on politely asking JS about the timeline tomorrow!
- Mr. Elshal
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1shntn wrote:Do share whatever you can glean!zdamico wrote:
Either way I plan on politely asking JS about the timeline tomorrow!
Inside Scoop = Instant Awesomeness
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Maybe there'll be JS1 emails on Friday with a few JS2s thrown in for good measure...zdamico wrote:This was a pretty quick turnaround, if I'm not mistaken. The next round of interviews are T-Th, and the only day off for Admissions beside Wednesday the 19th is this coming Friday. I know it's a quick turnaround but could this week's hear friday and then next week's hear the following wednesday? I know there were multiple december JS2 dates last year, three or four actually.
Either way I plan on politely asking JS about the timeline tomorrow!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 3:49 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Jaqen: Went complete 10/16. JS1 email 11/8. Interview on 11/13. I believe I was one of the "late" JS2's from the first cycle.Jaqen wrote:Congrats everyone!
Nice! When did you apply and how are your softs?absquatulated wrote:JS2! 171/3.94
Softs: last 2 years spent in a top-15 Philosophy PhD program. During college: Philosophy B.A., top-25 undergrad; 3 years' work experience as a small firm legal assistant; 2 years student government and residence hall leadership; 1 semester study abroad.
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
How personalized are the JS1 emails?one_by_one wrote:Maybe there'll be JS1 emails on Friday with a few JS2s thrown in for good measure...zdamico wrote:This was a pretty quick turnaround, if I'm not mistaken. The next round of interviews are T-Th, and the only day off for Admissions beside Wednesday the 19th is this coming Friday. I know it's a quick turnaround but could this week's hear friday and then next week's hear the following wednesday? I know there were multiple december JS2 dates last year, three or four actually.
Either way I plan on politely asking JS about the timeline tomorrow!
Wonder if a machine is the only entity present when they are sent out or if JS has to be present at the time of departure...
Nvm, fck it.
Quoting for myself.helix23 wrote:
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Well, this is interesting. This means that those of us who were passed over originally are still being re-evaluated for possible JS2s before the holds go out in January. In fact, I'd be willing to bet that at least one more of us in this club will hear back in December after these next two weeks of interviews (my money's on elterrible).absquatulated wrote:Jaqen: Went complete 10/16. JS1 email 11/8. Interview on 11/13. I believe I was one of the "late" JS2's from the first cycle.Jaqen wrote:Congrats everyone!
Nice! When did you apply and how are your softs?absquatulated wrote:JS2! 171/3.94
Softs: last 2 years spent in a top-15 Philosophy PhD program. During college: Philosophy B.A., top-25 undergrad; 3 years' work experience as a small firm legal assistant; 2 years student government and residence hall leadership; 1 semester study abroad.
Congrats again!
- banjo
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
What are the initial impressions on JS1-JS2 conversions? Looks pretty good to me, with a couple of really weird/notable exceptions. I know that JS joked about turning away a future president...maybe she's trying to pull it off?
- elterrible78
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:09 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
This would explain Lavitz's current status with the school.banjo wrote:What are the initial impressions on JS1-JS2 conversions? Looks pretty good to me, with a couple of really weird/notable exceptions. I know that JS joked about turning away a future president...maybe she's trying to pull it off?
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:33 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So they've officially starting going below the LSAT median for non-URMs then? Uh-oh. It'll be a bit discouraging if the rest of us don't hear soon...though it seems to show that Harvard isn't all numbers based, since softs seem to matter in certain cases.absquatulated wrote:Jaqen: Went complete 10/16. JS1 email 11/8. Interview on 11/13. I believe I was one of the "late" JS2's from the first cycle.Jaqen wrote:Congrats everyone!
Nice! When did you apply and how are your softs?absquatulated wrote:JS2! 171/3.94
Softs: last 2 years spent in a top-15 Philosophy PhD program. During college: Philosophy B.A., top-25 undergrad; 3 years' work experience as a small firm legal assistant; 2 years student government and residence hall leadership; 1 semester study abroad.
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
S/he has a GPA at the 75th, though, so not all that surprising.Cherries2013 wrote: So they've officially starting going below the LSAT median for non-URMs then? Uh-oh. It'll be a bit discouraging if the rest of us don't hear soon...though it seems to show that Harvard isn't all numbers based, since softs seem to matter in certain cases.
- kingsfield69
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:52 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just finished JS1. Very pleasant experience -- mostly talking about my background/work experience. Only real "questions" were a "why law" type question and a "what are your interests in the law" question. Very conversational and completely relaxed.
Good luck to the rest. And now. Back. to. waiting.
Good luck to the rest. And now. Back. to. waiting.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 3:49 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks! Yes, the JS2 call yesterday took me completely by surprise. I thought I was on indefinite "Hold" like everyone else from the first cycle.Lavitz wrote:Well, this is interesting. This means that those of us who were passed over originally are still being re-evaluated for possible JS2s before the holds go out in January. In fact, I'd be willing to bet that at least one more of us in this club will hear back in December after these next two weeks of interviews (my money's on elterrible).absquatulated wrote:Jaqen: Went complete 10/16. JS1 email 11/8. Interview on 11/13. I believe I was one of the "late" JS2's from the first cycle.Jaqen wrote:Congrats everyone!
Nice! When did you apply and how are your softs?absquatulated wrote:JS2! 171/3.94
Softs: last 2 years spent in a top-15 Philosophy PhD program. During college: Philosophy B.A., top-25 undergrad; 3 years' work experience as a small firm legal assistant; 2 years student government and residence hall leadership; 1 semester study abroad.
Congrats again!
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 3:49 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just to confirm: I'm a male non-URM. I don't think I'm the only below-median LSAT non-URM though; take a look at the other 172s and 171s on TLS Stats who got in.one_by_one wrote:S/he has a GPA at the 75th, though, so not all that surprising.Cherries2013 wrote: So they've officially starting going below the LSAT median for non-URMs then? Uh-oh. It'll be a bit discouraging if the rest of us don't hear soon...though it seems to show that Harvard isn't all numbers based, since softs seem to matter in certain cases.
- zdamico
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:57 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Did anyone who interviewed today ask JS/KB when the next wave would come out? Based on the feel of my interview I decided not to.
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:21 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checking in:
Numbers are below the median. A legacy but i doubt that helps at all. 2+ years WE in finance (no finance background) and a few startups behind me as well. Worse thing that could happen is they say no.
Numbers are below the median. A legacy but i doubt that helps at all. 2+ years WE in finance (no finance background) and a few startups behind me as well. Worse thing that could happen is they say no.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- spicyyoda17
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:02 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Worse thing that could happen = dying from panic attack as you await a JS1 email and even potentially a JS2 call.mgoblue2011 wrote:Checking in:
Numbers are below the median. A legacy but i doubt that helps at all. 2+ years WE in finance (no finance background) and a few startups behind me as well. Worse thing that could happen is they say no.
In other words, welcome to the thread.
- kingsfield69
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:52 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1.zdamico wrote:Did anyone who interviewed today ask JS/KB when the next wave would come out? Based on the feel of my interview I decided not to.
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:21 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
spicyyoda17 wrote:Worse thing that could happen = dying from panic attack as you await a JS1 email and even potentially a JS2 call.mgoblue2011 wrote:Checking in:
Numbers are below the median. A legacy but i doubt that helps at all. 2+ years WE in finance (no finance background) and a few startups behind me as well. Worse thing that could happen is they say no.
In other words, welcome to the thread.
Already experienced that feeling when UMich sent out an email about a twitter Q&A session a little while ago.
- digifly
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:28 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
hahaha +1mgoblue2011 wrote:spicyyoda17 wrote:Worse thing that could happen = dying from panic attack as you await a JS1 email and even potentially a JS2 call.mgoblue2011 wrote:Checking in:
Numbers are below the median. A legacy but i doubt that helps at all. 2+ years WE in finance (no finance background) and a few startups behind me as well. Worse thing that could happen is they say no.
In other words, welcome to the thread.
Already experienced that feeling when UMich sent out an email about a twitter Q&A session a little while ago.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sabanist
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:48 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Honestly it's probably for the best for each individual that no one asks. It could come off as presumptuous and impatient. I know we're all dying to know, but it could really hurt someone's interview and that seems unfair. I doubt they'd even answer it tbh.kingsfield69 wrote:+1.zdamico wrote:Did anyone who interviewed today ask JS/KB when the next wave would come out? Based on the feel of my interview I decided not to.
- kingsfield69
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:52 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I actually have to agree with you, notwithstanding my +1 above. I made the individual decision that I would not ask process questions. I think when you're interviewing for a career field that requires poise, patience, and self-assuredness ... it's just bad form. Not only that, it could annoy JS ... and the difficult truth is that some of these decisions will be very close-run. No point in risking it.sabanist wrote:Honestly it's probably for the best for each individual that no one asks. It could come off as presumptuous and impatient. I know we're all dying to know, but it could really hurt someone's interview and that seems unfair. I doubt they'd even answer it tbh.kingsfield69 wrote:+1.zdamico wrote:Did anyone who interviewed today ask JS/KB when the next wave would come out? Based on the feel of my interview I decided not to.
Now, don't get me wrong. If someone else stumbles upon information that will make watching the water boil 1% more bearable, I will not avert my eyes from the thread.
- honeybadger12
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:40 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Btw what's the over/under on how many +1s for the post congratulating Lavitz on his JS2?
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
lolhoneybadger12 wrote:Btw what's the over/under on how many +1s for the post congratulating Lavitz on his JS2?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login