Argh... my SANITY!!!!crackberry wrote:The pre-2010 batch will be VERY small, if previous years are any indication. Most decisions won't come out until January or later.hoopsguy6 wrote:LSP shows last year's earliest admits were around December 15th-ish.
Stanford 2010!!! Forum
- fidesverita

- Posts: 274
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
- fidesverita

- Posts: 274
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Agreed. I really hope they don't just focus on numbers for the sake of ratings. They'd compromise the quality of the their small entering class to a certain extent. I like the SLS mix as is! They're ahead because they're good... not because they only take people with 99th percentile and above.crackberry wrote:The reason Stanford stays ahead of schools like Columbia with higher LSAT ranges is that its peer ratings are consistently spectacular. Those are enough to keep it in the Top 3 regardless of what they do with the LSAT range.managamy wrote:+1. The distinct difference in their current LSAT ranges is surely enough to keep them at #3 unless they make an effort to raise it, which is unlikely unless they change their admissions philosophy.hoopsguy6 wrote:Legacy316 wrote:Anyone think SLS will make it back up to the number 2 spot this spring?
If they can raise their LSAT range to 170-176 (which I am absolutely confident they can do if they were as #s focused as Columbia or Harvard), I could see them overtaking Harvard.
-
jasmoon

- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:32 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
So I got an e-mail this morning stating my app was under review. I just submitted last week, so that was unexpected, but certainly appreciated. 
-
sneakersboy11

- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:02 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
.
Last edited by sneakersboy11 on Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Ragged wrote:VoidSix wrote:Luckily crackberry and I are Stanford auto-admits. It was hard work overthrowing Sudanese dictators, sweeping the countryside for dangerous landmines, practicing for the LSAT by diagramming logic games with sticks in the desert sand, and running a refugee camp that at capacity held thirty-two thousand; but together we were able to do it.crackberry wrote:The pre-2010 batch will be VERY small, if previous years are any indication. Most decisions won't come out until January or later.hoopsguy6 wrote:LSP shows last year's earliest admits were around December 15th-ish.
I framed Roger Rabbit...
That's not even partially believable.
-
hermione0901

- Posts: 96
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:49 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Dear Santa,
All I want for Christmas is a Stanford admission. I've been very good this year and will continue to be good for the rest of eternity if I just get this one little thing. Please??
All I want for Christmas is a Stanford admission. I've been very good this year and will continue to be good for the rest of eternity if I just get this one little thing. Please??
- Lmao Zedong

- Posts: 381
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:10 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
bummer if he doesn't oblige, because you'll be left with the huge lump of coal that is harvardhermione0901 wrote:Dear Santa,
All I want for Christmas is a Stanford admission. I've been very good this year and will continue to be good for the rest of eternity if I just get this one little thing. Please??
-
hermione0901

- Posts: 96
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:49 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Harvard's great, but it's so very big and cold and coal like! Stanford would be small and warm, like fresh Christmas cookies.GargamelITT wrote:bummer if he doesn't oblige, because you'll be left with the huge lump of coal that is harvardhermione0901 wrote:Dear Santa,
All I want for Christmas is a Stanford admission. I've been very good this year and will continue to be good for the rest of eternity if I just get this one little thing. Please??
- Saya

- Posts: 194
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:33 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
See what you've done JR? You've admitted people who don't even appreciate you. While there are those of us who would remain faithful.hermione0901 wrote:Harvard's great, but it's so very big and cold and coal like! Stanford would be small and warm, like fresh Christmas cookies.GargamelITT wrote:bummer if he doesn't oblige, because you'll be left with the huge lump of coal that is harvardhermione0901 wrote:Dear Santa,
All I want for Christmas is a Stanford admission. I've been very good this year and will continue to be good for the rest of eternity if I just get this one little thing. Please??
Lol, although you've got a point. A Stanford acceptance would be <3 x 1000000.
- Legacy316

- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:57 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Here's the thread from last year:
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2#p1063156
Key points:
- Wednesday, Dec 17th, was the first acceptance
- Area code "650"
- International applicants received emails, not phone calls.
- Very small wave (only 4 in that thread); took almost a month for the second wave to come
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2#p1063156
Key points:
- Wednesday, Dec 17th, was the first acceptance
- Area code "650"
- International applicants received emails, not phone calls.
- Very small wave (only 4 in that thread); took almost a month for the second wave to come
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
+a lot. Well, maybe not eternity, but a while anyway.hermione0901 wrote:Dear Santa,
All I want for Christmas is a Stanford admission. I've been very good this year and will continue to be good for the rest of eternity if I just get this one little thing. Please??
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Bump. We can't let this thread drift out to the second page, can we?
- kurama20

- Posts: 538
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 5:04 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Has anyone on here ever been accepted to Stanford before January?
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
+1. If so, tell us about it.kurama20 wrote:Has anyone on here ever been accepted to Stanford before January?
-
georgina

- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:49 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
ooh my friend was a couple of years ago. he's just what you'd expect him to be-- HYP 3.9, 172, strong softs.kurama20 wrote:Has anyone on here ever been accepted to Stanford before January?
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Maybe you could invite him for a guest lecture on this thread.georgina wrote:ooh my friend was a couple of years ago. he's just what you'd expect him to be-- HYP 3.9, 172, strong softs.kurama20 wrote:Has anyone on here ever been accepted to Stanford before January?
His profile sounds a lot like crackberry...hmmmm.
- joshikousei

- Posts: 189
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:38 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
+1, acquaintance of mine. same stats.georgina wrote:ooh my friend was a couple of years ago. he's just what you'd expect him to be-- HYP 3.9, 172, strong softs.kurama20 wrote:Has anyone on here ever been accepted to Stanford before January?
- Nom Sawyer

- Posts: 913
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:28 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
This is why I don't want to go to Stanford:


- joshikousei

- Posts: 189
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:38 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
.
Last edited by joshikousei on Wed Jan 27, 2010 4:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Dignan

- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Yikes. It's almost as ugly as that sculpture that sits outside of Columbia Law School.SolarWind wrote:This is why I don't want to go to Stanford:
- ChildPlease

- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:42 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
At least that sculpture isn't drunk.Dignan wrote:Yikes. It's almost as ugly as that sculpture that sits outside of Columbia Law School.SolarWind wrote:This is why I don't want to go to Stanford:
- Dignan

- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I'm not so sure. If a sculpture could become intoxicated, it would look like that thing outside of CLS.ChildPlease wrote:At least that sculpture isn't drunk.Dignan wrote: Yikes. It's almost as ugly as that sculpture that sits outside of Columbia Law School.
- GeePee

- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:35 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
They're the fucking Cardinals; why do they insist on having a maniacal walking evergreen for a mascot?SolarWind wrote:This is why I don't want to go to Stanford:
- ChildPlease

- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:42 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
CardinAL. No s. That should be an auto rejectGeePee wrote:They're the fucking Cardinals; why do they insist on having a maniacal walking evergreen for a mascot?SolarWind wrote:This is why I don't want to go to Stanford:
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Slightly higher LSAT. But I can dream!!managamy wrote:Maybe you could invite him for a guest lecture on this thread.georgina wrote:ooh my friend was a couple of years ago. he's just what you'd expect him to be-- HYP 3.9, 172, strong softs.kurama20 wrote:Has anyone on here ever been accepted to Stanford before January?![]()
His profile sounds a lot like crackberry...hmmmm.