Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:08 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Checking in!
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Hot damn there are some good numbers ITT.
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by The-Specs on Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:56 am, edited 2 times in total.
- ArtistOfManliness
- Posts: 590
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I love how more than 1/2 of the applicants are above SLS' 75th percentile LSAT... GPA FTW
- Sourrudedude
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:34 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I thought so too, so I threw some rough averages into myLSN and it returned some BS like 29%.t-14orbust wrote:Hot damn there are some good numbers ITT.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
If SLS wanted high LSATs their 75th would be higher. They don't seem to put too much emphasis on it IMOThe-Specs wrote:Don't remind me, I am sitting in that red block.t-14orbust wrote:Hot damn there are some good numbers ITT.
ETA: I am impressed that there aren't any red or even orange LSATs. Makes me nervous to be honest.
edit: Here's something to scare yourself with: if so many of us are above the 75th%, that means we're all kind of competing for the same 25% of spots. Of course that's probably erroneous logic
Last edited by t-14orbust on Fri Aug 09, 2013 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by The-Specs on Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
lol check the edit
- charlie.black
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 3:11 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Yale is some odd little dream most ppl don't take too seriously. So, Harvard or Stanford? And why please.
- Sourrudedude
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:34 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
But doesn't TLS have disproportionately high LSAT scores compared to GPA?
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
As I said, probably erroneous logic lol. For me SLS>HLS barring considerably more $$ from H. Why? Smaller class size, I want to work in California, California weather, California girls. Though dropping the H bomb would be awesome.
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by The-Specs on Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by The-Specs on Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
lol I'll take it. For some reassurance it probably was a good idea for you to forgo that Iowa ride considering the continual drop in applicants, especially the higher LSATs. Sure, you might not get SLS or HLS but you will definitely have good options.The-Specs wrote:I'll make you a deal. When you get into both I will take your Harvard acceptance and you can go to Stanford. What do you get in return...well nothing but this is why this is a great deal.t-14orbust wrote:As I said, probably erroneous logic lol. For me SLS>HLS barring considerably more $$ from H. Why? Smaller class size, I want to work in California, California weather, California girls. Though dropping the H bomb would be awesome.
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by The-Specs on Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- CyanIdes Of March
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I've dreamed of Harvard for a while now, but I think YLS and SLS don't get my attention as much because deep down I know it's not going to happen. Stanford could pull through for me, but it's just way too variable to put much hope into. But man would I love to spend 3 years in Palo Alto.t-14orbust wrote:As I said, probably erroneous logic lol. For me SLS>HLS barring considerably more $$ from H. Why? Smaller class size, I want to work in California, California weather, California girls. Though dropping the H bomb would be awesome.
- ArtistOfManliness
- Posts: 590
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Everyone has always wanted to go to Harvard... it's during the researching law schools process that YLS and SLS emerge from the woodwork.CyanIdes Of March wrote:I've dreamed of Harvard for a while now, but I think YLS and SLS don't get my attention as much because deep down I know it's not going to happen. Stanford could pull through for me, but it's just way too variable to put much hope into. But man would I love to spend 3 years in Palo Alto.t-14orbust wrote:As I said, probably erroneous logic lol. For me SLS>HLS barring considerably more $$ from H. Why? Smaller class size, I want to work in California, California weather, California girls. Though dropping the H bomb would be awesome.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by The-Specs on Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
This. Everyone I know(that I haven't told otherwise) is under the impression that HLS is the best law school.ArtistOfManliness wrote:Everyone has always wanted to go to Harvard... it's during the researching law schools process that YLS and SLS emerge from the woodwork.CyanIdes Of March wrote:I've dreamed of Harvard for a while now, but I think YLS and SLS don't get my attention as much because deep down I know it's not going to happen. Stanford could pull through for me, but it's just way too variable to put much hope into. But man would I love to spend 3 years in Palo Alto.t-14orbust wrote:As I said, probably erroneous logic lol. For me SLS>HLS barring considerably more $$ from H. Why? Smaller class size, I want to work in California, California weather, California girls. Though dropping the H bomb would be awesome.
- ArtistOfManliness
- Posts: 590
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
How I pity you... stuck going to Harvard.The-Specs wrote:
I guess I am the weird kid that always wanted Yale. That being said I think I have as close to a flawless applicaiton as possible (in terms of LoR, essays and Softs that I can control) but my GPA will keep me out of Yale and SLS so HLS is probably my only choice.
That is the only negative about choosing SLS over HLS - lay prestige/picking up chicks/impressing randost-14orbust wrote:
This. Everyone I know(that I haven't told otherwise) is under the impression that HLS is the best law school.
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
How lay-prestigious is it to tell people that you denied HLS? lolArtistOfManliness wrote:How I pity you... stuck going to Harvard.The-Specs wrote:
I guess I am the weird kid that always wanted Yale. That being said I think I have as close to a flawless applicaiton as possible (in terms of LoR, essays and Softs that I can control) but my GPA will keep me out of Yale and SLS so HLS is probably my only choice.
That is the only negative about choosing SLS over HLS - lay prestige/picking up chicks/impressing randost-14orbust wrote:
This. Everyone I know(that I haven't told otherwise) is under the impression that HLS is the best law school.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Dr. Dre
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:10 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
California girls aren't that great bro.
The hottest girls are southern girls (i.e., those that attend SEC schools)
HTH
The hottest girls are southern girls (i.e., those that attend SEC schools)
HTH
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by The-Specs on Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
- ArtistOfManliness
- Posts: 590
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
It doesn't usually come up... I can't be like, "Yo, I go to SLS, but I tots denied HLS." I can only play the denied HLS card if they, usually in a joking manner, are like, "what, you couldn't get into HLS?"/"well pearsont-14orbust wrote: How lay-prestigious is it to tell people that you denied HLS? lol
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by The-Specs on Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login