Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
alwayssunnyinfl

Gold
Posts: 4100
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by alwayssunnyinfl » Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:36 pm

yankihote wrote:
bernaldiaz wrote:
Is it bad that I get psyched every time I see someone with a 173+ who has a below HYS median GPA?
Why's that if I may ask?
I guess his app is that bland and uninteresting that he's afraid of not getting into HYS even though he has the numbers to make him a lock.

yankihote

New
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:05 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by yankihote » Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:45 pm

alwayssunnyinfl wrote:
yankihote wrote:
bernaldiaz wrote:
Is it bad that I get psyched every time I see someone with a 173+ who has a below HYS median GPA?
Why's that if I may ask?
I guess his app is that bland and uninteresting that he's afraid of not getting into HYS even though he has the numbers to make him a lock.
Hmm, alright. I don't see how my application would have any influence over his, but maybe he thinks that if HYS has more applicants with above median LSAT's but below median GPA's, they are more likely to balance things out with above or at median GPAs even if the LSAT's are at or below medians.

User avatar
alwayssunnyinfl

Gold
Posts: 4100
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by alwayssunnyinfl » Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:47 pm

yankihote wrote: Hmm, alright. I don't see how my application would have any influence over his, but maybe he thinks that if HYS has more applicants with above median LSAT's but below median GPA's, they are more likely to balance things out with above or at median GPAs even if the LSAT's are at or below medians.
No, he really is set numbers-wise. If he doesn't get one of HYS, it won't be for want of better numbers.

But I don't know his personal story, so I'm not going to pass any more judgment. I was just speculating.

yankihote

New
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:05 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by yankihote » Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:50 pm

Right.

Have you submitted yet? I finished Chicago's today.

What's your top pick school?

User avatar
bernaldiaz

Gold
Posts: 1674
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by bernaldiaz » Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:01 pm

alwayssunnyinfl wrote:
yankihote wrote:
bernaldiaz wrote:
Is it bad that I get psyched every time I see someone with a 173+ who has a below HYS median GPA?
Why's that if I may ask?
I guess his app is that bland and uninteresting that he's afraid of not getting into HYS even though he has the numbers to make him a lock.
Dead on.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by BigZuck » Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:02 pm

alwayssunnyinfl wrote:
yankihote wrote: Hmm, alright. I don't see how my application would have any influence over his, but maybe he thinks that if HYS has more applicants with above median LSAT's but below median GPA's, they are more likely to balance things out with above or at median GPAs even if the LSAT's are at or below medians.
No, he really is set numbers-wise. If he doesn't get one of HYS, it won't be for want of better numbers.

But I don't know his personal story, so I'm not going to pass any more judgment. I was just speculating.
Word. I'm getting tired of watching him and the 3.95/178 stroke each other's egos off up and down TLS. Maybe I just mad, who knows?

Also, checking in. Chicago would be great but it's a super duper longshot at this point.

User avatar
bernaldiaz

Gold
Posts: 1674
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by bernaldiaz » Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:04 pm

BigZuck wrote:
alwayssunnyinfl wrote:
yankihote wrote: Hmm, alright. I don't see how my application would have any influence over his, but maybe he thinks that if HYS has more applicants with above median LSAT's but below median GPA's, they are more likely to balance things out with above or at median GPAs even if the LSAT's are at or below medians.
No, he really is set numbers-wise. If he doesn't get one of HYS, it won't be for want of better numbers.

But I don't know his personal story, so I'm not going to pass any more judgment. I was just speculating.
Word. I'm getting tired of watching him and the 3.95/178 stroke each other's egos off up and down TLS. Maybe I just mad, who knows?

Also, checking in. Chicago would be great but it's a super duper longshot at this point.
LOL sorry will bow out for a while. Frankly, I'm annoying myself.

yankihote

New
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:05 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by yankihote » Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:07 pm

BigZuck wrote:
alwayssunnyinfl wrote:
yankihote wrote: Hmm, alright. I don't see how my application would have any influence over his, but maybe he thinks that if HYS has more applicants with above median LSAT's but below median GPA's, they are more likely to balance things out with above or at median GPAs even if the LSAT's are at or below medians.
No, he really is set numbers-wise. If he doesn't get one of HYS, it won't be for want of better numbers.

But I don't know his personal story, so I'm not going to pass any more judgment. I was just speculating.
Word. I'm getting tired of watching him and the 3.95/178 stroke each other's egos off up and down TLS. Maybe I just mad, who knows?

Also, checking in. Chicago would be great but it's a super duper longshot at this point.
Consider Ed'ing? Just a thought.

Don't let it get you down. Think of it this way: If the top schools get their 4.0/180 or close acceptances out of the way, they will have more room to offer admission to others with below median numbers. There is some talk that the applicant pool is smaller/less number-maxed, which if true would bode well for you.

User avatar
MarkKnows87

New
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:24 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by MarkKnows87 » Sat Sep 22, 2012 12:14 am

Checking in. I want to wish everyone luck on their cycles

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
geary86

Bronze
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:09 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by geary86 » Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:15 pm

checking in. good luck to everyone :D

Foreigner_Rocks

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:39 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Foreigner_Rocks » Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:22 pm

Good luck to all of you. I'm a 1L and love it so far (although classes haven't started). I lurked for quite a while and got so much great advice, so I'm happy to answer any questions y'all have about the school, etc.

FWIW, I was a splitter way under the GPA 25% and at median for LSAT. It can be done with a good application.

User avatar
Yukos

Gold
Posts: 1774
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Yukos » Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:00 am

Checking in, love Chi's small class size, cheap city and great clerkship numbers. Really excited!

shntn

Platinum
Posts: 5319
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by shntn » Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:06 am

Yukos wrote:Checking in, love Chi's small class size, cheap city and great clerkship numbers. Really excited!
Well, I wouldn't call it cheap, but still. Very exciting indeed!

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Yukos

Gold
Posts: 1774
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Yukos » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:48 am

shntn wrote:
Yukos wrote:Checking in, love Chi's small class size, cheap city and great clerkship numbers. Really excited!
Well, I wouldn't call it cheap, but still. Very exciting indeed!
Well I live in New York right now so...

shntn

Platinum
Posts: 5319
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by shntn » Mon Sep 24, 2012 9:01 am

Yukos wrote:
shntn wrote:
Yukos wrote:Checking in, love Chi's small class size, cheap city and great clerkship numbers. Really excited!
Well, I wouldn't call it cheap, but still. Very exciting indeed!
Well I live in New York right now so...
My condolences, and I stand corrected.

User avatar
shifty_eyed

Gold
Posts: 1925
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by shifty_eyed » Tue Sep 25, 2012 4:04 pm

New medians are up.

LSAT: 171 (25th 167 / 75th 173) :?
GPA: 3.90 (25th 3.65 / 75th 3.96) :shock:

Does anyone know what last years' were?

--LinkRemoved--

User avatar
Bildungsroman

Platinum
Posts: 5529
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Bildungsroman » Tue Sep 25, 2012 4:15 pm

shifty_eyed wrote:New medians are up.

LSAT: 171 (25th 167 / 75th 173) :?
GPA: 3.90 (25th 3.65 / 75th 3.96) :shock:

Does anyone know what last years' were?

--LinkRemoved--
Here's last year's profile card: --LinkRemoved--

Edit: Also, as this is my first time posting in this thread: good luck to all applicants this year!

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
UtilityMonster

Bronze
Posts: 315
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 3:16 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by UtilityMonster » Wed Sep 26, 2012 2:59 pm

From the look of class sizes and numbers, Chicago looks at least as difficult to get into as Columbia, if not more difficult.

What, with 25% of the class having a 3.96+ GPA and 50% having a 3.9+.

User avatar
spicyyoda17

Bronze
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:02 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by spicyyoda17 » Mon Oct 01, 2012 12:25 pm

Just a heads up to anybody still waiting on a fee waiver. I did not get one in the first batch but checked again this morning and noticed a hidden fee waiver waiting for me (it was not there as of last week). It looks like maybe with the new month they released some more waivers for students still waiting to apply.

User avatar
06102016

Diamond
Posts: 13460
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:29 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by 06102016 » Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:13 pm

..

User avatar
banjo

Silver
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by banjo » Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:50 am

Last year I (and several others) predicted that Chicago would overtake Columbia in the rankings. That did not materialize, but it could still happen this year.

(1) Chicago's GPA median inched up from a 3.87,
(2) Expenditures/student will increase due to the Ruby and a lower class size (maybe more "scholarship" money too, judging by the end of the previous cycle)
(3) At least one major new lateral (Eduardo Penalver).
(4) Columbia and Chicago have the same peer and lawyer/judge scores and differ by only a point in raw scores (94 and 93, respectively), so luck could play a role too.

Note that Columbia also saw a huge reduction in class size (close to 10%), so that might cancel out Chicago's advantages this year. The only reason you should care is because applicants do respond to rankings and a shift could change the way the waitlist plays out.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Kionaltski

New
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:23 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Kionaltski » Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:25 pm

Hey, I noticed something funny. In my status checker, there's a new line under the Applicant Fee which says "class deposit"...0.00... .00 Is this just something that happens when you go complete? I was already complete for some time...

User avatar
MayBJack426

New
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 6:28 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by MayBJack426 » Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:28 pm

Kionaltski wrote:Hey, I noticed something funny. In my status checker, there's a new line under the Applicant Fee which says "class deposit"...0.00... .00 Is this just something that happens when you go complete? I was already complete for some time...
Hm..mine says the same thing. I just checked 2 other status checkers that are also complete, and this is not included. again, hmmm...

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Rahviveh » Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:31 pm

MayBJack426 wrote:
Kionaltski wrote:Hey, I noticed something funny. In my status checker, there's a new line under the Applicant Fee which says "class deposit"...0.00... .00 Is this just something that happens when you go complete? I was already complete for some time...
Hm..mine says the same thing. I just checked 2 other status checkers that are also complete, and this is not included. again, hmmm...
Makes no difference

User avatar
spicyyoda17

Bronze
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:02 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by spicyyoda17 » Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:32 pm

MayBJack426 wrote:
Kionaltski wrote:Hey, I noticed something funny. In my status checker, there's a new line under the Applicant Fee which says "class deposit"...0.00... .00 Is this just something that happens when you go complete? I was already complete for some time...
Hm..mine says the same thing. I just checked 2 other status checkers that are also complete, and this is not included. again, hmmm...
I am all for reading into things, but! This means nothing. Sorry :)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”