Is it really YP though? For the evidence to support that there would have to be data to suggest that weaker candidates have a better chance. I don't know if that's the case - Penn seems rather selective possibly due to the small class size compared to its peers and doesn't seem to really like RD splitters in general.ChampagnePapi wrote:Yes, Penn is notorious for YPing high-LSAT splitters.canarykb wrote:I looked at the list there and only one person with a 176 get in, and they had a 3.3 GPA; the rest were mostly waitlisted. YP, right?
Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle) Forum
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
A lot of this WLs don't even look like splitters. Look at these WL numbers from 2011-2012:Crowing wrote:Is it really YP though? For the evidence to support that there would have to be data to suggest that weaker candidates have a better chance. I don't know if that's the case - Penn seems rather selective possibly due to the small class size compared to its peers and doesn't seem to really like RD splitters in general.ChampagnePapi wrote:Yes, Penn is notorious for YPing high-LSAT splitters.canarykb wrote:I looked at the list there and only one person with a 176 get in, and they had a 3.3 GPA; the rest were mostly waitlisted. YP, right?
177 3.86
177 3.89
177 3.83
177 3.81
177 3.76
177 3.8
176 3.81
176 3.89
176 3.73
176 3.73
175 3.97
175 3.75
175 3.81
174 3.83
174 3.86
etc...
-
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:36 pm
Post removed..
Post removed..
Last edited by VasaVasori on Fri May 08, 2015 4:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Is there any way to separate the ED from that though? Penn gives a huge ED boost and my sense is that lower number applicants tend to ED a lot more. Penn RD is not really a true lock for anyone.VasaVasori wrote:Check out this graph: http://mylsn.info/graph.php?school=pennCrowing wrote:Is it really YP though? For the evidence to support that there would have to be data to suggest that weaker candidates have a better chance. I don't know if that's the case - Penn seems rather selective possibly due to the small class size compared to its peers and doesn't seem to really like RD splitters in general.ChampagnePapi wrote:Yes, Penn is notorious for YPing high-LSAT splitters.canarykb wrote:I looked at the list there and only one person with a 176 get in, and they had a 3.3 GPA; the rest were mostly waitlisted. YP, right?
There's clearly this little hole that Penn likes to accept from, with an area both above and below it that they waitlist/reject.
-
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 11:20 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
also interested in this.... how huge of a boost does penn giveCrowing wrote:
Is there any way to separate the ED from that though? Penn gives a huge ED boost and my sense is that lower number applicants tend to ED a lot more. Penn RD is not really a true lock for anyone.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
I just logged into the status checker for the first time in weeks and found that I am UCR 11/1.
Also, it looks like the status checker finally updated to clear last year's cycle. I stopped checking it because I would get heart attacks every time I logged in upon seeing "Application Denied." Even when I knew it was coming it still had momentary impact
Also, it looks like the status checker finally updated to clear last year's cycle. I stopped checking it because I would get heart attacks every time I logged in upon seeing "Application Denied." Even when I knew it was coming it still had momentary impact

-
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:26 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Penn ED is really good for splitters, not so much for reverse-splitters. 3.3+ and 170+ and you're in (look at LSN; 99% of people with those stats are in). Slightly lower GPA may work with a 175+ or so. Wouldn't bother EDing as a reverse splitter or even with a 168/169.comeonletsgo wrote:also interested in this.... how huge of a boost does penn giveCrowing wrote:
Is there any way to separate the ED from that though? Penn gives a huge ED boost and my sense is that lower number applicants tend to ED a lot more. Penn RD is not really a true lock for anyone.
-
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 11:20 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
yikes - yeah penn seems to know what they want and doesn't seem to want to deviate from that. hoping to be WLed and not outright rejectedSportsFan wrote:Penn ED is really good for splitters, not so much for reverse-splitters. 3.3+ and 170+ and you're in (look at LSN; 99% of people with those stats are in). Slightly lower GPA may work with a 175+ or so. Wouldn't bother EDing as a reverse splitter or even with a 168/169.comeonletsgo wrote:also interested in this.... how huge of a boost does penn giveCrowing wrote:
Is there any way to separate the ED from that though? Penn gives a huge ED boost and my sense is that lower number applicants tend to ED a lot more. Penn RD is not really a true lock for anyone.
-
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:32 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Checking in! Submitted tonight. It is a long shot but I had a fee waiver and I would love to attend.
Good luck everyone!
Good luck everyone!
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:32 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Is this the first year Penn has done this two-phase Binding ED? Think it's possible to RD and then change to ED come first week of January after already having heard back from a couple of schools in December?
-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 8:25 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Mind sharing when did you apply?Crowing wrote:I just logged into the status checker for the first time in weeks and found that I am UCR 11/1.
Also, it looks like the status checker finally updated to clear last year's cycle. I stopped checking it because I would get heart attacks every time I logged in upon seeing "Application Denied." Even when I knew it was coming it still had momentary impact
- NoodleyOne
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 7:32 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Officially checked in. My application is in. Hope they love splitters.
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Submitted 9/18 and complete 9/21Just wrote:Mind sharing when did you apply?Crowing wrote:I just logged into the status checker for the first time in weeks and found that I am UCR 11/1.
Also, it looks like the status checker finally updated to clear last year's cycle. I stopped checking it because I would get heart attacks every time I logged in upon seeing "Application Denied." Even when I knew it was coming it still had momentary impact
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 8:25 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
RD?Crowing wrote:Submitted 9/18 and complete 9/21Just wrote:Mind sharing when did you apply?Crowing wrote:I just logged into the status checker for the first time in weeks and found that I am UCR 11/1.
Also, it looks like the status checker finally updated to clear last year's cycle. I stopped checking it because I would get heart attacks every time I logged in upon seeing "Application Denied." Even when I knew it was coming it still had momentary impact
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
ED sorryJust wrote:RD?Crowing wrote:Submitted 9/18 and complete 9/21Just wrote:Mind sharing when did you apply?Crowing wrote:I just logged into the status checker for the first time in weeks and found that I am UCR 11/1.
Also, it looks like the status checker finally updated to clear last year's cycle. I stopped checking it because I would get heart attacks every time I logged in upon seeing "Application Denied." Even when I knew it was coming it still had momentary impact
- Shooter
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
+1 for "hole theory."VasaVasori wrote:Check out this graph: http://mylsn.info/graph.php?school=pennCrowing wrote:Is it really YP though? For the evidence to support that there would have to be data to suggest that weaker candidates have a better chance. I don't know if that's the case - Penn seems rather selective possibly due to the small class size compared to its peers and doesn't seem to really like RD splitters in general.ChampagnePapi wrote:Yes, Penn is notorious for YPing high-LSAT splitters.canarykb wrote:I looked at the list there and only one person with a 176 get in, and they had a 3.3 GPA; the rest were mostly waitlisted. YP, right?
There's clearly this little hole that Penn likes to accept from, with an area both above and below it that they waitlist/reject.
- Eichörnchen
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:51 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Submitted (finally). 

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:16 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Hey guys! I'm looking for some advice as far as Penn is concerned. I have a 3.9 from a top 20 school and a pretty unconventional path to my degree. I'm already in at a t-14 but Penn is my first choice.
Last edited by wetalkinboutpractice on Fri Jun 24, 2016 11:44 am, edited 2 times in total.
- justonemoregame
- Posts: 1156
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:51 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Yeah depending on your score though, I wouldn't ED - you'd be leaving some money on the table with 170/3.9
- Mr. Elshal
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Checking in.
- MsAvocadoPit
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:20 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
.
Last edited by MsAvocadoPit on Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1862
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:36 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Checking in. Applied last night with fee waiver. LSAT is around median, GPA is above, so I might have a decent shot. Didn't write any extra stuff.
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 4:12 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Checking in, too. I ED'd last week as a reverse splitter.
- NoodleyOne
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 7:32 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
I looked on mylsn and it looks like I'm probably going to get YP'd...
I hate YP.
I hate YP.
- venus
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Maybe not, because of your not too high GPA. Or write a good "Why Penn" if you really want to go there.NoodleyOne wrote:I looked on mylsn and it looks like I'm probably going to get YP'd...
I hate YP.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login