URM?MumofCad wrote:Hey, don't sell my kid short, T-5 all the way
Seriously though, he speaks Chinese and I would like to continue him in an immersion program. For some reason, they hold the lotteries for the programs in most cities in January. I have to prove potential residency by then (ie. signed lease) to enter him. I guess they take the wait-list pretty seriously for kindergartens these days. Who knew. No transfer option after 1K either.
Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- j12
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 3:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
does URM get a boost in K admissions?JamMasterJ wrote:URM?MumofCad wrote:Hey, don't sell my kid short, T-5 all the way
blahblahblahmykidhasgreatsofts I guess they take the wait-list pretty seriously for kindergartens these days. Who knew. No transfer option after 1K either.
Also, softs don't matter. You sound like taxguy talking about his son. Also, he shouldn't go to a K school planning on transferring out. It's almost impossible to know how you will perform in Kindergarten having no previous experience at anything like it. The tests are different than preschool. Have you considered having him ED anywhere?
seriously though, your kid sounds impressive.
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Actually, in the preschool world of Chinese immersion, yes, he was a URM. Being a white male, he was boosted over 15 Chinese/part-Chinese families to meet the school's diversity considerations (I am not kidding). It was probably my first and last taste of the diversity boost - so sweet.JamMasterJ wrote: URM?
Oh and yes, he has amazing softs. He's only 4 and he can almost do an unassisted headstand. That's practically a Gold medal in the eyes of his friends.
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I think you're about the only person who makes talking about his kid interesting to other peopleMumofCad wrote:Actually, in the preschool world of Chinese immersion, yes, he was a URM. Being a white male, he was boosted over 15 Chinese/part-Chinese families to meet the school's diversity considerations (I am not kidding). It was probably my first and last taste of the diversity boost - so sweet.JamMasterJ wrote: URM?
Oh and yes, he has amazing softs. He's only 4 and he can almost do an unassisted headstand. That's practically a Gold medal in the eyes of his friends.

- $1.99
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
joining you guys here
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Chicago application is available now. I'm filling it out now.
- Xifeng
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
So, so proud <3Hawkeye Pierce wrote:Chicago application is available now. I'm filling it out now.
- Samara
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm planning to apply ED to Chicago, but taking the LSAT in October. Obviously, I won't get fee waivers until after my score comes back. So, two questions: Can I get a merit waiver to Chicago as an ED splitter? If so, can I start filling out my application through LSAC now and apply the fee waiver later, or should I wait until I get a decision on a fee waiver to start it?Hawkeye Pierce wrote:Chicago application is available now. I'm filling it out now.
- Xifeng
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Their fee waiver stuff is kind of random. I didn't get one, but someone else with the same LSAT score did. And I'm pretty sure all the fee waiver stuff is at the end so you should be able to start it now.Samara wrote:I'm planning to apply ED to Chicago, but taking the LSAT in October. Obviously, I won't get fee waivers until after my score comes back. So, two questions: Can I get a merit waiver to Chicago as an ED splitter? If so, can I start filling out my application through LSAC now and apply the fee waiver later, or should I wait until I get a decision on a fee waiver to start it?Hawkeye Pierce wrote:Chicago application is available now. I'm filling it out now.
- tmon
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:52 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
If I were to start an ED application and end up deciding to go RD (pending October LSAT) I can switch right? Seems like that would make sense, but just want to make sure.
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
<3Xifeng wrote:So, so proud <3Hawkeye Pierce wrote:Chicago application is available now. I'm filling it out now.

- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Oh lord this thread's going to spend the next 9 months in my recent posts feed.
- Xifeng
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I actually don't know. I think last year you couldn't. I'd email LSAC and check before you start anythingtmon wrote:If I were to start an ED application and end up deciding to go RD (pending October LSAT) I can switch right? Seems like that would make sense, but just want to make sure.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Might start filling it out tonight.
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 11:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
So in part 5 "education," should we include secondary schools attended under institutions? What about high school academic awards in the awards section?
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I just added the secondary school to the Additional Demographics section, not under the education section.bball1997 wrote:So in part 5 "education," should we include secondary schools attended under institutions? What about high school academic awards in the awards section?
And, hell no. Nobody cares about high school awards.
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
More like you will.soj wrote:Might start filling it out tonight.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Quick question. Started filling out the application basics. What about the question what other law schools are you applying to? What's the correct answer?
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I went ahead and listed the other schools I'm applying to.sea15 wrote:Quick question. Started filling out the application basics. What about the question what other law schools are you applying to? What's the correct answer?
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm looking at the app from last year and don't see this question, so I'm not sure what I put (which would of course be the credited response). Sorry :/sea15 wrote:Quick question. Started filling out the application basics. What about the question what other law schools are you applying to? What's the correct answer?
- Xifeng
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I looked at HP's and this year's is COMPLETELY different (we didn't have that question). I think people on TLS think that when lower-tiered schools ask this question, they're trying to figure out how seriously you're taking that school, but Chicago is pretty high up there so no clue why they want to know.Bildungsroman wrote:I'm looking at the app from last year and don't see this question, so I'm not sure what I put (which would of course be the credited response). Sorry :/sea15 wrote:Quick question. Started filling out the application basics. What about the question what other law schools are you applying to? What's the correct answer?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- acadec
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 2:35 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
What's the consensus on whether you want the scholarship committee to consider need? Yes unless you're super rich? No unless you're super poor?
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Thanks. I'm kind of applying to a lot of schools, so I think it would be ridiculous to list them all. Would 4 or 5 be appropriate and not lying?
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm neither super rich nor super poor, but I selected Yes. I don't see any advantage to not selecting yes.acadec wrote:What's the consensus on whether you want the scholarship committee to consider need? Yes unless you're super rich? No unless you're super poor?
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm sure that would be fine. To be honest, you could probably just list the peer schools.sea15 wrote:Thanks. I'm kind of applying to a lot of schools, so I think it would be ridiculous to list them all. Would 4 or 5 be appropriate and not lying?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login