Agreed! Definitely a long one, and losing 3 hours doesn't help either!honeynutt wrote:I'm going! Not looking forward to the long trip from the West Coast, but excited to finally see the school.AndShe__Was wrote:Anyone going to visit next weekend?
William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle) Forum
- Nammertat

- Posts: 516
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:25 pm
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
- AndShe__Was

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:26 pm
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
Wow that is far, I thought I had a long trip from Northeast PA haha. Since you're traveling so far, are you pretty sure you want to end up at W&M?honeynutt wrote:I'm going! Not looking forward to the long trip from the West Coast, but excited to finally see the school.AndShe__Was wrote:Anyone going to visit next weekend?
-
kellyxo

- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:47 pm
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
I JUST WANT TO HEAR BACK!!!!!!
-
B986

- Posts: 105
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:03 pm
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
My exact thoughts/feelings. If every other school can manage to render a decision in a reasonable amount of time, why can't W&M do the same? It's not like they're a tippity top tier school and can coast on that alone. Get over yourselves and give us a decision, pleeeeeeeeeease! If I sound bitter it's because I AM.kellyxo wrote:I JUST WANT TO HEAR BACK!!!!!!
-
kellyxo

- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:47 pm
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
B986 wrote:My exact thoughts/feelings. If every other school can manage to render a decision in a reasonable amount of time, why can't W&M do the same? It's not like they're a tippity top tier school and can coast on that alone. Get over yourselves and give us a decision, pleeeeeeeeeease! If I sound bitter it's because I AM.kellyxo wrote:I JUST WANT TO HEAR BACK!!!!!!
It's like they don't understand that we out-of-state people need to look for housing, etc.... I need to know if I would be moving to Virginia! Lots of things... and I'm just really impatient. grr.... so annoying.
- hadisious

- Posts: 423
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:05 am
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
It is a bit ridiculous at this point. Granted they say from the get-go that you will hear by April 1. That being said, I think they ought to put more resources into admission if they want to impress prospective students. W&M was a good choice for me but now I've been woo'd by other schools and I don't feel too confident about a school that takes 5 months to get an admission decision out the door. (with zero contact otherwise)B986 wrote:My exact thoughts/feelings. If every other school can manage to render a decision in a reasonable amount of time, why can't W&M do the same? It's not like they're a tippity top tier school and can coast on that alone. Get over yourselves and give us a decision, pleeeeeeeeeease! If I sound bitter it's because I AM.kellyxo wrote:I JUST WANT TO HEAR BACK!!!!!!
-
hokielaw12

- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:13 pm
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
2011 W&M JD Employment Profile
--LinkRemoved--
--LinkRemoved--
-
kellyxo

- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:47 pm
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
hadisious wrote:It is a bit ridiculous at this point. Granted they say from the get-go that you will hear by April 1. That being said, I think they ought to put more resources into admission if they want to impress prospective students. W&M was a good choice for me but now I've been woo'd by other schools and I don't feel too confident about a school that takes 5 months to get an admission decision out the door. (with zero contact otherwise)B986 wrote:My exact thoughts/feelings. If every other school can manage to render a decision in a reasonable amount of time, why can't W&M do the same? It's not like they're a tippity top tier school and can coast on that alone. Get over yourselves and give us a decision, pleeeeeeeeeease! If I sound bitter it's because I AM.kellyxo wrote:I JUST WANT TO HEAR BACK!!!!!!
exactly...
-
tennisking88

- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:15 am
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
What is "JD Advantage"hokielaw12 wrote:2011 W&M JD Employment Profile
--LinkRemoved--
-
tennisking88

- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:15 am
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
It is mildly retarded to judge a school based on its admissions staff. You will have 0 contact with the admissions staff after enrollment.hadisious wrote:It is a bit ridiculous at this point. Granted they say from the get-go that you will hear by April 1. That being said, I think they ought to put more resources into admission if they want to impress prospective students. W&M was a good choice for me but now I've been woo'd by other schools and I don't feel too confident about a school that takes 5 months to get an admission decision out the door. (with zero contact otherwise)B986 wrote:My exact thoughts/feelings. If every other school can manage to render a decision in a reasonable amount of time, why can't W&M do the same? It's not like they're a tippity top tier school and can coast on that alone. Get over yourselves and give us a decision, pleeeeeeeeeease! If I sound bitter it's because I AM.kellyxo wrote:I JUST WANT TO HEAR BACK!!!!!!
-
hokielaw12

- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:13 pm
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
Also known as "JD Preferred"tennisking88 wrote:What is "JD Advantage"hokielaw12 wrote:2011 W&M JD Employment Profile
--LinkRemoved--
- aeiouy

- Posts: 88
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:07 am
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
A job where a JD is a qualifying degree, but not necessary.tennisking88 wrote:What is "JD Advantage"hokielaw12 wrote:2011 W&M JD Employment Profile
--LinkRemoved--
Last edited by aeiouy on Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
B986

- Posts: 105
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:03 pm
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
Um... yikes?hokielaw12 wrote:2011 W&M JD Employment Profile
--LinkRemoved--
-
srfngdd6

- Posts: 282
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 10:08 pm
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
bar passage preferred...i would assumetennisking88 wrote:What is "JD Advantage"hokielaw12 wrote:2011 W&M JD Employment Profile
--LinkRemoved--
-
wskbarrett

- Posts: 73
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 3:08 pm
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
hokielaw12 wrote:2011 W&M JD Employment Profile
--LinkRemoved--
thoughts on this? I'm not especially impressed, although the 20% doing clerkships is pretty cool.
- hadisious

- Posts: 423
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:05 am
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
I'm not judging it based on the admissions staff. But if multiple peer schools are keeping in touch and working hard to get my attendance, why wouldn't I be put-off on some level by W&M?tennisking88 wrote:It is mildly retarded to judge a school based on its admissions staff. You will have 0 contact with the admissions staff after enrollment.hadisious wrote:It is a bit ridiculous at this point. Granted they say from the get-go that you will hear by April 1. That being said, I think they ought to put more resources into admission if they want to impress prospective students. W&M was a good choice for me but now I've been woo'd by other schools and I don't feel too confident about a school that takes 5 months to get an admission decision out the door. (with zero contact otherwise)B986 wrote:My exact thoughts/feelings. If every other school can manage to render a decision in a reasonable amount of time, why can't W&M do the same? It's not like they're a tippity top tier school and can coast on that alone. Get over yourselves and give us a decision, pleeeeeeeeeease! If I sound bitter it's because I AM.kellyxo wrote:I JUST WANT TO HEAR BACK!!!!!!
Last edited by hadisious on Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:16 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
kellyxo

- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:47 pm
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
I'm not judging it based on the admissions staff. But if multiple peer schools are keeping in touch and working hard to get my attendance, why wouldn't I be put-off on some level by W&M?[/quote]
+1
+1
-
tennisking88

- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:15 am
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
Because you should judge schools based on things other than how impatient the admissions staff makes you. Like the employment stats above.hadisious wrote: I'm not judging it based on the admissions staff. But if multiple peer schools are keeping in touch and working hard to get my attendance, why wouldn't I be put-off on some level by W&M?
-
B986

- Posts: 105
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:03 pm
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
Blahhhhh who cares! If people want to judge a school for its admissions staff, colors, facilities, motto, whatever, what difference does it make for anyone else?tennisking88 wrote:Because you should judge schools based on things other than how impatient the admissions staff makes you. Like the employment stats above.hadisious wrote: I'm not judging it based on the admissions staff. But if multiple peer schools are keeping in touch and working hard to get my attendance, why wouldn't I be put-off on some level by W&M?
- hadisious

- Posts: 423
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:05 am
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
Remember the part about PEER schools who have been doing a great job of keeping in touch. Similar employment figures, rankings, etc...tennisking88 wrote:Because you should judge schools based on things other than how impatient the admissions staff makes you. Like the employment stats above.hadisious wrote: I'm not judging it based on the admissions staff. But if multiple peer schools are keeping in touch and working hard to get my attendance, why wouldn't I be put-off on some level by W&M?
W&M admissions has to do something to make themselves noteworthy. That is their job. As far as I'm concerned they are in competition for me, not the other way around.
-
tennisking88

- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:15 am
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
This is actually a fantastic point. Why do I care?B986 wrote:Blahhhhh who cares! If people want to judge a school for its admissions staff, colors, facilities, motto, whatever, what difference does it make for anyone else?tennisking88 wrote:Because you should judge schools based on things other than how impatient the admissions staff makes you. Like the employment stats above.hadisious wrote: I'm not judging it based on the admissions staff. But if multiple peer schools are keeping in touch and working hard to get my attendance, why wouldn't I be put-off on some level by W&M?
-
kellyxo

- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:47 pm
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
tennisking88 wrote:This is actually a fantastic point. Why do I care?B986 wrote:Blahhhhh who cares! If people want to judge a school for its admissions staff, colors, facilities, motto, whatever, what difference does it make for anyone else?tennisking88 wrote:Because you should judge schools based on things other than how impatient the admissions staff makes you. Like the employment stats above.hadisious wrote: I'm not judging it based on the admissions staff. But if multiple peer schools are keeping in touch and working hard to get my attendance, why wouldn't I be put-off on some level by W&M?
well, that's solved
- ap613

- Posts: 66
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:30 am
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
hadisious wrote:It is a bit ridiculous at this point. Granted they say from the get-go that you will hear by April 1. That being said, I think they ought to put more resources into admission if they want to impress prospective students. W&M was a good choice for me but now I've been woo'd by other schools and I don't feel too confident about a school that takes 5 months to get an admission decision out the door. (with zero contact otherwise)B986 wrote:My exact thoughts/feelings. If every other school can manage to render a decision in a reasonable amount of time, why can't W&M do the same? It's not like they're a tippity top tier school and can coast on that alone. Get over yourselves and give us a decision, pleeeeeeeeeease! If I sound bitter it's because I AM.kellyxo wrote:I JUST WANT TO HEAR BACK!!!!!!
If you look through last year's thread this is just what W&M does. They accept people on a rolling basis and then WL just about everyone else mid-March. Last year it was the 15th so it will probably be any day now.
- ap613

- Posts: 66
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:30 am
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
Yeah, that seems like a decent number of unemployed people. Need to see more 2011 numbers from other schools though to find out if its W&M or just the economy.B986 wrote:Um... yikes?hokielaw12 wrote:2011 W&M JD Employment Profile
--LinkRemoved--
- AndShe__Was

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:26 pm
Re: William and Mary c/o 2015 (2011-2012 Cycle)
This is actually one of the reason I like W&M over the peer schools I got accepted to. In my case, since my acceptance to W&M (which was the first one I received), I've gotten at least one e-mail or letter from them pretty much every week explaining some program/employment stats/congratulations/etc. We all want to feel wanted.hadisious wrote:Remember the part about PEER schools who have been doing a great job of keeping in touch. Similar employment figures, rankings, etc...tennisking88 wrote:Because you should judge schools based on things other than how impatient the admissions staff makes you. Like the employment stats above.hadisious wrote: I'm not judging it based on the admissions staff. But if multiple peer schools are keeping in touch and working hard to get my attendance, why wouldn't I be put-off on some level by W&M?
W&M admissions has to do something to make themselves noteworthy. That is their job. As far as I'm concerned they are in competition for me, not the other way around.
I hope you guys all hear back soon with good news! keep us posted