i submitted 10/26 and went complete 11/3. im guessing yours will take longer because of the holidays that were in between.savesthedayajb wrote:Still not complete, submitted 12/22. How long does this usually take?
UCLA? Forum
- summerschooled
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:41 pm
Re: UCLA?
I went complete so long ago that I almost forgot I'd applied -- I've been waiting since October and still haven't heard anything.savesthedayajb wrote:Still not complete, submitted 12/22. How long does this usually take?
- wackjickham
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm
Re: UCLA?
WL'd on 1/5 with what I thought were Auto-Numbers for UCLA. I guess my GPA was a little low for them, and I'm not too worried about it because I dont think I actually would have attended, but it is a little unnerving because I think it might say something about the quality of my softs.
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 12:19 am
Re: UCLA?
got a call yesterday night from the dean, how exciting/weird!
i went complete in early nov if that is helpful info.
i went complete in early nov if that is helpful info.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- GobiasIndustries
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:56 pm
Re: UCLA?
+2tintin wrote:+1summerschooled wrote: I went complete so long ago that I almost forgot I'd applied -- I've been waiting since October and still haven't heard anything.


-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:29 pm
Re: UCLA?
+3.GobiasIndustries wrote:+2tintin wrote:+1summerschooled wrote: I went complete so long ago that I almost forgot I'd applied -- I've been waiting since October and still haven't heard anything.![]()

- Mroberts3
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:10 pm
Re: UCLA?
3.66/167 just got dinged via snail mail today.
I wasn't banking on UCLA, but looking at LSN I kinda thought I would at least get a WL. Oh well, that's what happens when 200,000 people take the LSAT in one year. Also, stupid me for going to an undergrad with no grade inflation...3.9/167 would probably have been an acceptance.
Good luck to everyone else!
I wasn't banking on UCLA, but looking at LSN I kinda thought I would at least get a WL. Oh well, that's what happens when 200,000 people take the LSAT in one year. Also, stupid me for going to an undergrad with no grade inflation...3.9/167 would probably have been an acceptance.
Good luck to everyone else!
- Faesha
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 3:03 pm
Re: UCLA?
I mean this in the kindest possible way... But I really would have thought you'd have gotten at least a waitlist with those numbers. I'm sorry to hear this!Mroberts3 wrote:3.66/167 just got dinged via snail mail today.
I wasn't banking on UCLA, but looking at LSN I kinda thought I would at least get a WL. Oh well, that's what happens when 200,000 people take the LSAT in one year. Also, stupid me for going to an undergrad with no grade inflation...3.9/167 would probably have been an acceptance.
Good luck to everyone else!
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:10 pm
Re: UCLA?
I just got the bad news too. I was hoping for the WL, but I guess it is hypercompetitive this year. 166/3.5Mroberts3 wrote:3.66/167 just got dinged via snail mail today.
I wasn't banking on UCLA, but looking at LSN I kinda thought I would at least get a WL. Oh well, that's what happens when 200,000 people take the LSAT in one year. Also, stupid me for going to an undergrad with no grade inflation...3.9/167 would probably have been an acceptance.
Good luck to everyone else!
- SanBun
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:19 pm
Re: UCLA?
damn, UCLA is super competitive this year. Sorry to hear that, I hope you guys get your other schools.bconly wrote:I just got the bad news too. I was hoping for the WL, but I guess it is hypercompetitive this year. 166/3.5Mroberts3 wrote:3.66/167 just got dinged via snail mail today.
I wasn't banking on UCLA, but looking at LSN I kinda thought I would at least get a WL. Oh well, that's what happens when 200,000 people take the LSAT in one year. Also, stupid me for going to an undergrad with no grade inflation...3.9/167 would probably have been an acceptance.
Good luck to everyone else!
when did you two go complete, if you don't mind me asking?
is it reasonable to assume that as a borderline applicant having gone complete 11/03, the longer I don't hear back the better?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Veritas
- Posts: 2695
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:50 pm
Re: UCLA?
Oli, I didn't receive one either!Oli wrote:BUTTERS!Veritas wrote:I was expecting a ding in my mail box today. Quite relieved it was not there.I'm sad. No news from anywhere and Berk faculty review emails went out (did not get one).

Sometimes, no news is good news (maybe not for berk, but for other schools). Keep your chin up, it's going to work out great.
- Vegas_Rebel
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 11:18 am
Re: UCLA?
That's three of us.Veritas wrote:Oli, I didn't receive one either!Oli wrote:BUTTERS!Veritas wrote:I was expecting a ding in my mail box today. Quite relieved it was not there.I'm sad. No news from anywhere and Berk faculty review emails went out (did not get one).
![]()
Sometimes, no news is good news (maybe not for berk, but for other schools). Keep your chin up, it's going to work out great.
Likely dinged at Mich, no Berk Email, and I'm banking on a UCLA ding given the numbers of some who have already been dinged. Bloodbath day.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- calicocat
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm
Re: UCLA?
I hope so...getting pretty discouraged though...Veritas wrote:Oli, I didn't receive one either!Oli wrote:BUTTERS!Veritas wrote:I was expecting a ding in my mail box today. Quite relieved it was not there.I'm sad. No news from anywhere and Berk faculty review emails went out (did not get one).
![]()
Sometimes, no news is good news (maybe not for berk, but for other schools). Keep your chin up, it's going to work out great.
- calicocat
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm
Re: UCLA?
+1 I kind of know how people felt while waiting for the guillotine.SanBun wrote:yeah same. fuck law school.Vegas_Rebel wrote: That's three of us.
Likely dinged at Mich, no Berk Email, and I'm banking on a UCLA ding given the numbers of some who have already been dinged. Bloodbath day.
- Mroberts3
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:10 pm
Re: UCLA?
I went complete in mid November. I'm not sure whether a lack of info is good or bad. Looking at LSN, there doesn't seem to be a correlations...rejections WL and acceptances have all been rolling in since dec.SanBun wrote:damn, UCLA is super competitive this year. Sorry to hear that, I hope you guys get your other schools.bconly wrote:I just got the bad news too. I was hoping for the WL, but I guess it is hypercompetitive this year. 166/3.5Mroberts3 wrote:3.66/167 just got dinged via snail mail today.
I wasn't banking on UCLA, but looking at LSN I kinda thought I would at least get a WL. Oh well, that's what happens when 200,000 people take the LSAT in one year. Also, stupid me for going to an undergrad with no grade inflation...3.9/167 would probably have been an acceptance.
Good luck to everyone else!
when did you two go complete, if you don't mind me asking?
is it reasonable to assume that as a borderline applicant having gone complete 11/03, the longer I don't hear back the better?
FWIW I'm one of those applicants for whom the stats are a pretty good indicator (not splitter, white male, 1-2 out of UG, good UG, no negative softs but nothing special either)
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: UCLA?
Living there deserves congratulations too. Not everyone gets to go to heaven before they die.hopefulundergrad wrote:He lives in San Deigo.caliborn wrote:Congrats on San Diego!Veritas wrote:complete since 11/3, but no word. I'm in San Diego, so I would have gotten the most recent decisions sent out.
I really wish I was in the adcomms heads!

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login