Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
Anonymous4444

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sorry Lavitz that's rediculous.
-
RBen148

- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:04 am
- Crowing

- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm not. I don't have any particularly noteworthy softs either.applemaroon wrote:Do you mind me asking if you're URM?Crowing wrote:Maybe, but I got in with a 3.46 so a 3.7 sounds pretty great.
-
az21833

- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
so is it true that everybody admitted has to have a interview first? thats gona delay chicagos jan submits BIG TIME
- applemaroon

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Jaqen

- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You're just here to troll applemaroon with that LSAT+GPA, right?RBen148 wrote:In!
But really, gj Ben. Grats!
- applemaroon

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- HawkeyeGirl

- Posts: 459
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Don't worry Apple, obviously UChi will bump up your 3.7 to a 4.2 because of the rigor of your UG....applemaroon wrote:LOL I know, please don't be trolling. My delicate heart can't take it.Jaqen wrote:You're just here to troll applemaroon with that LSAT+GPA, right?RBen148 wrote:In!(I think you've definitely got a chance, applem, and the other two in CCN are less focused on GPA, as mentioned.)
But really, gj Ben. Grats!
- applemaroon

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- banjo

- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Ridiculous. Just wait a couple more days for that VCE and you'll forget about this transparent YPing.Lavitz wrote:Waitlisted.
- moonman157

- Posts: 1040
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 10:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Lavitz is the JamMasterJ of this cycle. Best of luck bud, I don't have to tell you that you're going to have amazing options
- Crowing

- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Lavitz is gonna go to Yale imo so no need to worry about him.
-
shntn

- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1, down to the hundredths place.Crowing wrote:Maybe, but I got in with a 3.46 so a 3.7 sounds pretty great.
-
one_by_one

- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by one_by_one on Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
az21833

- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
this!HawkeyeGirl wrote:Don't worry Apple, obviously UChi will bump up your 3.7 to a 4.2 because of the rigor of your UG....applemaroon wrote:LOL I know, please don't be trolling. My delicate heart can't take it.Jaqen wrote:You're just here to troll applemaroon with that LSAT+GPA, right?RBen148 wrote:In!(I think you've definitely got a chance, applem, and the other two in CCN are less focused on GPA, as mentioned.)
But really, gj Ben. Grats!
-
az21833

- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
so how do scholarships work at uchi? when are all you admitted kids giong to hear? with award package?
- bobr

- Posts: 96
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:42 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Waitlisted and had interview.
Best of luck everyone!
Best of luck everyone!
-
vzapana

- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Does Chicago ever hold?
- Yukos

- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
In today, numbers above both medians but at or below 75ths. I interviewed and it was aite; my Why Chicago answer was very strong though IMO.
But Lavitz's WL is really depressing. I don't understand his cycle at all, dude should've been a first-wave HLS admit.
But Lavitz's WL is really depressing. I don't understand his cycle at all, dude should've been a first-wave HLS admit.
- Lavitz

- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Ok, home now so I can post more.
Congrats to everyone who got in today! Special congrats to Banjo who got his well-deserved redemption.
And thanks to everyone supporting me. I really appreciate it.
What's really funny is that--like with Harvard--it looks like I once again correctly predicted my outcome at the beginning of the thread. From page 3:
Anyway, sorry Reg, looks like Chicago may not have enough room for both of us
No, Noodley, I haven't killed anyone (that I know of).
Special thanks to spicyyoda for the inspirational post. Would like to type up a motivational post here, but the gym is closing soon so I need to get going.
Peace.
Congrats to everyone who got in today! Special congrats to Banjo who got his well-deserved redemption.
And thanks to everyone supporting me. I really appreciate it.
What's really funny is that--like with Harvard--it looks like I once again correctly predicted my outcome at the beginning of the thread. From page 3:
I guess I'm just disappointed because in both cases the interview got my hopes up. Oh well. Guess that's two LOCIs I need to write now.Lavitz wrote:As it is, have a feeling Chicago will be looking to WL/reject me since my GPA is below their median but above Columbia's and NYU's.
Good call. About 20 minutes ago, I was actually thinking of comparing myself to Jam. Unfortunately, I'm not as fond of NYU as he is, so it looks like Columbia is my last hope.moonman157 wrote:Lavitz is the JamMasterJ of this cycle. Best of luck bud, I don't have to tell you that you're going to have amazing options
Anyway, sorry Reg, looks like Chicago may not have enough room for both of us
No, Noodley, I haven't killed anyone (that I know of).
Special thanks to spicyyoda for the inspirational post. Would like to type up a motivational post here, but the gym is closing soon so I need to get going.
Peace.
- Mr. Elshal

- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You should google your name and see if any cult leaders/terrorists come up. They might be confusing you with somebody else who has a terrible internet presenceLavitz wrote:Ok, home now so I can post more.
Congrats to everyone who got in today! Special congrats to Banjo who got his well-deserved redemption.
And thanks to everyone supporting me. I really appreciate it.
What's really funny is that--like with Harvard--it looks like I once again correctly predicted my outcome at the beginning of the thread. From page 3:I guess I'm just disappointed because in both cases the interview got my hopes up. Oh well. Guess that's two LOCIs I need to write now.Lavitz wrote:As it is, have a feeling Chicago will be looking to WL/reject me since my GPA is below their median but above Columbia's and NYU's.
Good call. About 20 minutes ago, I was actually thinking of comparing myself to Jam. Unfortunately, I'm not as fond of NYU as he is, so it looks like Columbia is my last hope.moonman157 wrote:Lavitz is the JamMasterJ of this cycle. Best of luck bud, I don't have to tell you that you're going to have amazing options
Anyway, sorry Reg, looks like Chicago may not have enough room for both of us![]()
No, Noodley, I haven't killed anyone (that I know of).
Special thanks to spicyyoda for the inspirational post. Would like to type up a motivational post here, but the gym is closing soon so I need to get going.
Peace.
-
20141023

- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 3:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- cwid1391

- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So Chicago said that some denies would come out today too. Is the TLS sample size just too small or did they not send them out today?
- Mr. Elshal

- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
TLSers are just so awesome. ITT we get everything except rejectionscwid1391 wrote:So Chicago said that some denies would come out today too. Is the TLS sample size just too small or did they not send them out today?
- rehsalt

- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:32 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Really sorry to see this, Lavitz. This whole process can be truly shitty and a "life-consuming, ego-shattering bugaboo" (that's from Anna Ivey's description of the LSAT).Lavitz wrote: Waitlisted.
BTW I don't think you're anywhere near Jam territory. He didn't get accepted anywhere until May.
But the bottom line: It's Chicago's loss.