dc_diva wrote: I think that if you wrote a compelling diversity statement about being *insert your non-traditional URM of choice* they will take that into account...As in, I had a JS1 in November and was told by everyone that my ethnicity (Hispanic/Latina, but not PR or Mexican American) wouldn't give me a boost but I'm below both 25% so, I'm inclined to think they are absolutely considering me a URM.
DO NOT QUOTE, PLEASE:
This. +1,000,000.
I think there certainly is a boost whether anyone wishes to admit it or not. I've seen people whom I would identify as NON-TRADITIONAL URM identify as non-URM and I feel it is because they're ashamed that it could have boosted them in the admissions process. Frankly that's a damn shame. ..... y'all, I'll take whatever boost I can get. We're talking about our futures here. Ain't no games to be PLAYED. Nothing to be ashamed about, either. A boost is not enough to get you in. Something about your application needs to stand out so no one should be reducing anyone, herself or himself included, to mere race or ethnicity.
Lastly, when people incessantly remind others that they are not URM if they're non-traditional (outside the LSAC parameters of MX or PR) - it sounds so self-serving, to be honest. Y'all either want to convince others that they have no boost to make them feel like they should withdraw or, at least, have no hope; or, you're just bothered, in which case, can't relate. #peace&blessings