Huh?Jaqen wrote:What.Lavitz wrote:Ok everyone, here it comes... Waitlisted.
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- EttaJ
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:41 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- Vincent
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I do not understand. WTF?Lavitz wrote:Ok everyone, here it comes...
.....
..........
..............
Waitlisted.
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
this is creditedspicyyoda17 wrote:I'm convinced that w/ people like Lavitz, all it takes is one sincere LOCI and boom, they can go where they want.Jaqen wrote:What.Lavitz wrote:Ok everyone, here it comes... Waitlisted.
This is YP at its best.
But Lavitz, in all seriousness, we're all pulling for you and hope that ultimately you end up at your #1 choice and you will be all the more happy about it.
- trojandave
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
What?! I'm starting to think Lav has us all on a 3 month-long epic troll. Nothing else makes senseLavitz wrote:Ok everyone, here it comes...
Waitlisted.
- elterrible78
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:09 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
One of the two worst pieces of news I have heard today. I am really, really sorry to hear this.Lavitz wrote:Ok everyone, here it comes...
.....
..........
..............
Waitlisted.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
hey guys, out of the RD admits what % of you interviewed. Same question for WL. Same question for rejections.
thank you all and congratulations (esp. yoda, trombaltana, annonymous, eichenchorn and my other #s twins, you guys are my fam)
thank you all and congratulations (esp. yoda, trombaltana, annonymous, eichenchorn and my other #s twins, you guys are my fam)
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by one_by_one on Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 3:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
also is it just me or do the #s seem a little below UChi's typical cycle? this is purely anecdotal but i think we might be seeing the first of the 2013 slight, SLIGHT bump
- NoodleyOne
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 7:32 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Lavitz, I have to ask...
Have you ever been convicted of manslaughter? I can't think of any other reason.
Have you ever been convicted of manslaughter? I can't think of any other reason.
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
lavitz maybe re-read your p/s or d/s?
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Sat Sep 07, 2013 12:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
<-- exceptionapplemaroon wrote:So.....based on all the acceptance and WL folks' numbers, seems like UChi greatly favors high GPA over LSAT. What do you guys think?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Jaqen
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
They're definitely a GPA-heavy school. For the C/O 2015, the median was 3.9 and the 75th was 3.96.applemaroon wrote:So.....based on all the acceptance and WL folks' numbers, seems like UChi greatly favors high GPA over LSAT. What do you guys think?
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Sat Sep 07, 2013 12:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
on the flip side A LOT of high 160s getting the early nod
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Jaqen wrote:They're definitely a GPA-heavy school. For the C/O 2015, the median was 3.9 and the 75th was 3.96.applemaroon wrote:So.....based on all the acceptance and WL folks' numbers, seems like UChi greatly favors high GPA over LSAT. What do you guys think?


Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Compared to CLS and NYU this is definitely true. It doesn't look like many traditional splitters were admitted today.applemaroon wrote:So.....based on all the acceptance and WL folks' numbers, seems like UChi greatly favors high GPA over LSAT. What do you guys think?
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
maybe so but your chances at hls and cls are tremendous so no reason for concern my fair maidenapplemaroon wrote:Crowing wrote:Compared to CLS and NYU this is definitely true. It doesn't look like many traditional splitters were admitted today.applemaroon wrote:So.....based on all the acceptance and WL folks' numbers, seems like UChi greatly favors high GPA over LSAT. What do you guys think?
Based on today's acceptances, I feel like my chances are slim
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Your numbers look pretty damn good to meapplemaroon wrote:Crowing wrote:Compared to CLS and NYU this is definitely true. It doesn't look like many traditional splitters were admitted today.applemaroon wrote:So.....based on all the acceptance and WL folks' numbers, seems like UChi greatly favors high GPA over LSAT. What do you guys think?
Based on today's acceptances, I feel like my chances are slim
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Maybe, but I got in with a 3.46 so a 3.7 sounds pretty great.
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I got WL with a 3.82 and 168.. but don't have ties to the area, so maybe I need to convince them I would come if accepted via the LOCI etc.Crowing wrote:Maybe, but I got in with a 3.46 so a 3.7 sounds pretty great.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login