you can find me at www.top-law-schools.com! Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
hillz

Silver
Posts: 1050
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 1:41 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by hillz » Sat Jan 17, 2015 6:56 pm

secadc11 wrote:
secadc11 wrote:Once your status changes to "decision made", how long until the email shows up?
To answer my own question, it took me about an hour after my status changed.

In via PT! Above LSAT 75th, below GPA 25th. So excited!!
Congrats!!

User avatar
leslieknope

Silver
Posts: 1114
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:53 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by leslieknope » Sat Jan 17, 2015 7:00 pm

secadc11 wrote:
secadc11 wrote:Once your status changes to "decision made", how long until the email shows up?
To answer my own question, it took me about an hour after my status changed.

In via PT! Above LSAT 75th, below GPA 25th. So excited!!

Congratulations!!

Yeezus

Bronze
Posts: 499
Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 6:37 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by Yeezus » Sat Jan 17, 2015 8:24 pm

secadc11 wrote:
secadc11 wrote:Once your status changes to "decision made", how long until the email shows up?
To answer my own question, it took me about an hour after my status changed.

In via PT! Above LSAT 75th, below GPA 25th. So excited!!
Congrats! Hopefully I'll get the same email tomorrow from Duke.

Yeezus

Bronze
Posts: 499
Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 6:37 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by Yeezus » Sun Jan 18, 2015 4:52 pm

Priority Reserve... Wtf :(

User avatar
Mack.Hambleton

Platinum
Posts: 5414
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by Mack.Hambleton » Sun Jan 18, 2015 4:54 pm

YeezusPiece wrote:Priority Reserve... Wtf :(
Stats?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Yeezus

Bronze
Posts: 499
Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 6:37 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by Yeezus » Sun Jan 18, 2015 4:58 pm

Mack.Hambleton wrote:
YeezusPiece wrote:Priority Reserve... Wtf :(
Stats?
3.7x, 170. I also wrote a Why Duke, so I'm definitely a little surprised. Guess I'll have to write an LOCI since Duke is one of my top choices.

secadc11

Silver
Posts: 601
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:13 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by secadc11 » Sun Jan 18, 2015 5:00 pm

YeezusPiece wrote:
Mack.Hambleton wrote:
YeezusPiece wrote:Priority Reserve... Wtf :(
Stats?
3.7x, 170. I also wrote a Why Duke, so I'm definitely a little surprised. Guess I'll have to write an LOCI since Duke is one of my top choices.
Damn Yeezus sorry to hear. I bet with a LOCI and your numbers you have a great shot of coming off the waitlist.

User avatar
leslieknope

Silver
Posts: 1114
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:53 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by leslieknope » Sun Jan 18, 2015 5:02 pm

In via PT! LSAT just below median, GPA>75th, wrote Why Duke. First acceptance of the cycle! I'm so relieved I'm shaking.

User avatar
leslieknope

Silver
Posts: 1114
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:53 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by leslieknope » Sun Jan 18, 2015 5:18 pm

YeezusPiece wrote:Priority Reserve... Wtf :(
Sorry to hear that man :/ I'm sure with a LOCI you'll hear some very good things coming soon!

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


secadc11

Silver
Posts: 601
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:13 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by secadc11 » Sun Jan 18, 2015 5:32 pm

leslieknope wrote:In via PT! LSAT just below median, GPA>75th, wrote Why Duke. First acceptance of the cycle! I'm so relieved I'm shaking.
Congrats!

janwlee

New
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:03 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by janwlee » Sun Jan 18, 2015 6:21 pm

provisionally accepted via PT. right on day 10!

Redynsje

New
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 5:18 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by Redynsje » Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:27 am

On word on how long it takes to hear back for us non PT applicants? Application complete as of 12/1/14. File under review as of 1/5/15.

User avatar
Tr3

Silver
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:25 am

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by Tr3 » Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:32 am

Redynsje wrote:On word on how long it takes to hear back for us non PT applicants? Application complete as of 12/1/14. File under review as of 1/5/15.
I'm not actually sure, but I took a look at last year's thread and it looks like some non-PT people started going UR2 around 1/22 (IIRC) and decisions in early Feb. I don't remember exact dates.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Redynsje

New
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 5:18 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by Redynsje » Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:48 am

Also, this may be a ridiculous question, but do you know why Duke has the PT option if it is not binding? If they can zip through applications in ten days or less, why would they not do this with all applications?

User avatar
Clemenceau

Silver
Posts: 940
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:33 am

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by Clemenceau » Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:55 am

Redynsje wrote:Also, this may be a ridiculous question, but do you know why Duke has the PT option if it is not binding? If they can zip through applications in ten days or less, why would they not do this with all applications?
I think it's a marketing strategy, more or less. I can't really explain the psychology but it's definitely aimed at increasing matriculation for high-scoring applicants, hence why they don't do it for everyone.

Also, tls makes it seem like 90% of duke applicants are PT. Not the case.

User avatar
pylon

Silver
Posts: 929
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:58 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by pylon » Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:56 am

Redynsje wrote:Also, this may be a ridiculous question, but do you know why Duke has the PT option if it is not binding? If they can zip through applications in ten days or less, why would they not do this with all applications?
This is just a guess, but I would imagine that a lot of PT admits are ones who Duke is at the risk of losing to higher ranked schools (hurting their yield). So PT for those applicants makes sense. And then they do a regular cycle for all applicants for the same reasons other schools do it - sense of the applicant pool, figuring out medians, etc.

nickhalden

Bronze
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by nickhalden » Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:57 am

Redynsje wrote:Also, this may be a ridiculous question, but do you know why Duke has the PT option if it is not binding? If they can zip through applications in ten days or less, why would they not do this with all applications?
They don't do it with all applicants because it's (probably) burdensome on the admissions staff/process to make a quality decision in such a timely fashion. We were speculating earlier ITT that the PT program increased matriculation and they invited potential applicants that...well, we don't know their reasoning.

Edit: scooped
Clemenceau wrote:I think it's a marketing strategy, more or less. I can't really explain the psychology but it's definitely aimed at increasing matriculation for high-scoring applicants, hence why they don't do it for everyone.
pylon wrote:This is just a guess, but I would imagine that a lot of PT admits are ones who Duke is at the risk of losing to higher ranked schools (hurting their yield). So PT for those applicants makes sense. And then they do a regular cycle for all applicants for the same reasons other schools do it - sense of the applicant pool, figuring out medians, etc.
This isn't entirely true. I'm above both 75ths, didn't receive a PT invite, and was turned when I solicited one. We've also seen people get PT that are at and below medians. There's a more complex rationale at play, at least a more complex formula of LSAT/GPA.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Redynsje

New
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 5:18 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by Redynsje » Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:01 pm

That makes sense. I am >75% on both GPA and LSAT. For some unknown reason, I overlooked the PT option. Now Duke is really one of my top choices and I am in agony sitting around waiting for their decision. I am really ready to move on with my life and start making some decisions!

nickhalden

Bronze
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by nickhalden » Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:04 pm

Redynsje wrote:That makes sense. I am >75% on both GPA and LSAT. For some unknown reason, I overlooked the PT option. Now Duke is really one of my top choices and I am in agony sitting around waiting for their decision. I am really ready to move on with my life and start making some decisions!
Well, they overlooked you for PT. They're given out by invitation and I think only KissMyAxe has successfully solicited a PT (and he had unique circumstances). It may be that they view candidates above 75ths as too much of a reach, but candidates like xylocarp received PT invites (albeit early in the cycle). So I don't know. It's definitely an interesting question.

Scaliafan3421

Bronze
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:51 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by Scaliafan3421 » Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:21 pm

deleted
Last edited by Scaliafan3421 on Thu May 04, 2017 12:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

nickhalden

Bronze
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by nickhalden » Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:34 pm

tincan678 wrote:At an admissions event held by Duke and a few other law schools, Dean Hoye talked about how they view applicants in context of their undergraduate university (so a 166 LSAT is more impressive if the student comes from a school that has an average LSAT of 150, as opposed to a 168 from Harvard).
That's really interesting! At my undergraduate institution, the median LSAT is a 154 and 6% of alumni scored above 167.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


secadc11

Silver
Posts: 601
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:13 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by secadc11 » Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:35 pm

tincan678 wrote:At an admissions event held by Duke and a few other law schools, Dean Hoye talked about how they view applicants in context of their undergraduate university (so a 166 LSAT is more impressive if the student comes from a school that has an average LSAT of 150, as opposed to a 168 from Harvard).

My guess is that Duke runs some sort of algorithm to send PT invites to applicants that fill a particular percentile within each university.

Does anyone know if Duke increased the number of PT invites sent out this year as compared to last year? I'd be surprised if it actually increased their yield because this system is probably the most blatant example of non-holistic admissions policies I've seen from any school.
Obviously this is just one example, but I did not consider myself a shoe-in for Duke at all and was offered PT, and admitted. I am a splitter with a GPA well below their 25th... so I think either there is some holistic consideration or, as someone mentioned earlier, some sort of complex calculation occurring.

Edit: I should add my undergrad has a high average LSAT.

nickhalden

Bronze
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by nickhalden » Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:38 pm

secadc11 wrote:Obviously this is just one example, but I did not consider myself a shoe-in for Duke at all and was offered PT, and admitted. I am a splitter with a GPA well below their 25th... so I think either there is some holistic consideration or, as someone mentioned earlier, some sort of complex calculation occurring.
There can't be a holistic consideration, unless you consider what tincan678 referenced holistic. Duke only has access to your LSAT/GPA when they extend a PT invite, excepting solitications like KissMyAxe made where he provided additional information.

secadc11

Silver
Posts: 601
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:13 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by secadc11 » Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:39 pm

nickhalden wrote:
secadc11 wrote:Obviously this is just one example, but I did not consider myself a shoe-in for Duke at all and was offered PT, and admitted. I am a splitter with a GPA well below their 25th... so I think either there is some holistic consideration or, as someone mentioned earlier, some sort of complex calculation occurring.
There can't be a holistic consideration, unless you consider what tincan678 referenced holistic. Duke only has access to your LSAT/GPA when they extend a PT invite, excepting solitications like KissMyAxe made where he provided additional information.
Looks like it's a calculation then. :)

User avatar
hillz

Silver
Posts: 1050
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 1:41 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by hillz » Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:43 pm

nickhalden wrote:
tincan678 wrote:At an admissions event held by Duke and a few other law schools, Dean Hoye talked about how they view applicants in context of their undergraduate university (so a 166 LSAT is more impressive if the student comes from a school that has an average LSAT of 150, as opposed to a 168 from Harvard).
That's really interesting! At my undergraduate institution, the median LSAT is a 154 and 6% of alumni scored above 167.
Hmm, there could be something to that. I got offered PT early in the fall before a retake when I had a mid 160s score. The median LSAT at my undergrad is a 152.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”