I think that there's a good shot that some (hopefully all!) Tuesday interviewees will get JS2s early next week. Two years ago--that was the case, and JS said somewhere that this cycle would, in timing, resemble two years ago.ScratchableItch wrote: I really hope that those of us interviewed Tuesday hear back before these next two weeks of interviews, but realistically I agree that it probably won't be till the end of December...
Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- yarsten
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:28 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So I was planning on using my headset (earbuds with mic) for better sound quality on both sides (and since they recommended an external microphone)- do you think this is unprofessional? Would it be better to just use built in equipment?ScratchableItch wrote:I probably wouldn't do this, as you want your interview to be as professional as possible. Being over Skype I wanted to make especially sure that it was as normal as possible since talking over video is awkward enough. But that's just my opinion!zdamico wrote:What have been done about wearing headphones when skype interviewing? I prefer to, it helps me hear them better, but I'm not sure what' kosher.
I really hope that those of us interviewed Tuesday hear back before these next two weeks of interviews, but realistically I agree that it probably won't be till the end of December...spicyyoda17 wrote:Well they most likely won't be doing JS2s the week of 12/10 when they are doing a bunch of interviews. It makes more sense that they would wait and do the JS2s after the 2 straight weeks of interviewing.
Also, 12/17 fits in line with last year's timeline in terms of December admits.
- ScratchableItch
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 1:10 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I did just fine in my interview without an external microphone, and without headphones. But I do have a newer computer, and I tested it out beforehand to make sure that would work.yarsten wrote: So I was planning on using my headset (earbuds with mic) for better sound quality on both sides (and since they recommended an external microphone)- do you think this is unprofessional? Would it be better to just use built in equipment?
Maybe it's not quite unprofessional, and this is just my opinion, but I just think it would look better without headphones. Maybe I'm wrong though and it won't matter. The most important thing to worry about is just being confident and personable in your interview, whatever that takes for you individually.
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Small JS0 rant here, but this sucks. The (1) that pops up next to "Inbox" has never meant so much to me. I'm disappointed 20+ times a day.
End rant. Sorry it wasn't a poem.
End rant. Sorry it wasn't a poem.
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1 brother
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:33 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
me too Helix me too....
does it seem to you that they still haven't gone below 174 for non-URMs/non-trad?
Maybe we're just at the cusp of JS1's? (I'm low 170s - but hoepfully the rest of my app makes up for it!)
I mean how long can they keep getting people above the median LSAT?
The whole idea of the median is that 50% of people are below it...
does it seem to you that they still haven't gone below 174 for non-URMs/non-trad?
Maybe we're just at the cusp of JS1's? (I'm low 170s - but hoepfully the rest of my app makes up for it!)
I mean how long can they keep getting people above the median LSAT?
The whole idea of the median is that 50% of people are below it...
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hopefully we get those JS1 emails soon... I'm esp rooting for you, helix, since we're practically numbers twins but also because your avatar is fantastichelix23 wrote:Small JS0 rant here, but this sucks. The (1) that pops up next to "Inbox" has never meant so much to me. I'm disappointed 20+ times a day.
End rant. Sorry it wasn't a poem.
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It is foolish to get discouraged this early. It's still November. A lot of us are probably in for the long haul. Just gotta keep things in perspective.Cherries2013 wrote:me too Helix me too....
does it seem to you that they still haven't gone below 174 for non-URMs/non-trad?
Maybe we're just at the cusp of JS1's? (I'm low 170s - but hoepfully the rest of my app makes up for it!)
I mean how long can they keep getting people above the median LSAT?
The whole idea of the median is that 50% of people are below it...
It's hard to tell how long they can get people with at or above median. I am sure if they start having to dip below LSAT median they'll start grabbing above median GPAs to make up for the -1 or -2 to the LSAT. We'll just have to wait to see what happens.
Kinda sketchy for me being below both lol.
haha thanks. best of luck to you too.one_by_one wrote:Hopefully we get those JS1 emails soon... I'm esp rooting for you, helix, since we're practically numbers twins but also because your avatar is fantastic
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2011 11:06 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Got a JS1 invite today. Complete via status checker on Monday (11/26), complete e-mail today at 7:30 am (PST), JS1 e-mail at 10:30 am. Pretty excited! Numbers are 174/4.0+. Good luck to everyone waiting!
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Gratz!ns2675 wrote:Got a JS1 invite today. Complete via status checker on Monday (11/26), complete e-mail today at 7:30 am (PST), JS1 e-mail at 10:30 am. Pretty excited! Numbers are 174/4.0+. Good luck to everyone waiting!
After looking at your LSN:
I wonder if the proper statistical entry to look at is Date application sent/received --> JS1 or Date application complete --> JS1
- efresh88
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:19 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
What are people's thoughts on the fact that the interview process has changed this year from interviews lasting only 5ish minutes to now close to 15 and the fact that they say they are inviting more people to interview?
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 2:40 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So application complete 11/26, email today - No JS1, though. Should I be concerned that I didn't make the cut for today, or can I reasonably still be offered one? Male non-URM; LSAT 177 / GPA 3.89.
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
When did you submit?Wittgensteinian wrote:So application complete 11/26, email today - No JS1, though. Should I be concerned that I didn't make the cut for today, or can I reasonably still be offered one? Male non-URM; LSAT 177 / GPA 3.89.
So far everyone I've seen with a JS1 a few days (1-3?) after their app went complete sent it in at the beginning of November
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Eichörnchen
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:51 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I came on here to ask if I should give up hope because I submitted early Oct and haven't heard anything. Thanks for cheering me up.helix23 wrote:It is foolish to get discouraged this early. It's still November. A lot of us are probably in for the long haul. Just gotta keep things in perspective.Cherries2013 wrote:me too Helix me too....
does it seem to you that they still haven't gone below 174 for non-URMs/non-trad?
Maybe we're just at the cusp of JS1's? (I'm low 170s - but hoepfully the rest of my app makes up for it!)
I mean how long can they keep getting people above the median LSAT?
The whole idea of the median is that 50% of people are below it...
It's hard to tell how long they can get people with at or above median. I am sure if they start having to dip below LSAT median they'll start grabbing above median GPAs to make up for the -1 or -2 to the LSAT. We'll just have to wait to see what happens.
Kinda sketchy for me being below both lol.
haha thanks. best of luck to you too.one_by_one wrote:Hopefully we get those JS1 emails soon... I'm esp rooting for you, helix, since we're practically numbers twins but also because your avatar is fantastic

Though I know that I have no hope anyways
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 2:40 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Submitted on the 16th. Kind of freaking out, only b/c I assumed I was at least gonna make the JS1 cut; not entirely sure how the system works; if you're not invited when your chronologically similar group is, does that mean you've been held/rejected? Or are they less predictable than that?sinfiery wrote:When did you submit?Wittgensteinian wrote:So application complete 11/26, email today - No JS1, though. Should I be concerned that I didn't make the cut for today, or can I reasonably still be offered one? Male non-URM; LSAT 177 / GPA 3.89.
So far everyone I've seen with a JS1 a few days (1-3?) after their app went complete sent it in at the beginning of November
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I submitted the 16th too. Status changed the 28th, complete today via email.Wittgensteinian wrote:Submitted on the 16th. Kind of freaking out, only b/c I assumed I was at least gonna make the JS1 cut; not entirely sure how the system works; if you're not invited when your chronologically similar group is, does that mean you've been held/rejected? Or are they less predictable than that?sinfiery wrote:When did you submit?Wittgensteinian wrote:So application complete 11/26, email today - No JS1, though. Should I be concerned that I didn't make the cut for today, or can I reasonably still be offered one? Male non-URM; LSAT 177 / GPA 3.89.
So far everyone I've seen with a JS1 a few days (1-3?) after their app went complete sent it in at the beginning of November
No one I know of within our submission date has gotten a JS1 yet. We are next on the chopping block, but our time has not yet come.

-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 2:40 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks, I was definitely freaking the eff out a little bit. Best of luck!sinfiery wrote:I submitted the 16th too. Status changed the 28th, complete today via email.Wittgensteinian wrote:Submitted on the 16th. Kind of freaking out, only b/c I assumed I was at least gonna make the JS1 cut; not entirely sure how the system works; if you're not invited when your chronologically similar group is, does that mean you've been held/rejected? Or are they less predictable than that?sinfiery wrote:When did you submit?Wittgensteinian wrote:So application complete 11/26, email today - No JS1, though. Should I be concerned that I didn't make the cut for today, or can I reasonably still be offered one? Male non-URM; LSAT 177 / GPA 3.89.
So far everyone I've seen with a JS1 a few days (1-3?) after their app went complete sent it in at the beginning of November
No one I know of within our submission date has gotten a JS1 yet. We are next on the chopping block, but our time has not yet come.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
likewiseWittgensteinian wrote: Best of luck!
-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
submitted on the 16th too. Haven't even been "complete" yet. I'm getting a little anxious.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:52 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
JS1 at 1:47 today.
Complete 11/19
174/4.1/non-URM
Complete 11/19
174/4.1/non-URM
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congrats everyone who got JS1s today, and good luck in your interviews!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Cicero76
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:41 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I submitted on the 12th (complete 11/20) and haven't gotten a JS1 yet either, so we can be holdouts together.Wittgensteinian wrote:Submitted on the 16th. Kind of freaking out, only b/c I assumed I was at least gonna make the JS1 cut; not entirely sure how the system works; if you're not invited when your chronologically similar group is, does that mean you've been held/rejected? Or are they less predictable than that?sinfiery wrote:When did you submit?Wittgensteinian wrote:So application complete 11/26, email today - No JS1, though. Should I be concerned that I didn't make the cut for today, or can I reasonably still be offered one? Male non-URM; LSAT 177 / GPA 3.89.
So far everyone I've seen with a JS1 a few days (1-3?) after their app went complete sent it in at the beginning of November
- digifly
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:28 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I submitted the 9th, went complete the 18th, and received the "complete" email today. Is it safe to assume that if I were lucky enough to nab a JS1, it would have to come within the next few workdays?
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No. A bunch of people who got JS1s these past few days submitted back in September and went complete on 10/10. They were then passed over in the first three batches of JS1s, even while people with later complete dates received invites. It's just that there are too many good applicants to be able to invite all of them as their apps go complete.digifly wrote:I submitted the 9th, went complete the 18th, and received the "complete" email today. Is it safe to assume that if I were lucky enough to nab a JS1, it would have to come within the next few workdays?
Be patient, and if your app is competitive, your time will come.
- digifly
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:28 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Will do! I'm not too on-edge about it, just wanted to get a general idea of the timeline. I appreciate the help, Lavitz.Lavitz wrote:No. A bunch of people who got JS1s these past few days submitted back in September and went complete on 10/10. They were then passed over in the first three batches of JS1s, even while people with later complete dates received invites. It's just that there are too many good applicants to be able to invite all of them as their apps go complete.digifly wrote:I submitted the 9th, went complete the 18th, and received the "complete" email today. Is it safe to assume that if I were lucky enough to nab a JS1, it would have to come within the next few workdays?
Be patient, and if your app is competitive, your time will come.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login