Don't feel sorry, I was going to withdraw from them anyway now that I have something in the T10 lined up. Hope I cleared a spot on the WL for somebody who really wants it.Veritas wrote:sry to hear helm. You wouldn't have liked it out here, anyway.Helmholtz wrote:Veritas wrote:Helmholtz wrote:I haz a waitlist
UCLA haz a withdrawhow did you find out?
The title was "UCLA Law Decision" and the message went something like, "While we're not offering you a spot at this time, you are a very strong candidate who we bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit, etc."
UCLA? Forum
- Helmholtz

- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: UCLA?
- calicocat

- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm
Re: UCLA?
Where did you get in t10 Helm?Helmholtz wrote:Don't feel sorry, I was going to withdraw from them anyway now that I have something in the T10 lined up. Hope I cleared a spot on the WL for somebody who really wants it.Veritas wrote:sry to hear helm. You wouldn't have liked it out here, anyway.Helmholtz wrote:Veritas wrote:how did you find out?
The title was "UCLA Law Decision" and the message went something like, "While we're not offering you a spot at this time, you are a very strong candidate who we bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit, etc."
-
savesthedayajb

- Posts: 528
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:21 pm
Re: UCLA?
I hope I even make the wait list.
- Hopefullawstudent

- Posts: 427
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:35 pm
Re: UCLA?
Hearing that Helm has been WL at UCLA made me reach an interesting realization: A good LSAT is a double edged sword. It may get you rejected or waitlisted at as many - if not more - schools than it gets you into. Obviously, it's not necessarily bad to be wielding this sword, but just saying.
- Veritas

- Posts: 2695
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:50 pm
Re: UCLA?
zOMG me too, I just sent my LOCI after being deferred from ED to RDOli wrote:Better than the real TTT Harvard.Veritas wrote:Congrats on Chicago, better than TTT Michigan.Helmholtz wrote:theHarvardof the MidwestOli wrote: Where did you get in t10 Helm?
I want Michigan so bad
- Helmholtz

- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: UCLA?
Yeah, I think it was specifically mentioned in the WL e-mail that some people won't get off until the first day of classes or so. No thankayoo.msch0i wrote:I was reading the UCLA waitlist thread from last year...and some people didn't even get a response up until late August. Then the thread died. So did my heart.UCLA Waitlist </3
- lifeaway1985

- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:25 am
Re: UCLA?
I got my rejection from Early Decision from UCLA this morning.
-
imisscollege

- Posts: 438
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:21 pm
Re: UCLA?
so what about those of us who have been RD and nothing since October? are we optimistic or not
- parker09

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:15 am
Re: UCLA?
Unsure about my optimism/pessimism ratio, but Really Pissed About Not Hearing Back Yet. Not that I'm feeling entitled to a quick decision, but it's certainly frustrating when other people with or below my numbers AND who submitted later have already gotten a decision. I didn't even want them that badly until it became apparent that they're not dying to have meSlansky wrote:I'm not!imisscollege wrote:so what about those of us who have been RD and nothing since October? are we optimistic or not
SRSLY, UCLA. COME ONNNNN!
- Hopefullawstudent

- Posts: 427
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:35 pm
Re: UCLA?
The way an application is put together can communicate such sentiments. Just saying.parker09 wrote:Unsure about my optimism/pessimism ratio, but Really Pissed About Not Hearing Back Yet. Not that I'm feeling entitled to a quick decision, but it's certainly frustrating when other people with or below my numbers AND who submitted later have already gotten a decision. I didn't even want them that badly until it became apparent that they're not dying to have meSlansky wrote:I'm not!imisscollege wrote:so what about those of us who have been RD and nothing since October? are we optimistic or not![]()
SRSLY, UCLA. COME ONNNNN!
- parker09

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:15 am
Re: UCLA?
Oh, you mean when I ended my PS with "And that's why I feel mediocre about UCLA, which is not at the top of my list," it could have been taken badly by the adcom? Well, crap.Hopefullawstudent wrote:
The way an application is put together can communicate such sentiments. Just saying.
- 5ky

- Posts: 10835
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:10 pm
Re: UCLA?
Meh, I submitted in late October and have numbers above both 75ths (but not too high!) and haven't heard a peep. LSN's in profile if you want to check it out for a little hope.imisscollege wrote:so what about those of us who have been RD and nothing since October? are we optimistic or not