JD2008, I am guessing that the creators are film students and not current SMU law students. Any word as to how this has gone over with the staff? All in all, it was very well done. It almost has a "watching the Office" vibe to it.
Anybody heard back from SMU? Forum
- chadwick218
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 4:47 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
Hi everyone,
I graduated a year ago with a 2.5 GPA from a top 40 school. I know my chances are slim to none to get into a decent school unless I pull off a killer LSAT score. I havent taken the LSATs yet, but ideally, I would like to go to SMU. There, I think I may stand a chance and still enjoy a well-rounded education and graduate with some job prospects.
Can anybody give me a range that i have to hit to expect to be considered a competitive candidate at SMU?
Also, if I do a post-bacc to boost up my gpa, will this help me if I get good grades? Thank you for your help. I really do love and enjoy this forum - everyone is always so supportive but honest.
I graduated a year ago with a 2.5 GPA from a top 40 school. I know my chances are slim to none to get into a decent school unless I pull off a killer LSAT score. I havent taken the LSATs yet, but ideally, I would like to go to SMU. There, I think I may stand a chance and still enjoy a well-rounded education and graduate with some job prospects.
Can anybody give me a range that i have to hit to expect to be considered a competitive candidate at SMU?
Also, if I do a post-bacc to boost up my gpa, will this help me if I get good grades? Thank you for your help. I really do love and enjoy this forum - everyone is always so supportive but honest.
- BigAristotle
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
Graduate work or classes taken after you've gotten a Bachelors won't affect the LSAC GPA. You are stuck with the 2.5.InnoSource wrote:Hi everyone,
I graduated a year ago with a 2.5 GPA from a top 40 school. I know my chances are slim to none to get into a decent school unless I pull off a killer LSAT score. I havent taken the LSATs yet, but ideally, I would like to go to SMU. There, I think I may stand a chance and still enjoy a well-rounded education and graduate with some job prospects.
Can anybody give me a range that i have to hit to expect to be considered a competitive candidate at SMU?
Also, if I do a post-bacc to boost up my gpa, will this help me if I get good grades? Thank you for your help. I really do love and enjoy this forum - everyone is always so supportive but honest.
- penni_rose
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 5:17 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
For whoever it was that asked, my status checker changed the day I was admitted to SMU. Also, if it means anything to any of you my index thing was 3.5 and I got in with a scholarship. I'm not attending, but I thought I still might be of help.
- BigAristotle
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
3.1 Index here, by the way.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:43 am
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
Thanks. There seems to be a big difference between 3.5 and 3.1.
If you have a 2.5 GPA you better nail the LSAT. My guess would be that you need in the 170's.
If you have a 2.5 GPA you better nail the LSAT. My guess would be that you need in the 170's.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 4:54 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
Well, if there are extenuating circumstances, perhaps they could be used to augment your GPA.InnoSource wrote:Hi everyone,
I graduated a year ago with a 2.5 GPA from a top 40 school. I know my chances are slim to none to get into a decent school unless I pull off a killer LSAT score. I havent taken the LSATs yet, but ideally, I would like to go to SMU. There, I think I may stand a chance and still enjoy a well-rounded education and graduate with some job prospects.
Can anybody give me a range that i have to hit to expect to be considered a competitive candidate at SMU?
Also, if I do a post-bacc to boost up my gpa, will this help me if I get good grades? Thank you for your help. I really do love and enjoy this forum - everyone is always so supportive but honest.
- BigAristotle
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
Penni is a 167, 4.0; which is auto-admit at SMU, so her 3.5 is substantially more impressive. Looking over LSN, you'll need a 169-170ish to reach a 3.0 index score (roughly the minimum you'll need, for FT at least), and many of those low GPA, High LSAT acceptances were URMs/Non Trads.smubound wrote:Thanks. There seems to be a big difference between 3.5 and 3.1.
If you have a 2.5 GPA you better nail the LSAT. My guess would be that you need in the 170's.
Part time would have better odds, of course.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 4:54 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
This may seem like a silly question, but what is an "index score" and where do you find information regarding it?BigAristotle wrote:Penni is a 167, 4.0; which is auto-admit at SMU, so her 3.5 is substantially more impressive. Looking over LSN, you'll need a 169-170ish to reach a 3.0 index score (roughly the minimum you'll need, for FT at least), and many of those low GPA, High LSAT acceptances were URMs/Non Trads.smubound wrote:Thanks. There seems to be a big difference between 3.5 and 3.1.
If you have a 2.5 GPA you better nail the LSAT. My guess would be that you need in the 170's.
Part time would have better odds, of course.
- BigAristotle
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
Index Score is a school by school calculation of your GPA(multiplied by a constant) + LSAT Score(multiplied by a constant). There's a document on LSAC that shows each schools formula (that uses it). It is easier to find it on Lawschoolnumbers.com. It doesn't show up on the School's Applicant page, you have to go to each applicant's profile, and it will show their Index Score for each school.Machiavellian wrote:This may seem like a silly question, but what is an "index score" and where do you find information regarding it?BigAristotle wrote:Penni is a 167, 4.0; which is auto-admit at SMU, so her 3.5 is substantially more impressive. Looking over LSN, you'll need a 169-170ish to reach a 3.0 index score (roughly the minimum you'll need, for FT at least), and many of those low GPA, High LSAT acceptances were URMs/Non Trads.smubound wrote:Thanks. There seems to be a big difference between 3.5 and 3.1.
If you have a 2.5 GPA you better nail the LSAT. My guess would be that you need in the 170's.
Part time would have better odds, of course.
- JD2008
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:31 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
The staff is probably laughing at the video. Relative to past Follies, this video is much better (other than "Brokeback Basement" of course). All the folks in the video are law school students and Mukhul is actually the President of the SBA. The guy in the tie at the very end of the video is Dean Camp (who is the Dean of Student Affairs). If you are an actual law student, it is much funnier as you will "get" the inside jokes and the jabs at particular people in the law school.chadwick218 wrote:JD2008, I am guessing that the creators are film students and not current SMU law students. Any word as to how this has gone over with the staff? All in all, it was very well done. It almost has a "watching the Office" vibe to it.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 4:54 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
Thank you, I am going to go and try to figure out my index score... lol.BigAristotle wrote:Index Score is a school by school calculation of your GPA(multiplied by a constant) + LSAT Score(multiplied by a constant). There's a document on LSAC that shows each schools formula (that uses it). It is easier to find it on Lawschoolnumbers.com. It doesn't show up on the School's Applicant page, you have to go to each applicant's profile, and it will show their Index Score for each school.Machiavellian wrote:This may seem like a silly question, but what is an "index score" and where do you find information regarding it?BigAristotle wrote:Penni is a 167, 4.0; which is auto-admit at SMU, so her 3.5 is substantially more impressive. Looking over LSN, you'll need a 169-170ish to reach a 3.0 index score (roughly the minimum you'll need, for FT at least), and many of those low GPA, High LSAT acceptances were URMs/Non Trads.smubound wrote:Thanks. There seems to be a big difference between 3.5 and 3.1.
If you have a 2.5 GPA you better nail the LSAT. My guess would be that you need in the 170's.
Part time would have better odds, of course.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 4:54 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
That is pretty funny... even if you do not go there... yet.. lol.JD2008 wrote:The staff is probably laughing at the video. Relative to past Follies, this video is much better (other than "Brokeback Basement" of course). All the folks in the video are law school students and Mukhul is actually the President of the SBA. The guy in the tie at the very end of the video is Dean Camp (who is the Dean of Student Affairs). If you are an actual law student, it is much funnier as you will "get" the inside jokes and the jabs at particular people in the law school.chadwick218 wrote:JD2008, I am guessing that the creators are film students and not current SMU law students. Any word as to how this has gone over with the staff? All in all, it was very well done. It almost has a "watching the Office" vibe to it.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 11:10 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
Soo... whats a 3 index score mean?
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 10:38 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
just saw this stuff about index scores. don't know if it is helpful to anyone, but my index was 3.4 and i ended up with a scholarship.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 4:54 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
I am not sure how to read an index score either... can anyone explain?paraducks wrote:just saw this stuff about index scores. don't know if it is helpful to anyone, but my index was 3.4 and i ended up with a scholarship.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:43 am
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
If you want to know what your index is for each school, go to your applications at LSAC and you will see each one. Each school is different and some schools don't have one. I am a 3.1 at SMU and I have a 160/3.5. Other examples are 170/3.69 - 3.5 and 161/3.0 - 2.9.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:19 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
I am not too sure if you guys should be relying on the "index scores" as a chief indicator in how your application will fare in the admissions process at SMU: LSN says I'm a 3.0 index (165/3.08) but I got accepted with scholarship, and I'm a non-URM. (I did send my application in pretty darn early so maybe that was a positive effect for me.)pammons wrote:Soo... whats a 3 index score mean?
This was funny! It also scares me...just a little bit...
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:43 am
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
I agree with dt15. I also think that SMU likes the higher LSAT score.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:33 am
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
If that was the case, why haven't I been accepted with my 170?smubound wrote:I agree with dt15. I also think that SMU likes the higher LSAT score.
- BigAristotle
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
TC has self admitted 'unusual aspects about his application', as do I with a very strange Criminal Addendum. I don't think you should look at our stats (166, 3.2 strong softs 4 yrs WE and 170/3.18) as indications. We're outliersbetasteve wrote:No idea on that one. You shoulda been pretty auto-admit.tcwhat wrote:If that was the case, why haven't I been accepted with my 170?smubound wrote:I agree with dt15. I also think that SMU likes the higher LSAT score.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:48 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
You will be don't stress that. Just call and talk to them and show them you're really interested. They might be YP'ingbetasteve wrote:No idea on that one. You shoulda been pretty auto-admit.tcwhat wrote:If that was the case, why haven't I been accepted with my 170?smubound wrote:I agree with dt15. I also think that SMU likes the higher LSAT score.
- BigAristotle
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
Just watched the 'promo video', hilarious. Reminds me a lot of my first UG school.
- JD2008
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:31 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
tcwhat,tcwhat wrote:If that was the case, why haven't I been accepted with my 170?smubound wrote:I agree with dt15. I also think that SMU likes the higher LSAT score.
Do you actually want to go to SMU? It looks like you have been accepted to similar schools (Tulane) and have some decent waitlist schools.
- soccerchick47
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 1:35 pm
Re: Anybody heard back from SMU?
3pm (central time) on Thursday....getting so close, and updates from anyone? I agree that tomorrow will probably be the big boom day for any acceptances~
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login