Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
WL via email
- banjo
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
IN!!!! And btw I interviewed for this one, so I guess I'm not an asparagus like Regulus. Also, unless CLS matches/exceeds Chicago's COA, my cycle is over!
- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Everyone who got in the WL, did you interview?
Anticipating my rejection...
Anticipating my rejection...
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:24 pm
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by trombalontana on Sun Jun 14, 2015 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
no interviewssanonymous wrote:Everyone who got in the WL, did you interview?
Anticipating my rejection...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congrats! That's awesome!banjo wrote:IN!!!! And btw I interviewed for this one, so I guess I'm not an asparagus like Regulus. Also, unless CLS matches/exceeds Chicago's COA, my cycle is over!
-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So jealous. Maybe now they will finally move on to us Nov submitters who are still not under review.
Congratulations to all new admits!
Congratulations to all new admits!
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
onionz wrote:waitlisted at UChiago
helix23 wrote:WLed via email.
I've haven't been this scared all month.bailey8078 wrote:WL
SOMEONE HOLD ME. D:
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 12:02 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
congrats to everyone who got in today!
one question. did anybody who went complete in november and/or went under review in january get their decisions today?
one question. did anybody who went complete in november and/or went under review in january get their decisions today?
Last edited by karina on Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks for the info. Also, just looked at your stats, no idea how you didn't get in. You're off to bigger and better things anyway!helix23 wrote:no interviewssanonymous wrote:Everyone who got in the WL, did you interview?
Anticipating my rejection...
- sean21
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:45 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
WL no interview
- reallysearch
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:57 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Now we have more data points so maybe someone can do an analysis of the significance of interview?



- Jaqen
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congratulations to all the admits! 

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
eh, I'm not too surprised with my gpa. Thanks though!ssanonymous wrote:Thanks for the info. Also, just looked at your stats, no idea how you didn't get in. You're off to bigger and better things anyway!helix23 wrote:no interviewssanonymous wrote:Everyone who got in the WL, did you interview?
Anticipating my rejection...
- Ramius
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:39 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
WL, hardly surprised. Congrats to everyone who was accepted!
For info, no interview and really didn't expect one.
For info, no interview and really didn't expect one.
Last edited by Ramius on Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- facile princeps
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
WLed via email, too.
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:35 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
WL via email. Interviewed on 12/13 (I think). Congrats to the admits!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:26 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Waitlist with an interview that I thought went well 

- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
YP bro.kcam1991 wrote:Waitlist with an interview that I thought went well
- lsatprepguy
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:04 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
In! ahhh.
interviewed about a week ago.
interviewed about a week ago.
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Wtf fdshafdsa I'm innnn and I didn't think I had a chance in hell
3.46/173
I can't foresee any possible better outcomes than this so I'll almost surely see you guys at Chicago in the fall!!
3.46/173
I can't foresee any possible better outcomes than this so I'll almost surely see you guys at Chicago in the fall!!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
CONGRATS!!!!!!!Crowing wrote:Wtf fdshafdsa I'm innnn and I didn't think I had a chance in hell
3.46/173
I can't foresee any possible better outcomes than this so I'll almost surely see you guys at Chicago in the fall!!
- Mr. Elshal
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
submitted so long ago, no interview or correspondence of any kind since going complete. I was hoping for some closure today but I guess not. Does Chicago usually work in bursts or trickles after the first big wave? And have we as a thread come to a conclusion on how important/required an interview is for admission?
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Ooh I didn't get an email but just checked my Status Checker and it says Admitted: Welcome to the Class of 2016! So even if you haven't received an email check your status checker!
EDIT: Apparently Gmail thinks that an email from chicago.edu and says Welcome to the University of Chicago is spam, so definitely check your spam folders.
EDIT: Apparently Gmail thinks that an email from chicago.edu and says Welcome to the University of Chicago is spam, so definitely check your spam folders.
Last edited by bernaldiaz on Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 3:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login