Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle) Forum
-
Kip

- Posts: 63
- Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2014 3:57 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Any sense that a brief LOCI/Why Stanford email could help on the margins? I know the consensus is that Stanford already knows everyone is dying to go there, but I doubt it could hurt. Thoughts?
- wonka

- Posts: 470
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:46 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
It probably wouldn't hurt, but I wonder, would it really help either?
-
Kip

- Posts: 63
- Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2014 3:57 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Probably not, but I suppose a well-written email could leave a good impression and prompt someone to reopen a file.mwonka wrote:It probably wouldn't hurt, but I wonder, would it really help either?
- fra

- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 2:59 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
I sent a short email with updated resume letting them know that they were my number one squeeze and they rejected me.mwonka wrote:It probably wouldn't hurt, but I wonder, would it really help either?
ETA: 1 data point is useless, but whatever.
-
lawapp1

- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 1:43 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Checked on lawschoolnumbers and didn't see anything- but does anyone know (because they know some non-TLS applicants or something) if the creeping DLS wave has moved up anymore?
-
qwertyTLS

- Posts: 278
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:06 am
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
the creeping DLS date is 11/05, right? http://stanford.lawschoolnumbers.com/applicants
- Bird Lawyer

- Posts: 69
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 9:09 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
DLS today. End of Nov. complete date. 
- curlietop86

- Posts: 291
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:46 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
,
Last edited by curlietop86 on Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Bird Lawyer

- Posts: 69
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 9:09 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Be careful what you ask forcurlietop86 wrote:i would just like to hear something!
- HungarianGirl13

- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 11:52 am
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
I've been complete since 9/22 and still no word!
creeping on 6 months here....
creeping on 6 months here....
- curlietop86

- Posts: 291
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:46 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
.
Last edited by curlietop86 on Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Bird Lawyer

- Posts: 69
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 9:09 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
You will only be truly happy when you pay Stanford $55k a year to attend.curlietop86 wrote:haha at this point i will truly be happy either way.Bird Lawyer wrote:Be careful what you ask forcurlietop86 wrote:i would just like to hear something!
- Oskosh

- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:18 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Didn't a user ITT report a rejection with a submission date of December? A single rejection would be too much of an anomaly, wouldn't it?
-
accessislife

- Posts: 288
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:40 am
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
TCR is DLS no call means rejection right?
- Bird Lawyer

- Posts: 69
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 9:09 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Yeah, I looked back and saw altf4 got rejected as a mid-December submitter. It is possible that we are both just that awful.Oskosh wrote:Didn't a user ITT report a rejection with a submission date of December? A single rejection would be too much of an anomaly, wouldn't it?
- Bird Lawyer

- Posts: 69
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 9:09 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Eventually it can also mean waitlist, although so far those haven't gone out.accessislife wrote:TCR is DLS no call means rejection right?
-
accessislife

- Posts: 288
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:40 am
- pylon

- Posts: 929
- Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:58 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Does anyone roughly know when the first DLS meaning WL came out last cycle?Bird Lawyer wrote:Eventually it can also mean waitlist, although so far those haven't gone out.accessislife wrote:TCR is DLS no call means rejection right?
- Bird Lawyer

- Posts: 69
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 9:09 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
According to LSN the middle of April.pylon wrote:Does anyone roughly know when the first DLS meaning WL came out last cycle?Bird Lawyer wrote:Eventually it can also mean waitlist, although so far those haven't gone out.accessislife wrote:TCR is DLS no call means rejection right?
- mr.plum

- Posts: 70
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:31 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
This page has so many cat avatars 
- Bird Lawyer

- Posts: 69
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 9:09 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Stanford waiters should clearly have a puppy avatar instead.mr.plum wrote:This page has so many cat avatars
- Mack.Hambleton

- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
curlietop86 wrote:i would just like to hear something! complete 10/28/2014; no word.
-
lawapp1

- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 1:43 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Nooo! I worked so hard to maximize my avatar related chances at HYS. I can't handle another constraint.Bird Lawyer wrote:Stanford waiters should clearly have a puppy avatar instead.mr.plum wrote:This page has so many cat avatars
-
The thinker

- Posts: 115
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 7:43 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
I think the avatar should be something to do with wine...as it combines our love of California with the overwhelming desire to drink away our anxiety
- quadsbaby

- Posts: 68
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 2:58 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Stanford's not really so much in wine country though. If you really want to capture Stanford love you need some startupy catch phrases. That or a duck (See "Duck Syndrome").The thinker wrote:I think the avatar should be something to do with wine...as it combines our love of California with the overwhelming desire to drink away our anxiety