you can find me at www.top-law-schools.com! Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
nickhalden

Bronze
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by nickhalden » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:05 pm

lawschool1741 wrote:
nickhalden wrote:
Lions, do you have a source for that? They seem really random to me. I entered the cycle with an LSAT at their 25th and GPA above their 75th - no PT, which is understandable. Got well above Duke's 75th from the September test. Never received a PT.
Never received or never requested? I had to solicit my PT and fee waiver
Both. Solicited several weeks after the Sept scores were released and was denied.

secadc11

Silver
Posts: 601
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:13 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by secadc11 » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:06 pm

Maybe they are worried about YP in your case.

foles

Bronze
Posts: 152
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:00 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by foles » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:08 pm

.
Last edited by foles on Sun Aug 23, 2015 2:40 am, edited 2 times in total.

nickhalden

Bronze
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by nickhalden » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:14 pm

secadc11 wrote:Maybe they are worried about YP in your case.
Maybe. But giving me PT has no effect on their ability to YP me through priority reserve if my application didn't show genuine Duke interest.

secadc11

Silver
Posts: 601
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:13 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by secadc11 » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:17 pm

nickhalden wrote:
secadc11 wrote:Maybe they are worried about YP in your case.
Maybe. But giving me PT has no effect on their ability to YP me through priority reserve if my application didn't show genuine Duke interest.
I see your point. However, maybe they are waiting to see that you want Duke enough to go through the non-PT process with your great stats. It's probably a bit of a stretch, but just a thought.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
lawschool1741

Bronze
Posts: 332
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 6:32 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by lawschool1741 » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:18 pm

.
Last edited by lawschool1741 on Sat Feb 28, 2015 11:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
leslieknope

Silver
Posts: 1114
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:53 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by leslieknope » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:27 pm

.
Last edited by leslieknope on Thu Feb 05, 2015 5:58 am, edited 2 times in total.

Lions1913

Bronze
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:34 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by Lions1913 » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:31 pm

.
Last edited by Lions1913 on Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

secadc11

Silver
Posts: 601
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:13 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by secadc11 » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:32 pm

leslieknope wrote:
jimmymac wrote: I got a PT invite with a 168 before I retook to a highe score.
Yeah, I got PT with a 168 too but with a >75th GPA. I think GPA plays into too. Fee waivers can be really random, though- there have been people with my exact numbers who got fee waivers to a school I didn't. I suspect it kind of depends on when in the cycle you apply and what their medians are looking like.

In other news, the one thing PT is really great for to is getting me to check my status checker 10 times a day. That will make it go even faster, right? :oops:
I suspect the same.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


nickhalden

Bronze
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by nickhalden » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:39 pm

The PT is what it is, but it's frustrating in part because it looks like Duke is so overwhelmed with PT apps that the regular decisions are getting into a worse and worse backlog. Ironically, their anticipation of this is likely why we didn't get PT invites. But it puts us at a real disadvantage for Duke. Conversely, perhaps it places Duke at a disadvantage in our decisions.

User avatar
KissMyAxe

Bronze
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:01 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by KissMyAxe » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:42 pm

Post Deleted
Last edited by KissMyAxe on Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
PN-G bamakid

Bronze
Posts: 178
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:36 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by PN-G bamakid » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:45 pm

My 168 was in the 96th percentile for the September, 2014, LSAT. I did not receive a PT invite, and applied RD.

Hikikomorist

Platinum
Posts: 7791
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:05 pm

Post by Hikikomorist » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:49 pm

.
Last edited by Hikikomorist on Sat Jan 02, 2016 12:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


nickhalden

Bronze
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by nickhalden » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:51 pm

KissMyAxe wrote:
nickhalden wrote:The PT is what it is, but it's frustrating in part because it looks like Duke is so overwhelmed with PT apps that the regular decisions are getting into a worse and worse backlog. Ironically, their anticipation of this is likely why we didn't get PT invites. But it puts us at a real disadvantage for Duke. Conversely, perhaps it places Duke at a disadvantage in our decisions.
Haha, I'm sure they're going to lose a lot of sleep over that.
I'm not stating it negatively (I'm very interested in Duke), but it is an interesting flipside to the PT program. The PT program is designed to incentivize strong/ideal candidates to apply, remain interested in Duke, and eventually matriculate. They are, as we can see, a burden in processing, so Duke must have data that shows they are effective. Being backlogged with PT applicants, Duke is unable to make timely decisions on other applications. If quick admissions decisions increase the likelihood of matriculation, wouldn't delayed admissions decisions be (to at least some degree) detrimental?

User avatar
RedColossus

New
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 3:36 am

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by RedColossus » Wed Jan 14, 2015 9:51 pm

I didn't get an invitation for the Mordecai interview, just a generic scholarship interview which I completed a few days ago. I have a 174 and a 3.98 from a small liberal arts school with good work experience, and it's really been bugging me. Did I not make the cut, or does Duke think I'm not all that interested in them and didn't want to bother because they think I'll go somewhere higher rated? (Which is not the case and I would be upset). Anyways, just wanted to see if I'm on to something or just conceited and in denial haha. Thanks!

Life2good893

Bronze
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 8:22 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by Life2good893 » Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:37 pm

nickhalden wrote:
KissMyAxe wrote:
nickhalden wrote:The PT is what it is, but it's frustrating in part because it looks like Duke is so overwhelmed with PT apps that the regular decisions are getting into a worse and worse backlog. Ironically, their anticipation of this is likely why we didn't get PT invites. But it puts us at a real disadvantage for Duke. Conversely, perhaps it places Duke at a disadvantage in our decisions.
Haha, I'm sure they're going to lose a lot of sleep over that.
I'm not stating it negatively (I'm very interested in Duke), but it is an interesting flipside to the PT program. The PT program is designed to incentivize strong/ideal candidates to apply, remain interested in Duke, and eventually matriculate. They are, as we can see, a burden in processing, so Duke must have data that shows they are effective. Being backlogged with PT applicants, Duke is unable to make timely decisions on other applications. If quick admissions decisions increase the likelihood of matriculation, wouldn't delayed admissions decisions be (to at least some degree) detrimental?
I wonder if regular decision applicants are at a disadvantage due to rolling admissions though. It seems a bit unfair. For example let's say I applied mid- December and a PT applicant applied in early January. The PT applicant is reviewed almost immediately while my app sits in a pile somewhere. So if there are only a few spaces left and the two candidates are both strong, the seat will got to the PT applicant and I would get WL, even though I applied first. See what I mean?

nickhalden

Bronze
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by nickhalden » Wed Jan 14, 2015 11:15 pm

georgetownhopeful893 wrote:I wonder if regular decision applicants are at a disadvantage due to rolling admissions though. It seems a bit unfair. For example let's say I applied mid- December and a PT applicant applied in early January. The PT applicant is reviewed almost immediately while my app sits in a pile somewhere. So if there are only a few spaces left and the two candidates are both strong, the seat will got to the PT applicant and I would get WL, even though I applied first. See what I mean?
I agree that regular applicants are at a disadvantage, particularly if the WL'd PT applicants are on a different WL than regular applicants. I wouldn't say "unfair" - it's a business decision for Duke that obviously pays off since TLS was posting about PT in 2009. I presume that PT applicants matriculate at a higher percentage than regular applicants, although Duke certainly loses some strong candidates through the process. I would be interested in learning how they decide PT invites. It appears that having a good February/June LSAT is a key factor.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
pylon

Silver
Posts: 929
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:58 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by pylon » Wed Jan 14, 2015 11:28 pm

nickhalden wrote:If quick admissions decisions increase the likelihood of matriculation, wouldn't delayed admissions decisions be (to at least some degree) detrimental?
I like this question. I don't think delayed admissions would be detrimental to the same degree that quick decisions are beneficial, however quantifying that difference is something I would imagine Duke would have done and it's quite thought provoking.

foles

Bronze
Posts: 152
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:00 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by foles » Wed Jan 14, 2015 11:31 pm

.
Last edited by foles on Sun Aug 23, 2015 2:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

nickhalden

Bronze
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by nickhalden » Wed Jan 14, 2015 11:36 pm

pylon wrote:
nickhalden wrote:If quick admissions decisions increase the likelihood of matriculation, wouldn't delayed admissions decisions be (to at least some degree) detrimental?
I like this question. I don't think delayed admissions would be detrimental to the same degree that quick decisions are beneficial, however quantifying that difference is something I would imagine Duke would have done and it's quite thought provoking.
My question was largely rhetorical, but I completely agree: Duke has run the PT program long enough that they have the data and the data supports its continued operation. Whatever applicants they lose are outweighed by the applicants they gain through the PT program. Regardless, in this cycle particularly things will probably equalize by March. Being a Duke RD sucks in January, but as Spivey says - we're in a buyer's maker.

User avatar
Eladriel

Bronze
Posts: 268
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:53 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by Eladriel » Thu Jan 15, 2015 11:59 am

Got my Duke swag in the mail--seems to take about a week to arrive.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


GreenTee

Silver
Posts: 1364
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:15 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by GreenTee » Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:37 pm

.
Last edited by GreenTee on Mon Jan 26, 2015 4:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

sheishkabob

Bronze
Posts: 179
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 7:40 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by sheishkabob » Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:52 pm

GreenTee wrote:Just to add a data point to the previous discussion, I got a PT invite in October with a 166 and >75th GPA. Non URM
+2

User avatar
giantswan

Bronze
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:54 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by giantswan » Thu Jan 15, 2015 3:55 pm

Hikkomorist wrote:I have a 3.2 GPA and 173 LSAT, but I couldn't even solicit a fee waiver. Duke was my top choice, but I'm not sure if I should bother applying now.
I applied in September with similar stats and have had radio silence since UR 11/13. Maybe they're just not very splitter friendly...

fireflies

New
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2014 3:18 pm

Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)

Post by fireflies » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:04 pm

giantswan wrote:
Hikkomorist wrote:I have a 3.2 GPA and 173 LSAT, but I couldn't even solicit a fee waiver. Duke was my top choice, but I'm not sure if I should bother applying now.
I applied in September with similar stats and have had radio silence since UR 11/13. Maybe they're just not very splitter friendly...
Could be a specific threshold for splitters
3.5-172 and got waived + PT + admit

In the grand scheme of things, the application fee will represent a small fraction of law school-related payments, and if you would go to Duke if admitted (and I believe those numbers stand a solid chance of admission), it would be a shame to let a lack of waiver stand in your way

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”