Both. Solicited several weeks after the Sept scores were released and was denied.lawschool1741 wrote:Never received or never requested? I had to solicit my PT and fee waivernickhalden wrote:
Lions, do you have a source for that? They seem really random to me. I entered the cycle with an LSAT at their 25th and GPA above their 75th - no PT, which is understandable. Got well above Duke's 75th from the September test. Never received a PT.
you can find me at www.top-law-schools.com! Forum
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
-
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:13 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
Maybe they are worried about YP in your case.
-
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:00 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
.
Last edited by foles on Sun Aug 23, 2015 2:40 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
Maybe. But giving me PT has no effect on their ability to YP me through priority reserve if my application didn't show genuine Duke interest.secadc11 wrote:Maybe they are worried about YP in your case.
-
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:13 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
I see your point. However, maybe they are waiting to see that you want Duke enough to go through the non-PT process with your great stats. It's probably a bit of a stretch, but just a thought.nickhalden wrote:Maybe. But giving me PT has no effect on their ability to YP me through priority reserve if my application didn't show genuine Duke interest.secadc11 wrote:Maybe they are worried about YP in your case.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lawschool1741
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 6:32 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
.
Last edited by lawschool1741 on Sat Feb 28, 2015 11:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- leslieknope
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:53 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
.
Last edited by leslieknope on Thu Feb 05, 2015 5:58 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:34 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
.
Last edited by Lions1913 on Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:13 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
I suspect the same.leslieknope wrote:Yeah, I got PT with a 168 too but with a >75th GPA. I think GPA plays into too. Fee waivers can be really random, though- there have been people with my exact numbers who got fee waivers to a school I didn't. I suspect it kind of depends on when in the cycle you apply and what their medians are looking like.jimmymac wrote: I got a PT invite with a 168 before I retook to a highe score.
In other news, the one thing PT is really great for to is getting me to check my status checker 10 times a day. That will make it go even faster, right?
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
The PT is what it is, but it's frustrating in part because it looks like Duke is so overwhelmed with PT apps that the regular decisions are getting into a worse and worse backlog. Ironically, their anticipation of this is likely why we didn't get PT invites. But it puts us at a real disadvantage for Duke. Conversely, perhaps it places Duke at a disadvantage in our decisions.
- KissMyAxe
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:01 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
Post Deleted
Last edited by KissMyAxe on Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
- PN-G bamakid
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:36 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
My 168 was in the 96th percentile for the September, 2014, LSAT. I did not receive a PT invite, and applied RD.
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:05 pm
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
I'm not stating it negatively (I'm very interested in Duke), but it is an interesting flipside to the PT program. The PT program is designed to incentivize strong/ideal candidates to apply, remain interested in Duke, and eventually matriculate. They are, as we can see, a burden in processing, so Duke must have data that shows they are effective. Being backlogged with PT applicants, Duke is unable to make timely decisions on other applications. If quick admissions decisions increase the likelihood of matriculation, wouldn't delayed admissions decisions be (to at least some degree) detrimental?KissMyAxe wrote:Haha, I'm sure they're going to lose a lot of sleep over that.nickhalden wrote:The PT is what it is, but it's frustrating in part because it looks like Duke is so overwhelmed with PT apps that the regular decisions are getting into a worse and worse backlog. Ironically, their anticipation of this is likely why we didn't get PT invites. But it puts us at a real disadvantage for Duke. Conversely, perhaps it places Duke at a disadvantage in our decisions.
- RedColossus
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 3:36 am
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
I didn't get an invitation for the Mordecai interview, just a generic scholarship interview which I completed a few days ago. I have a 174 and a 3.98 from a small liberal arts school with good work experience, and it's really been bugging me. Did I not make the cut, or does Duke think I'm not all that interested in them and didn't want to bother because they think I'll go somewhere higher rated? (Which is not the case and I would be upset). Anyways, just wanted to see if I'm on to something or just conceited and in denial haha. Thanks!
-
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 8:22 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
I wonder if regular decision applicants are at a disadvantage due to rolling admissions though. It seems a bit unfair. For example let's say I applied mid- December and a PT applicant applied in early January. The PT applicant is reviewed almost immediately while my app sits in a pile somewhere. So if there are only a few spaces left and the two candidates are both strong, the seat will got to the PT applicant and I would get WL, even though I applied first. See what I mean?nickhalden wrote:I'm not stating it negatively (I'm very interested in Duke), but it is an interesting flipside to the PT program. The PT program is designed to incentivize strong/ideal candidates to apply, remain interested in Duke, and eventually matriculate. They are, as we can see, a burden in processing, so Duke must have data that shows they are effective. Being backlogged with PT applicants, Duke is unable to make timely decisions on other applications. If quick admissions decisions increase the likelihood of matriculation, wouldn't delayed admissions decisions be (to at least some degree) detrimental?KissMyAxe wrote:Haha, I'm sure they're going to lose a lot of sleep over that.nickhalden wrote:The PT is what it is, but it's frustrating in part because it looks like Duke is so overwhelmed with PT apps that the regular decisions are getting into a worse and worse backlog. Ironically, their anticipation of this is likely why we didn't get PT invites. But it puts us at a real disadvantage for Duke. Conversely, perhaps it places Duke at a disadvantage in our decisions.
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
I agree that regular applicants are at a disadvantage, particularly if the WL'd PT applicants are on a different WL than regular applicants. I wouldn't say "unfair" - it's a business decision for Duke that obviously pays off since TLS was posting about PT in 2009. I presume that PT applicants matriculate at a higher percentage than regular applicants, although Duke certainly loses some strong candidates through the process. I would be interested in learning how they decide PT invites. It appears that having a good February/June LSAT is a key factor.georgetownhopeful893 wrote:I wonder if regular decision applicants are at a disadvantage due to rolling admissions though. It seems a bit unfair. For example let's say I applied mid- December and a PT applicant applied in early January. The PT applicant is reviewed almost immediately while my app sits in a pile somewhere. So if there are only a few spaces left and the two candidates are both strong, the seat will got to the PT applicant and I would get WL, even though I applied first. See what I mean?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- pylon
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:58 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
I like this question. I don't think delayed admissions would be detrimental to the same degree that quick decisions are beneficial, however quantifying that difference is something I would imagine Duke would have done and it's quite thought provoking.nickhalden wrote:If quick admissions decisions increase the likelihood of matriculation, wouldn't delayed admissions decisions be (to at least some degree) detrimental?
-
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:00 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
.
Last edited by foles on Sun Aug 23, 2015 2:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
My question was largely rhetorical, but I completely agree: Duke has run the PT program long enough that they have the data and the data supports its continued operation. Whatever applicants they lose are outweighed by the applicants they gain through the PT program. Regardless, in this cycle particularly things will probably equalize by March. Being a Duke RD sucks in January, but as Spivey says - we're in a buyer's maker.pylon wrote:I like this question. I don't think delayed admissions would be detrimental to the same degree that quick decisions are beneficial, however quantifying that difference is something I would imagine Duke would have done and it's quite thought provoking.nickhalden wrote:If quick admissions decisions increase the likelihood of matriculation, wouldn't delayed admissions decisions be (to at least some degree) detrimental?
- Eladriel
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:53 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
Got my Duke swag in the mail--seems to take about a week to arrive.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:15 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
.
Last edited by GreenTee on Mon Jan 26, 2015 4:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 7:40 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
+2GreenTee wrote:Just to add a data point to the previous discussion, I got a PT invite in October with a 166 and >75th GPA. Non URM
- giantswan
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:54 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
I applied in September with similar stats and have had radio silence since UR 11/13. Maybe they're just not very splitter friendly...Hikkomorist wrote:I have a 3.2 GPA and 173 LSAT, but I couldn't even solicit a fee waiver. Duke was my top choice, but I'm not sure if I should bother applying now.
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2014 3:18 pm
Re: Duke Law c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 cycle)
Could be a specific threshold for splittersgiantswan wrote:I applied in September with similar stats and have had radio silence since UR 11/13. Maybe they're just not very splitter friendly...Hikkomorist wrote:I have a 3.2 GPA and 173 LSAT, but I couldn't even solicit a fee waiver. Duke was my top choice, but I'm not sure if I should bother applying now.
3.5-172 and got waived + PT + admit
In the grand scheme of things, the application fee will represent a small fraction of law school-related payments, and if you would go to Duke if admitted (and I believe those numbers stand a solid chance of admission), it would be a shame to let a lack of waiver stand in your way
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login