When were you complete?banjo wrote:like five minutes ago - 176/3.76joeycrack wrote:What time?
Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- Cicero76

- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:41 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- banjo

- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
10/10. I also have a much older lsat score in the low 160sCicero76 wrote:When were you complete?banjo wrote:like five minutes ago - 176/3.76joeycrack wrote:What time?
- Lavitz

- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congrats guys!
- kingsfield69

- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:52 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
JS1!
Received email at 11:17 EST.
164/3.89. Submitted 9/16, Complete 10/10.
Received email at 11:17 EST.
164/3.89. Submitted 9/16, Complete 10/10.
- LSATSCORES2012

- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Can you verify that your profile is correct and that you are not a URM? If so, is there anything... unique about your application?kingsfield69 wrote:JS1!
Received email at 11:17 EST.
164/3.89. Submitted 9/16, Complete 10/10.
No matter what... Congrats to you, and all of you!
ETA: your profile says 167?
-
Anonymous4444

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just got a Chicago interview lol was about to be so pumped ihml
- kingsfield69

- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:52 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
The profile is right -- not a URM. But I'm a non-trad veteran with considerable/unique work experiences. Even w/ the softs though, I did not realistically expect anything and certainly not this early in the sequence. Time to prep for an interview -- thanks for the good karma and good luck to you.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Can you verify that your profile is correct and that you are not a URM? If so, is there anything... unique about your application?kingsfield69 wrote:JS1!
Received email at 11:17 EST.
164/3.89. Submitted 9/16, Complete 10/10.
No matter what... Congrats to you, and all of you!
EDIT: profile updated with accurate LSAT.
- kingsfield69

- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:52 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congrats! Huge!Anonymous4444 wrote:Just got a Chicago interview lol was about to be so pumped ihml
- yarsten

- Posts: 184
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:28 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same boat here. Chicago is exciting, but I'm still waiting for that JS1...Anonymous4444 wrote:Just got a Chicago interview lol was about to be so pumped ihml
- helix23

- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congrats guys! Very exciting
- harveyfan

- Posts: 87
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:36 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
kingsfield69 wrote:The profile is right -- not a URM. But I'm a non-trad veteran with considerable/unique work experiences. Even w/ the softs though, I did not realistically expect anything and certainly not this early in the sequence. Time to prep for an interview -- thanks for the good karma and good luck to you.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Can you verify that your profile is correct and that you are not a URM? If so, is there anything... unique about your application?kingsfield69 wrote:JS1!
Received email at 11:17 EST.
164/3.89. Submitted 9/16, Complete 10/10.
No matter what... Congrats to you, and all of you!
EDIT: profile updated with accurate LSAT.
Congrats! It seems like you are having an amazing cycle! I hope mine goes half as well as yours!
-
Anonymous4444

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
thanks and huge congrats to you i know how badly u want that interview.kingsfield69 wrote:Congrats! Huge!Anonymous4444 wrote:Just got a Chicago interview lol was about to be so pumped ihml
hopefully ill get one too soon enough.
- helix23

- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
To be honest, I'm not really used to being a wallflower so just warning you there might be another wave of poetry coming.
-
Anonymous4444

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Anonymous4444 wrote:At this point ID be happy for an interview from Chicago.
somebody. interview. me. now.
man am i emb i wrote this. yes im aware i may be a profit
- kuddlykoala

- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:29 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I thought everyone who applied this year was getting an interview.
-
shntn

- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
wutkuddlykoala wrote:I thought everyone who applied this year was getting an interview.
- kuddlykoala

- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:29 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
https://blogs.law.harvard.edu/admission ... g-process/
http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2012/10 ... views.html
well I guess not everyone...but supposedly more expansive
http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2012/10 ... views.html
well I guess not everyone...but supposedly more expansive
-
aloyshakaramazov

- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Still don't know how they plan to do this with longer interviews....but hey, great for them if they want to interview more people!kuddlykoala wrote:https://blogs.law.harvard.edu/admission ... g-process/
http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2012/10 ... views.html
well I guess not everyone...but supposedly more expansive
-
Anonymous4444

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
random just got ur username happen to be reading that book now lolaloyshakaramazov wrote:Still don't know how they plan to do this with longer interviews....but hey, great for them if they want to interview more people!kuddlykoala wrote:https://blogs.law.harvard.edu/admission ... g-process/
http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2012/10 ... views.html
well I guess not everyone...but supposedly more expansive
-
aloyshakaramazov

- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah dude. Aloysha's clearly awesome PS would make him a shoe-in at HYSAnonymous4444 wrote: random just got ur username happen to be reading that book now lol
Great book though. One of the most under-rated trials in literature is the trial in part 11/12 of BK. Like nine lawyers pass out because they give such impassioned speeches.
- ScratchableItch

- Posts: 429
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 1:10 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
This interview makes it more clear:kuddlykoala wrote:https://blogs.law.harvard.edu/admission ... g-process/
http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2012/10 ... views.html
well I guess not everyone...but supposedly more expansive
http://www.admissionsdean.com/researchi ... sica-soban
In the past they've interviewed around 1000 and accepted about 850, creating a class of about 550.
This year they're aiming to interview around 1200 applicants, so they're expanding it by 200 folks or so.
Congrats to all the new interviews!
- kuddlykoala

- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:29 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
yes yes congrats!
didn't mean to take away from the excitement of it all
-
hdivine

- Posts: 94
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:27 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You know, when you look at yield rate for Harvard (2/3), it means that they have to admit roughly 850 people to fill their 560-person class. 850 JS2s out of 1200 JS1s is pretty substantial. Suffice it to say, a JS1 is a really good sign.
- sinfiery

- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congratz to all JS1s today!
- ssanonymous

- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So pumped about your JS1. I love it when law schools see value in an applicant outside of the typical, rigid numbers. Pretty surprising for HLS this early on in the cycle. Well, I hope you get in!kingsfield69 wrote:The profile is right -- not a URM. But I'm a non-trad veteran with considerable/unique work experiences. Even w/ the softs though, I did not realistically expect anything and certainly not this early in the sequence. Time to prep for an interview -- thanks for the good karma and good luck to you.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Can you verify that your profile is correct and that you are not a URM? If so, is there anything... unique about your application?kingsfield69 wrote:JS1!
Received email at 11:17 EST.
164/3.89. Submitted 9/16, Complete 10/10.
No matter what... Congrats to you, and all of you!
EDIT: profile updated with accurate LSAT.
Congrats to everyone else! Rooting for y'all
Last edited by ssanonymous on Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.