UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- 06102016

- Posts: 13460
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:29 pm
- megagnarley

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
'slack_academic wrote:I kind of wondered if this would happen. It's been happening for years now with the two universities generally, but USC has made steady gains in part because of its fundraising/scholarship advantages. Whereas other schools might worry about a decline in numbers, USC might toss out some hefty $$$ in order to hold its position and in effect climb higher while other schools go backwards, specifically UCLA.megagnarley wrote:USC is throwing around a ton of $$ this year. I think UCLA is struggling to keep up.uconjak wrote:Got in to USC and UCLA. UCLA is one of my top choices but the cash is important also. Only got 48K in scholly from UCLA. USC gave me 120K> I am going to LA next week to see my sis sing at the Hotel Cafe and tour both schools. I have an appointment to discuss my Schollies then with both schools. I will let you all know what happens....some people say UCLA is all BS on wanting to be competitive.....we will see.USCbusinessgrad wrote:Got the acceptance call today too, but I'm kind of bummed now that I see others were offered scholarships... I went complete 1/25, so I was hoping that hearing back this quickly meant $$ was coming with the info he said I'd be receiving. Are scholarship offers always mentioned in the acceptance call?
Any advice? I'm a splitter URM with entertainment business experience
Probably won't make that big of a difference, but it could play out in interesting ways.
Yes.
Make no mistake USC is climbing. I was just speaking with a big entertainment attorney (yes, they exist) yesterday who mentioned the ascension of USC and how he feels they are now, in some respects, outpacing UCLA.
Food for though.
-
Golden Bear 11

- Posts: 169
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:21 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
USC is most likely not going to outpace UCLA. USC is throwing money to maintain a 167 median. UCLA is going to maintain a 168 median. Last year, UCLA WIDENED the gap in the rankings.
- megagnarley

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You're talking about medians and rankings.Golden Bear 11 wrote:USC is most likely not going to outpace UCLA. USC is throwing money to maintain a 167 median. UCLA is going to maintain a 168 median. Last year, UCLA WIDENED the gap in the rankings.
I am talking about how the schools are viewed by practicing lawyers/hiring partners in LA.
Read carefully.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I know of at least one person who would rather boost USCs 75ths than help UCLA maintain their medians. Couple slightly better employment stats with lower COA and you've got a winner. Money talks.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- USCbusinessgrad

- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:29 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hah I totally agreefallingup wrote:I think I'm the only person who didn't like the phone call. Phone calls with authority figures make me incredibly nervous. Why would you put an already admitted student through the emotional wringer of having to suddenly and unexpectedly speak to the dean of admissions!? It felt like another test for me.
- Rlabo

- Posts: 531
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:18 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
USCbusinessgrad wrote:Hah I totally agreefallingup wrote:I think I'm the only person who didn't like the phone call. Phone calls with authority figures make me incredibly nervous. Why would you put an already admitted student through the emotional wringer of having to suddenly and unexpectedly speak to the dean of admissions!? It felt like another test for me.
And I had a great talk with him. He knew one of my recommenders and made it a point to make a joke that I got in despite his poor letter and that I should send my regards.
- jbagelboy

- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You have to relax... and be more prepared for professional interaction. Early success in law school will be just as much about confidence, networking, and personality as it will be about test taking.USCbusinessgrad wrote:Hah I totally agreefallingup wrote:I think I'm the only person who didn't like the phone call. Phone calls with authority figures make me incredibly nervous. Why would you put an already admitted student through the emotional wringer of having to suddenly and unexpectedly speak to the dean of admissions!? It felt like another test for me.
- laura2011

- Posts: 52
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 3:49 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
btw, I just got a reply from Dean Schwartz asking where I would be going instead. not that I mind telling but is this standard practice? does anyone know / any similar experiences?laura2011 wrote:Just withdrew (was admitted back in November).
I hope this opens up a spot for somebody else! Good luck to those still waiting on a decision!
- letitloose

- Posts: 139
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:13 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Not sure if it's standard practice, but I was asked the same thing by a different school. I had a similar reaction. I hadn't committed to a particular school yet, and I just responded with that.laura2011 wrote:btw, I just got a reply from Dean Schwartz asking where I would be going instead. not that I mind telling but is this standard practice? does anyone know / any similar experiences?laura2011 wrote:Just withdrew (was admitted back in November).
I hope this opens up a spot for somebody else! Good luck to those still waiting on a decision!
-
zman

- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I don't think UCLA is struggling to keep up with USC but USC is throwing more money around this time it seems. UCLA already has huge GPAs, I dont know how they can move up anymore in the rankings really because Cornell has better employment numbers and better peer reviews despite having lower GPA's than UCLA and even USC. USC on the other hand has a good chance to pass Vanderbilt and texas in the next couple of years.megagnarley wrote:USC is throwing around a ton of $$ this year. I think UCLA is struggling to keep up.uconjak wrote:Got in to USC and UCLA. UCLA is one of my top choices but the cash is important also. Only got 48K in scholly from UCLA. USC gave me 120K> I am going to LA next week to see my sis sing at the Hotel Cafe and tour both schools. I have an appointment to discuss my Schollies then with both schools. I will let you all know what happens....some people say UCLA is all BS on wanting to be competitive.....we will see.USCbusinessgrad wrote:Got the acceptance call today too, but I'm kind of bummed now that I see others were offered scholarships... I went complete 1/25, so I was hoping that hearing back this quickly meant $$ was coming with the info he said I'd be receiving. Are scholarship offers always mentioned in the acceptance call?
Any advice? I'm a splitter URM with entertainment business experience
Last edited by zman on Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
h2opolo

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 1:11 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
To all fellow admitted students, what was in your admissions packet? All I got was the Welcome letter, UCLA Law Magazine, UCLA bulletin, and an old Spring 2012 UCLA Newsletter...
However, on the admitted students site it says the admit packet contents include: Welcome Letter, Contact Information, Information for Welcome Receptions, Websites to Visit, and a 2011-2012 Academic Calendar. I only received one of those (Welcome letter) and am unable to access the other material from the admitted students section. Am I an outlier or are others experiencing this?!
However, on the admitted students site it says the admit packet contents include: Welcome Letter, Contact Information, Information for Welcome Receptions, Websites to Visit, and a 2011-2012 Academic Calendar. I only received one of those (Welcome letter) and am unable to access the other material from the admitted students section. Am I an outlier or are others experiencing this?!
- uconjak

- Posts: 357
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:20 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
What are your stats, and where u going.laura2011 wrote:btw, I just got a reply from Dean Schwartz asking where I would be going instead. not that I mind telling but is this standard practice? does anyone know / any similar experiences?laura2011 wrote:Just withdrew (was admitted back in November).
I hope this opens up a spot for somebody else! Good luck to those still waiting on a decision!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- b123

- Posts: 183
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:32 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
JUST DENY ME ALREADY
- dproduct

- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Works so well with the 'tarb123 wrote:JUST DENY ME ALREADY
- dproduct

- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
lol at all this talk about UCLA struggling to compete with USC
-
zman

- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
well they are not struggling wit htat.. they are struggling with bad employment numbers compared to the schools ranked ahead of them other than say georgetown.dproduct wrote:lol at all this talk about UCLA struggling to compete with USC
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- megagnarley

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
LOL at taking things out of context. The initially comment about struggling to keep up was regarding scholarship money, which is absolutely true.dproduct wrote:lol at all this talk about UCLA struggling to compete with USC
- dproduct

- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
megagnarley wrote:LOL at taking things out of context. The initially comment about struggling to keep up was regarding scholarship money, which is absolutely true.dproduct wrote:lol at all this talk about UCLA struggling to compete with USC
So that's what you meant here?megagnarley wrote:Make no mistake USC is climbing. I was just speaking with a big entertainment attorney (yes, they exist) yesterday who mentioned the ascension of USC and how he feels they are now, in some respects, outpacing UCLA.
-
Cali_App_333

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:32 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Not to interrupt the discussion but...IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm so excited and shocked and over the moon, I REALLY did not think I had a shot at anything past maybe the waitlist. Congrats to other admits as well!
I'm so excited and shocked and over the moon, I REALLY did not think I had a shot at anything past maybe the waitlist. Congrats to other admits as well!
- intlsplitr

- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 9:00 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I received the same as you. Info on welcome receptions came by email.h2opolo wrote:To all fellow admitted students, what was in your admissions packet? All I got was the Welcome letter, UCLA Law Magazine, UCLA bulletin, and an old Spring 2012 UCLA Newsletter...
However, on the admitted students site it says the admit packet contents include: Welcome Letter, Contact Information, Information for Welcome Receptions, Websites to Visit, and a 2011-2012 Academic Calendar. I only received one of those (Welcome letter) and am unable to access the other material from the admitted students section. Am I an outlier or are others experiencing this?!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Golden Bear 11

- Posts: 169
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:21 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
He/She is probably a USC student who got rejected from UCLAdproduct wrote:megagnarley wrote:LOL at taking things out of context. The initially comment about struggling to keep up was regarding scholarship money, which is absolutely true.dproduct wrote:lol at all this talk about UCLA struggling to compete with USCSo that's what you meant here?megagnarley wrote:Make no mistake USC is climbing. I was just speaking with a big entertainment attorney (yes, they exist) yesterday who mentioned the ascension of USC and how he feels they are now, in some respects, outpacing UCLA.
- dproduct

- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congrats!!Cali_App_333 wrote:Not to interrupt the discussion but...IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm so excited and shocked and over the moon, I REALLY did not think I had a shot at anything past maybe the waitlist. Congrats to other admits as well!
- megagnarley

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Nope. But then again that wasn't the cited post now was it? How convenient for you.dproduct wrote:megagnarley wrote:LOL at taking things out of context. The initially comment about struggling to keep up was regarding scholarship money, which is absolutely true.dproduct wrote:lol at all this talk about UCLA struggling to compete with USCSo that's what you meant here?megagnarley wrote:Make no mistake USC is climbing. I was just speaking with a big entertainment attorney (yes, they exist) yesterday who mentioned the ascension of USC and how he feels they are now, in some respects, outpacing UCLA.
There I meant exactly what I said: in some respects, such as percentages of recent big firm hires, USC is outpacing LA. The words of a hiring partner, not even my own.
When I first used "Struggling to keep up," which is the actually cited phrase that you alluded to, I said exactly this:
A direct comment about scholarship, then taken liberties with to somehow mean "struggling to keep up in capacity <x>."megagnarley wrote: USC is throwing around a ton of $$ this year. I think UCLA is struggling to keep up.
Questions?
-
zman

- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
"big entertainment atourney". Who?? They have no clue about law school and they don't care.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login