This is usually why they are sent, especially by lower ranked schools like harvurd.t-14orbust wrote:Oh, hopefully that's what he meant. I was under the impression that he meant they send those e-mails in order to boost their selectivity by getting more people to apply and then denying them.maximus92 wrote:CyanIdes Of March wrote:I think you misread, he meant it was a bad sign *for him* because he didn't get it. I think, at least. I'm sure an unsolicited e-mail from Harvard to check out their school (although, why in the world would they need to do that? They're Harvard...) is never a bad sign.t-14orbust wrote:Got that e-mail from JS inviting me to take a closer look at HLS, as if I haven't already dreamt of being admitted. Is it really a bad sign? My numbers are fairly competitive IMO
I agree!
Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
- ArtistOfManliness
- Posts: 590
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:56 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Now I'm even more confused than before.ArtistOfManliness wrote: This is usually why they are sent, especially by lower ranked schools like harvurd.
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by The-Specs on Thu Sep 26, 2013 1:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
- ArtistOfManliness
- Posts: 590
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:56 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
You mad?The-Specs wrote:+10t-14orbust wrote:Now I'm even more confused than before.ArtistOfManliness wrote: This is usually why they are sent, especially by lower ranked schools like harvurd.
Can't tell if he is being sarcastic or not.
I think most schools do it to increase selectivity. I think Harvard might do it just to make sure it gets a good spread of applicants... I really don't think HLS is doing anything about being #2/#3 with SLS.
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by The-Specs on Thu Sep 26, 2013 1:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CyanIdes Of March
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I think we're reading into these letters way too much. If you've got good numbers, as you do t14orbust, then there's no reason they'd send to you for nefarious reasons. Maybe it has to do with the drop in applicants, maybe it's just procedural to get the word out a bit so they have a bigger pool to work with, who knows. 1 year from now we can discuss this in depth and with out all the stress at some restaurant in Cambridge.
- Sourrudedude
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:34 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
+1CyanIdes Of March wrote:I think we're reading into these letters way too much. If you've got good numbers, as you do t14orbust, then there's no reason they'd send to you for nefarious reasons. Maybe it has to do with the drop in applicants, maybe it's just procedural to get the word out a bit so they have a bigger pool to work with, who knows. 1 year from now we can discuss this in depth and with out all the stress at some restaurant in Cambridge.
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by The-Specs on Thu Sep 26, 2013 1:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:46 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I didn't get an email from Harvard, though I did get one from Pacific McGeorge School of Law today, so I can't complain.
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Drinks on meThe-Specs wrote:I like you. Reservation for 2 at said restaurant please.CyanIdes Of March wrote:I think we're reading into these letters way too much. If you've got good numbers, as you do t14orbust, then there's no reason they'd send to you for nefarious reasons. Maybe it has to do with the drop in applicants, maybe it's just procedural to get the word out a bit so they have a bigger pool to work with, who knows. 1 year from now we can discuss this in depth and with out all the stress at some restaurant in Cambridge.
edit: bring girls
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 4:46 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
So do you think we should call the email a JSP(pre)?CyanIdes Of March wrote:I think we're reading into these letters way too much. If you've got good numbers, as you do t14orbust, then there's no reason they'd send to you for nefarious reasons. Maybe it has to do with the drop in applicants, maybe it's just procedural to get the word out a bit so they have a bigger pool to work with, who knows. 1 year from now we can discuss this in depth and with out all the stress at some restaurant in Cambridge.
Anyone else get a JSP? Someone should add a column on the google doc roster.
- Pneumonia
- Posts: 2096
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 3:05 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Similar situation in regard to WE. Did you include Pre-HS graduation jobs on your résumé? I've worked since I was I age- more than half of it full time, but I thought I should only include jobs post-High School. Thoughts?sabanist wrote:Lots of overlap - the only one that didn't was IT. Started retail work as soon as I turned 16 and took whatever else I could find to help keep my family afloat. Law school is going to be the first time since I was legally eligible to have a job that I haven't had one, so that's gonna be weird. I didn't get grilled too hard on the "why no time off, why law now" front in my JS1, and I think having a ton of part-time experience while in school helped with that.t-14orbust wrote:I think the real question here is how sabanist managed to accrue 9 years(yes, I know, they could have overlapped- still impressive nonetheless IMO) of work experience as a K-JD.
- sabanist
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:48 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
This may change for the upcoming year, but last year's application had a question asking you to list all employment and internships. Because this gives you the opportunity to flaunt your work ethic without clogging up a resume, I'd probably stick to post-HS jobs on the resume. I included all of my jobs because the ones I started in high school extended into college and fit my "I'm a hard worker" app theme, but if you have full time experience, I'd emphasize that. The only question asked of my resume during my JS1 was about a particular job overlap that made for a 40 hour work week on top of classes, and that seems to fit with HLS's emphasis on full time WE.Pneumonia wrote: Similar situation in regard to WE. Did you include Pre-HS graduation jobs on your résumé? I've worked since I was I age- more than half of it full time, but I thought I should only include jobs post-High School. Thoughts?
If you have a HS job/internship that really informed your decision to go to law school (internship at a DA's office or something), it might be better to discuss that in your PS.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ThePiedPiper
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 6:50 pm
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 12:38 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Checking in. Wishing everyone a great cycle!
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Finished the intro paragraph of my first draft PS today
Finally making some progress lol

- CyanIdes Of March
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Feels good to have that out of the way. I finished it about a month ago. Waiting until September to give it the final touches.t-14orbust wrote:Finished the intro paragraph of my first draft PS todayFinally making some progress lol
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- jrsbaseball5
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Congrats! How much work did you guys put in on these parts of your app before you were done with the LSAT? I want to get all of my other stuff ready by the time my score comes back in Oct, but don't want to short change the LSAT.t-14orbust wrote:Finished the intro paragraph of my first draft PS todayFinally making some progress lol
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 12:38 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I took the LSAT in June and started working on the PS after I got my results. If you feel like you are going to short change your LSAT studying then I would wait until after you take it to begin writing your PS. Your PS is a subsidiary part of your application that can be important, but not nearly as important as the LSAT. (Lots of emphasis on not nearly!)jrsbaseball5 wrote: Congrats! How much work did you guys put in on these parts of your app before you were done with the LSAT? I want to get all of my other stuff ready by the time my score comes back in Oct, but don't want to short change the LSAT.
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I finished with my LSAT last february so I was just busy finishing up school until this summer. I'd suggest putting in 100% of your effort into the LSAT, and then working on your app during the 3-4 weeks it takes for scores to come out. It really shouldn't take you much longer than that. Of course, you can/should brainstorm the general direction of your PS.jrsbaseball5 wrote:Congrats! How much work did you guys put in on these parts of your app before you were done with the LSAT? I want to get all of my other stuff ready by the time my score comes back in Oct, but don't want to short change the LSAT.t-14orbust wrote:Finished the intro paragraph of my first draft PS todayFinally making some progress lol
- edgeofthenight
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:39 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
...
Last edited by edgeofthenight on Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Checking in. I was held then rejected last year as a non-URM with a 3.9x and 161 (retaking in October), so here's to hoping.
- sashafierce
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 11:44 am
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Don't forget to join the spreadsheet, bros
- Searchparty
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:22 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
For those jobs, I gave them two lines. One for the job title/year/etc. and the second line was just a quick bullet point. The reason I did this was to limit the space on such a stupid thing. Every one knows the duties of a restaurant and retail worker, no reason to try to elaborate or make it seem better than it is. However, put it there because it will show how long you've been working.Pneumonia wrote:Similar situation in regard to WE. Did you include Pre-HS graduation jobs on your résumé? I've worked since I was I age- more than half of it full time, but I thought I should only include jobs post-High School. Thoughts?sabanist wrote:Lots of overlap - the only one that didn't was IT. Started retail work as soon as I turned 16 and took whatever else I could find to help keep my family afloat. Law school is going to be the first time since I was legally eligible to have a job that I haven't had one, so that's gonna be weird. I didn't get grilled too hard on the "why no time off, why law now" front in my JS1, and I think having a ton of part-time experience while in school helped with that.t-14orbust wrote:I think the real question here is how sabanist managed to accrue 9 years(yes, I know, they could have overlapped- still impressive nonetheless IMO) of work experience as a K-JD.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login