Stanford Waitlist 2012 Forum
-
favrefire4

- Posts: 523
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 2:27 pm
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
/
Last edited by favrefire4 on Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- sn20

- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:36 pm
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
/
Last edited by sn20 on Thu Jul 12, 2012 3:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
jim-green

- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
y
Last edited by jim-green on Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Lurkerturnedposter

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:20 am
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
/
Last edited by Lurkerturnedposter on Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
jim-green

- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
.
Last edited by jim-green on Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sn20

- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:36 pm
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
I can't tell if you're being serious or not but in case you are, you can't extrapolate LSN to draw conclusions. LSN is not a random sample and is therefore unrepresentative of the whole applicant pool...i.e. what you're doing doesn't work. Sites like LSN/TLS are much more likely to be populated by applicants with better numbers so the sample will be skewed.jim-green wrote:You have to use real numbers, you cannot use 'approx 700' and 'around 7000'. You need to round off to two decimal places like I did and then you will arrive at the correct answer.Lurkerturnedposter wrote:By this guy's absurd reasoning, a whopping 250 people have been admitted off the Harvard waitlist this year
-
Lurkerturnedposter

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:20 am
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
/
Last edited by Lurkerturnedposter on Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
jim-green

- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
.
Last edited by jim-green on Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- cylon_clone

- Posts: 187
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 6:21 pm
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
My heart breaks a little more after each day of suspenseful waiting...
I refuse to change my avatar before a decision is made...

not yet Wolverine. not yet.
I refuse to change my avatar before a decision is made...

not yet Wolverine. not yet.
- sn20

- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:36 pm
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
This thread is so quiet. Let's have a party.
-
adam1

- Posts: 179
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:36 am
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
I want change to happen.
- cylon_clone

- Posts: 187
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 6:21 pm
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
adam1 wrote:I want change to happen.

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Stig

- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 2:00 am
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
I don't think SLS is admitting less TLS/LSN people off the wait list because of its #2 ranking.justwalkawayrenee wrote:Well, that sucks for those of us who applied S but not Y or H.Elendil wrote:Harvard has over 20 confirmed waitlist acceptances on TLS alone and last I checked the Yale TLS thread there were 5-10 waitlist acceptances.justwalkawayrenee wrote:Is that true? I checked LSN last night and it looked like Yale hadn't made any waitlist decisions yet, and Harvard only had a few acceptances so farElendil wrote:Isn't it possible that Stanford won't have much waitlist movement this year? It seems like both Harvard and Yale took far more than usual off the waitlist so far, so it's very possible that more applicants than usual enrolled at SLS.
EDIT: Also, I worried that Stanford might over-enroll this year. Curse you, USNWR!
-
adam1

- Posts: 179
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:36 am
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
I'd agree. And I'm curious on your opinion, de facto Stanford-TLS rep that you are (are you in charge of admissions over there yet?). Do you think they're admitting less people off the WL for other reasons? What do you think the chance of WL movement is there? Stanford is my number one choice, yet here I am (many here in the same situation, I'm sure) in the middle of July with no clue what to do to get off this WL. Just wait and hope?Stig wrote:
I don't think SLS is admitting less TLS/LSN people off the wait list because of its #2 ranking.
- cylon_clone

- Posts: 187
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 6:21 pm
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
^ Just sit and wait. Nothing else to do really - besides send off a LOCI if you haven't done so already...
Stanford is my #1 choice as well, but I'd be happy with my #2 choice.
Stanford is my #1 choice as well, but I'd be happy with my #2 choice.
- Stig

- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 2:00 am
Re: Stanford Waitlist 2012
Hah, not yet! Perhaps eventually.adam1 wrote:I'd agree. And I'm curious on your opinion, de facto Stanford-TLS rep that you are (are you in charge of admissions over there yet?). Do you think they're admitting less people off the WL for other reasons? What do you think the chance of WL movement is there? Stanford is my number one choice, yet here I am (many here in the same situation, I'm sure) in the middle of July with no clue what to do to get off this WL. Just wait and hope?Stig wrote:
I don't think SLS is admitting less TLS/LSN people off the wait list because of its #2 ranking.
My theory is that there isn't a lot of TLS wait list movement because more people enrolled than expected. If one assumes that each year Stanford, Yale, and Harvard all admit about the same numbers, then if there is more movement than usual on the other two schools' wait lists, it is because they got less than expected. And if there is less movement on SLS it is because they got more enrollments than expected. There is really no way to know because there are also deferrals, etc., so we will have to wait and see until the numbers come out in the fall. Purely speculation though!
My point was more in the anti-TLS groupthink vein. If anyone chooses SLS over HLS because we are now 2 instead of 3, they are not very good at making decisions. That is an absolutely terrible way to pick between peer schools. Hearing that on a stanford waitlist thread makes me cringe!
I've said before that there is always really late movement at all the schools, even if in small numbers. Admissions all the way through orientation for some schools...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login