Reverse splitter--and looks like I'm not alone!

No email though... and I got WL'd in early Feb.

That account is from 2007.luxxe wrote:ED waitlisted admit!!!
But with your GPA & a much lower LSAT. Wtf.
Realized after I posted.Dany wrote:That account is from 2007.luxxe wrote:ED waitlisted admit!!!
But with your GPA & a much lower LSAT. Wtf.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Do we know if receiving one of these emails is a necessary condition to get admitted (or even sufficient?)luxxe wrote:Well, shit. I sent one + a transcript. In January. I wasn't planning on sending another until I graduated & started my internship so I had something new. And could remind them of their sad 3.94 GPA 75th.JamMasterJ wrote:well dammit, it looks like I'm not getting in in the first round of WL admits
Unless the five LOCIs I've sent gave them the idea that I'm still quite interested and that an email asking this would be redundant.
Maybe our ED apps + LOCI(s) were enough to convince them already....
from the WL thread last year, it looked like everyone that got in got the email. But there were several rounds over the course of the summer, so if you didn't get it Monday, you're not screwed yetRopeisaJoke wrote:Do we know if receiving one of these emails is a necessary condition to get admitted (or even sufficient?)luxxe wrote:Well, shit. I sent one + a transcript. In January. I wasn't planning on sending another until I graduated & started my internship so I had something new. And could remind them of their sad 3.94 GPA 75th.JamMasterJ wrote:well dammit, it looks like I'm not getting in in the first round of WL admits
Unless the five LOCIs I've sent gave them the idea that I'm still quite interested and that an email asking this would be redundant.
Maybe our ED apps + LOCI(s) were enough to convince them already....
Is there hope for super splitters or should we just give up?JamMasterJ wrote:from the WL thread last year, it looked like everyone that got in got the email. But there were several rounds over the course of the summer, so if you didn't get it Monday, you're not screwed yetRopeisaJoke wrote:Do we know if receiving one of these emails is a necessary condition to get admitted (or even sufficient?)luxxe wrote:Well, shit. I sent one + a transcript. In January. I wasn't planning on sending another until I graduated & started my internship so I had something new. And could remind them of their sad 3.94 GPA 75th.JamMasterJ wrote:well dammit, it looks like I'm not getting in in the first round of WL admits
Unless the five LOCIs I've sent gave them the idea that I'm still quite interested and that an email asking this would be redundant.
Maybe our ED apps + LOCI(s) were enough to convince them already....
I don't remember your gpa, but I know there was a 177/3.5 in the first round last cycle. I'm guessing that if you're below a 3.4 then you're screwed, but otherwise, you still have a chanceMr. Somebody wrote:Is there hope for super splitters or should we just give up?JamMasterJ wrote:from the WL thread last year, it looked like everyone that got in got the email. But there were several rounds over the course of the summer, so if you didn't get it Monday, you're not screwed yetRopeisaJoke wrote:Do we know if receiving one of these emails is a necessary condition to get admitted (or even sufficient?)luxxe wrote:
Well, shit. I sent one + a transcript. In January. I wasn't planning on sending another until I graduated & started my internship so I had something new. And could remind them of their sad 3.94 GPA 75th.
Maybe our ED apps + LOCI(s) were enough to convince them already....
Last year, at least two super splitters got in off the waitlist (mid May I think?) - czelede and eecs. Both had 3.2/177s.Mr. Somebody wrote: Is there hope for super splitters or should we just give up?
no. I doubt they expect WL>admits to do anything more than preserve medians. If you can do that with both, then you're a very hot commodity.RopeisaJoke wrote:So is it only splitters that get off waitlists, with the reason being because the can boost medians? Does that mean those of us with both numbers at median have less of a chance?
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
I'm thinking of just withdrawing then. I'm 170, 3.4 and pasty with an ED WL so I'm probably lacking a prayer of getting in.JamMasterJ wrote: I don't remember your gpa, but I know there was a 177/3.5 in the first round last cycle. I'm guessing that if you're below a 3.4 then you're screwed, but otherwise, you still have a chance
Yeah, under both medians is usually the death knell for waitlisters.justicefishy wrote:I'm thinking of just withdrawing then. I'm 170, 3.4 and pasty with an ED WL so I'm probably lacking a prayer of getting in.JamMasterJ wrote: I don't remember your gpa, but I know there was a 177/3.5 in the first round last cycle. I'm guessing that if you're below a 3.4 then you're screwed, but otherwise, you still have a chance
Death knell'd here.JamMasterJ wrote:Yeah, under both medians is usually the death knell for waitlisters.justicefishy wrote:I'm thinking of just withdrawing then. I'm 170, 3.4 and pasty with an ED WL so I'm probably lacking a prayer of getting in.JamMasterJ wrote: I don't remember your gpa, but I know there was a 177/3.5 in the first round last cycle. I'm guessing that if you're below a 3.4 then you're screwed, but otherwise, you still have a chance
+1franklyscarlet wrote:Death knell'd here.JamMasterJ wrote:Yeah, under both medians is usually the death knell for waitlisters.justicefishy wrote:I'm thinking of just withdrawing then. I'm 170, 3.4 and pasty with an ED WL so I'm probably lacking a prayer of getting in.JamMasterJ wrote: I don't remember your gpa, but I know there was a 177/3.5 in the first round last cycle. I'm guessing that if you're below a 3.4 then you're screwed, but otherwise, you still have a chance
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
I think you'll be OKfranklyscarlet wrote:Death knell'd here.JamMasterJ wrote:Yeah, under both medians is usually the death knell for waitlisters.justicefishy wrote:I'm thinking of just withdrawing then. I'm 170, 3.4 and pasty with an ED WL so I'm probably lacking a prayer of getting in.JamMasterJ wrote: I don't remember your gpa, but I know there was a 177/3.5 in the first round last cycle. I'm guessing that if you're below a 3.4 then you're screwed, but otherwise, you still have a chance
I'll surviveJamMasterJ wrote:I think you'll be OKfranklyscarlet wrote: Death knell'd here.![]()
dude, you have absolutely smashed this cycle. I almost wouldn't be surprised to see you get into Chicago after everything you've donefranklyscarlet wrote:I'll surviveJamMasterJ wrote:I think you'll be OKfranklyscarlet wrote: Death knell'd here.![]()
frankly, it was kind of exciting just to be on the waitlist.
ThanksJamMasterJ wrote:dude, you have absolutely smashed this cycle. I almost wouldn't be surprised to see you get into Chicago after everything you've donefranklyscarlet wrote:I'll surviveJamMasterJ wrote:I think you'll be OKfranklyscarlet wrote: Death knell'd here.![]()
frankly, it was kind of exciting just to be on the waitlist.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
eh, well you are still here... they must like somethingfranklyscarlet wrote:
Thanksit's been surreal. But I don't think I'm nearly rigorous enough for Chicago.
ETA: also, my big wins are coming from schools who have a history of valuing my one particularly big soft. Chi doesn't.
you mean the "we're about to review your app. are you still interested" email?WhiteGuy5 wrote:What do we do beyond sending a LOCI to get that email? Send another one?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login