SF City Attorney vs. AUSA NDCA Forum

(Issue areas, International Law, International Public Interest, Public Service in the private sector, Non-Profits, Public Interest Organizations, Government/ government agencies, employment settings)
raymondk

New
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2018 7:00 pm

SF City Attorney vs. AUSA NDCA

Post by raymondk » Mon Dec 16, 2019 8:48 pm

A friend told me about openings in the SF City Attorney's complex lit section. The US Attorney's Office also has a few crim openings. Anyone know anything about how these jobs compare, competitiveness, work/life balance, exit options, etc?

burritotaco

New
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2019 3:20 am

Re: SF City Attorney vs. AUSA NDCA

Post by burritotaco » Tue Dec 17, 2019 2:44 am

Any AUSA position, especially in NDCA, will be extremely competitive. You’d be competing with people coming off top-tier clerkships and/or lots of experience.

City Attorney’s office is also very competitive. Not sure about the complex lit dept in particular, but I imagine it’s tough to get into.

andythefir

Silver
Posts: 701
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:56 am

Re: SF City Attorney vs. AUSA NDCA

Post by andythefir » Tue Dec 17, 2019 10:43 am

I don’t mean to be a Debbie Downer, but I bet the NDCA USAO is the most difficult legal job to get in the world. SDNY and CDCA are tough, but at least those offices are huge. NDCA San Francisco is tiny, everyone wants to work there, and I’d bet there’s essentially 0 turnover. Sure, there’s been a few spots open in the last few weeks, but there are 36 SCOTUS clerks hired every year, too.

nixy

Gold
Posts: 4478
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am

Re: SF City Attorney vs. AUSA NDCA

Post by nixy » Tue Dec 17, 2019 10:57 am

The SF office is certainly smaller than SDNY/CDCA but it’s not really tiny.

That said, I agree it’s going to be crazy competitive.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Public Interest & Government”