Military Law Forum
- LazinessPerSe
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:18 am
Re: Military Law
I recently completed the interview with Navy JAG. What I'll let on for those still waiting (or the 0-1Ls here) is that the structured interview is not as intimidating as it seems. The best advice I can give to both practice for the interview and during the interview itself is to pay attention to real world problems you have encountered in your life or that you see and how you would "fix" them if you had the opportunity.
If anyone has any questions about the interview, feel free to ask. As a side, though, please don't ask what questions they posed. You'll have to do that leg work on your own.
If anyone has any questions about the interview, feel free to ask. As a side, though, please don't ask what questions they posed. You'll have to do that leg work on your own.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 8:42 pm
Re: Military Law
Current/ex military folks - anyone have some gouge on where to look for ratings/reviews/thoughts on Naval bases? Putting in my preferences for initial duty location, and have a list of places I'd like to get thoughts on. Thanks for any help!
- JCFindley
- Posts: 1283
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:19 pm
Re: Military Law
xerxes wrote:Current/ex military folks - anyone have some gouge on where to look for ratings/reviews/thoughts on Naval bases? Putting in my preferences for initial duty location, and have a list of places I'd like to get thoughts on. Thanks for any help!
My dad was 26 yrs Navy and I have been to a LOT while in the usaf. Be happy to answer non-JAG Qs on any you have in mind.
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 8:46 am
Re: Military Law
Honestly, I wouldn't worry too much about the base itself. Just pick a city you think would be fun to live in. You're going to move after 2 years anyway. That being said, I can probably answer any specific questions you have about most Navy bases.xerxes wrote:Current/ex military folks - anyone have some gouge on where to look for ratings/reviews/thoughts on Naval bases? Putting in my preferences for initial duty location, and have a list of places I'd like to get thoughts on. Thanks for any help!
- JCFindley
- Posts: 1283
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:19 pm
Re: Military Law
Oh, and this......brownshoe wrote:Honestly, I wouldn't worry too much about the base itself. Just pick a city you think would be fun to live in. You're going to move after 2 years anyway. That being said, I can probably answer any specific questions you have about most Navy bases.xerxes wrote:Current/ex military folks - anyone have some gouge on where to look for ratings/reviews/thoughts on Naval bases? Putting in my preferences for initial duty location, and have a list of places I'd like to get thoughts on. Thanks for any help!
It is the town much more than the base that makes or breaks an assignment.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- howell
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:57 am
Re: Military Law
I interned there. JC was correct. There is a huge civilian population working on base (off the top of my head, maybe 18,000 civilians and only ~2,000 military). With the small military presence, military justice wasn't terribly busy. It was a slow summer, and there were maybe 3 courts. There were maybe 3-4 officers doing military justice/adverse actions (besides the SJA and Deputy SJA). When I started, there was 1 ADC on base, but that got bumped to 2 before I left.BruceWayne wrote:Anyone have any experience with Robins in Warner Robins, GA? Particularly in regards to what JAGS are doing there.
Everyone had a time slot during the week when they would go over to the legal assistance office and work there. I think we usually had 1 JAG officer working full-time at the legal assistance office, too, but I don't know if they always did that. There is a large retirement population there, and the legal assistance office seemed really busy. I think there were 4 full-time civilian attorneys working in the legal assistance office.
There was a large group of civilian attorneys (my guess would be in the 12-15 range), several of which were retired JAG officers, but there were also a few that came straight out of law school. We had 1 JAG officer working in the labor section and 1 working in contracting. One of these guys would help out with courts too. We also had a separate reserve JAG office at the time, but I never went over there and didn't really know what they did.
If you have other questions about Robins or Warner Robins, just let me know.
- bouakedojo
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 3:08 pm
Re: Military Law
Did mine today too. It was not intimidating in the least. It was actually fun in some regards.LazinessPerSe wrote:I recently completed the interview with Navy JAG. What I'll let on for those still waiting (or the 0-1Ls here) is that the structured interview is not as intimidating as it seems. The best advice I can give to both practice for the interview and during the interview itself is to pay attention to real world problems you have encountered in your life or that you see and how you would "fix" them if you had the opportunity.
If anyone has any questions about the interview, feel free to ask. As a side, though, please don't ask what questions they posed. You'll have to do that leg work on your own.
Also, I located this on google:
http://www.jag.navy.mil/library/instruc ... 150-1C.pdf
It looks like, if they do a prescreening board, they can establish a cutoff percentile and then give everyone a composite number, based on their LSAT percentile (40%) and their interview score (60%). Whoever makes the cut, then goes on to the next round, where they analyze your app more closely? I dunno. I thought my interview went well. We'll see in December/January.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 5:32 pm
Re: Military Law
Just wanted to post regarding AF JAG assignments. I just accepted my station and it was my 3rd domestic choice. Unlike previously stated, only one base was offered. When I was called I was asked what I thought about X base and if I would like to be stationed there. I was not told if any other option. I said I was happy to go to X as it was one of my top choices. I was told to think it over and talk to my fam/spouse and confirm the next day. So no two choices anymore just FYI. It was not a take it or leave it discussion but felt like the base was being suggested for a reason.
Good luck to all the applicants. I leave for COT in 12 days. Getting excited and a little nervous. I have shin splints right now but they arent too bad. My current PT score/self test is good but kind of concerned about any long runs. Oh well just going to suck it up and bring icy hot lol.
Good luck to all the applicants. I leave for COT in 12 days. Getting excited and a little nervous. I have shin splints right now but they arent too bad. My current PT score/self test is good but kind of concerned about any long runs. Oh well just going to suck it up and bring icy hot lol.
- JCFindley
- Posts: 1283
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:19 pm
Re: Military Law
Good luck and congrats!Starscream15 wrote:Just wanted to post regarding AF JAG assignments. I just accepted my station and it was my 3rd domestic choice. Unlike previously stated, only one base was offered. When I was called I was asked what I thought about X base and if I would like to be stationed there. I was not told if any other option. I said I was happy to go to X as it was one of my top choices. I was told to think it over and talk to my fam/spouse and confirm the next day. So no two choices anymore just FYI. It was not a take it or leave it discussion but felt like the base was being suggested for a reason.
Good luck to all the applicants. I leave for COT in 12 days. Getting excited and a little nervous. I have shin splints right now but they arent too bad. My current PT score/self test is good but kind of concerned about any long runs. Oh well just going to suck it up and bring icy hot lol.
I am pretty familiar with most USAF bases so feel free to PM if you want any first hand info. (Assuming I actually do know anything about it.)
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:41 pm
- bouakedojo
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 3:08 pm
Re: Military Law
Yea, it seems to me that with Level 2, it's more a totality of the circumstances type judgment with the LSAT playing a much lesser role. At least that's the impression I get.balzie94 wrote:Huh. So this answers the question about the importance of the LSAT in Navy JAG. Answer: It's significant. That said, I wonder if it plays much of a role beyond determining whether you move on to Level 2.
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:41 pm
Re: Military Law
FWIW, a friend of mine told me that when he was picked up by Navy, they told him specifically that he earned a perfect interview score. So maybe at Level 2 the interview score matters more. . .
Regardless, to determine how much the LSAT matters in practice, we need to know what the the average interview score is. That memo says the structured interview is scaled on a 0-60 scale. But do most candidates end up scoring 55+ every time? If so, the LSAT becomes extremely important. On the other hand, if the average candidate scores in the 40-50 range, a lower LSAT score can easily be overcome with a great interview.
Candidate A: Interview Score - 58/60; LSAT - 160 (78th percentile). (58) + (78* .4) = 89.2
Candidate B: Interview Score - 50/60; LSAT - 174 (95th percentile). (50) + (95 * .4) = 88
Candidate A (89.2) > Candidate B (88).
Thus, in the above scenario, if a score of 89 determined who moved on to Level 2, David (160 LSAT) beats Goliath (174 LSAT).
Regardless, to determine how much the LSAT matters in practice, we need to know what the the average interview score is. That memo says the structured interview is scaled on a 0-60 scale. But do most candidates end up scoring 55+ every time? If so, the LSAT becomes extremely important. On the other hand, if the average candidate scores in the 40-50 range, a lower LSAT score can easily be overcome with a great interview.
Candidate A: Interview Score - 58/60; LSAT - 160 (78th percentile). (58) + (78* .4) = 89.2
Candidate B: Interview Score - 50/60; LSAT - 174 (95th percentile). (50) + (95 * .4) = 88
Candidate A (89.2) > Candidate B (88).
Thus, in the above scenario, if a score of 89 determined who moved on to Level 2, David (160 LSAT) beats Goliath (174 LSAT).
Last edited by balzie94 on Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:24 pm, edited 7 times in total.
- bouakedojo
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 3:08 pm
Re: Military Law
From my reading of the file, the maximum interview score is a 60. That raw score is taken and added to the LSAT percentile x .4. This then becomes your composite score.balzie94 wrote:FWIW, a friend of mine told me that when he was picked up by Navy, they told him specifically that he earned a perfect interview score. So maybe at Level 2 the interview score matters more. . .
Regardless, to determine how much the LSAT matters in practice, we need to know what the the average interview score is. That memo says the structured interview is scaled on a 1-100 range. But do most candidates end up scoring 90+ every time? If so, the LSAT is extremely important. On the other hand, if the average candidate scores in the 70-75 range, a lower LSAT score can be overcome with a great interview.
Candidate A: Interview Score - 98; LSAT - 160 (78th percentile). (98 *.6) + (78* .4)
Candidate B: Interview Score - 85; LSAT - 174 (95th percentile). (85 * .6) + (95 * .4)
Candidate A (90) > Candidate B (89).
Thus, in the above scenario, if a score of 90 determined who moved on to Level 2, David (160 LSAT) beats Goliath (174 LSAT).
I would copy and paste, but it doesn't let me. See page 17, point #5.
Edit: But yea, I'd agree that in stage 2, the SI would probably matter more.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:41 pm
Re: Military Law
Ah, yes. I misread the scoring. 0-100 is combined LSAT and interview score.
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 8:46 am
Re: Military Law
I've conducted dozens of these interviews - maybe one or two scored over 50.balzie94 wrote:FWIW, a friend of mine told me that when he was picked up by Navy, they told him specifically that he earned a perfect interview score. So maybe at Level 2 the interview score matters more. . .
Regardless, to determine how much the LSAT matters in practice, we need to know what the the average interview score is. That memo says the structured interview is scaled on a 0-60 scale. But do most candidates end up scoring 55+ every time? If so, the LSAT is extremely important. On the other hand, if the average candidate scores in the 40-50 range, a lower LSAT score can be overcome with a great interview.
Candidate A: Interview Score - 58/60; LSAT - 160 (78th percentile). (58 *.6) + (78* .4)
Candidate B: Interview Score - 46/60; LSAT - 174 (95th percentile). (46 * .6) + (95 * .4)
Candidate A (66) > Candidate B (65.6).
Thus, in the above scenario, if a score of 66 determined who moved on to Level 2, David (160 LSAT) beats Goliath (174 LSAT).
- bouakedojo
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 3:08 pm
Re: Military Law
Interesting....brownshoe wrote:I've conducted dozens of these interviews - maybe one or two scored over 50.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:40 am
Re: Military Law
I would be interested to see the interview score distribution.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:01 am
Re: Military Law
Don't freak out too much about the LSAT, the PSB referenced above is not used often, typically they just go right to the accessions board. Most of the interviews I have done have been in the 35 point range. It is pretty tough to get a perfect score
- LazinessPerSe
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:18 am
Re: Military Law
I called Navy Accessions and was told that the "whole person" concept applies to nearly every part of the application. The LCDR mentioned that the PSB was a rare occurrence, corroborating what NavyJag1 said.
- bouakedojo
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 3:08 pm
Re: Military Law
NavyJAG1 wrote:Don't freak out too much about the LSAT, the PSB referenced above is not used often, typically they just go right to the accessions board. Most of the interviews I have done have been in the 35 point range. It is pretty tough to get a perfect score
Cool. Thanks for the heads up, NavyJAG1 and LazinessPerSe.LazinessPerSe wrote:I called Navy Accessions and was told that the "whole person" concept applies to nearly every part of the application. The LCDR mentioned that the PSB was a rare occurrence, corroborating what NavyJag1 said.
-
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 6:40 pm
Re: Military Law
It would be helpful to know how many ppl move on to the second round as well. Say, if 75% of applicants move on to the second round, then, the LSAT score + the interview score matter a little less then the whole person criteria.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:01 am
Re: Military Law
Again, this is not the typical scenario. In the vast majority of cases there is only one round, the accessions board. It is only if they do the ores creeping board that the equation mentioned above applies.target wrote:It would be helpful to know how many ppl move on to the second round as well. Say, if 75% of applicants move on to the second round, then, the LSAT score + the interview score matter a little less then the whole person criteria.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:48 pm
Re: Military Law
Have an interview coming up with the AF. I just finished reading all 137 pages. Right about page 110 with all of the discussions regarding LSAT, School, and Rankings, I got extremely nervous. I really want to serve and believe I have a lot to offer as a “whole person” concept; however, considering the above, I am not sure if I have any chance to stand whatsoever
.

- howell
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:57 am
Re: Military Law
What made you nervous? Aren't you a 1L? You shouldn't even have grades yet.newbie_05 wrote:Have an interview coming up with the AF. I just finished reading all 137 pages. Right about page 110 with all of the discussions regarding LSAT, School, and Rankings, I got extremely nervous. I really want to serve and believe I have a lot to offer as a “whole person” concept; however, considering the above, I am not sure if I have any chance to stand whatsoever.
- abogadesq
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 1:30 am
Re: Military Law
How limited are private employment opportunities after JAG? How about while serving in the JAG Army Reserve?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login