More BigLaw TikTok drama! Forum

(Advantages vs Disadvantages, Big Law, Work-Life Balance, Hiring Practices, Company Culture, Hours and Compensation, Private Sector Firm Reviews & Experiences)
Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Apr 29, 2023 11:06 am

urbancowboy wrote:
Fri Apr 28, 2023 11:06 pm
*DJ Khaled Voice* "Another one!"

https://www.tiktok.com/@legallypriscill ... 9854226731
What stands out is that this content creator is self-impressed and constantly wants credit for doing things that any competent working professional does on a daily basis:
- "I was there taking thorough notes y'all"
- "I had a counter to every point they made"
- "I came prepared!"

As opposed to showing up to a meeting with general counsel unprepared? :lol:

At one point she informs us that in her mind, these things are demonstrative of her playing a chess game.

"Whether or not they heard me; I heard me. My ANCESTORS HEARD ME." This made me cringe so hard that I left my body.

She's playing up the transparency angle for her tiktok followers but at least a part of her understands that the payments for her new E450 coupe have to come from somewhere. If she is leaves STB, it won't be her choice.

User avatar
HenryHankPalmer

Bronze
Posts: 325
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 6:39 pm

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by HenryHankPalmer » Sat Apr 29, 2023 1:08 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:47 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:40 pm
Those associates need a TikTok presence so Kirkland will fear firing them.
Considering the number of attorneys Kirkland has and the rate at which these Tiktok "stars" are popping up... a little surprised we haven't found a Kirkland attorney yet. Could be the requisite that to join Kirkland, one must lack personality and any and all passion in life.
One of the first popular Biglaw TikTok influencers was a Kirkland LA lit associate. I want to say her @ was ellewoodsesq or something like that, but I can’t find it anywhere so she must have deleted her account.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Apr 29, 2023 2:11 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 10:55 am
I'm living for every drop now.
Me too. If I weren’t in this line of work, I prob wouldn’t find this interesting. But since I am, my mind is blown.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Apr 29, 2023 2:39 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 2:11 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 10:55 am
I'm living for every drop now.
Me too. If I weren’t in this line of work, I prob wouldn’t find this interesting. But since I am, my mind is blown.
Likewise. We need one of those mega threads for cringe big law tiktokers.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Apr 29, 2023 3:13 pm

urbancowboy wrote:
Fri Apr 28, 2023 11:06 pm
*DJ Khaled Voice* "Another one!"

https://www.tiktok.com/@legallypriscill ... 9854226731
It's an absolute farce that STB allows her to carry on like this, while "Non-Diverse" associates across biglaw are being canned for horseshit reasons (or no reason at all) right now.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Sackboy

Silver
Posts: 1044
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:14 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Sackboy » Sat Apr 29, 2023 6:44 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 3:13 pm
urbancowboy wrote:
Fri Apr 28, 2023 11:06 pm
*DJ Khaled Voice* "Another one!"

https://www.tiktok.com/@legallypriscill ... 9854226731
It's an absolute farce that STB allows her to carry on like this, while "Non-Diverse" associates across biglaw are being canned for horseshit reasons (or no reason at all) right now.
Really went full "mask off" here, but I guess we can still call it mask on, because you're hiding your racism through anon abuse.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:03 pm

Sackboy wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 6:44 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 3:13 pm
urbancowboy wrote:
Fri Apr 28, 2023 11:06 pm
*DJ Khaled Voice* "Another one!"

https://www.tiktok.com/@legallypriscill ... 9854226731
It's an absolute farce that STB allows her to carry on like this, while "Non-Diverse" associates across biglaw are being canned for horseshit reasons (or no reason at all) right now.
Really went full "mask off" here, but I guess we can still call it mask on, because you're hiding your racism through anon abuse.
There’s no other explanation for how this person still works at STB. If that’s racist, then ok dude.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:51 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:03 pm
Sackboy wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 6:44 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 3:13 pm
urbancowboy wrote:
Fri Apr 28, 2023 11:06 pm
*DJ Khaled Voice* "Another one!"

https://www.tiktok.com/@legallypriscill ... 9854226731
It's an absolute farce that STB allows her to carry on like this, while "Non-Diverse" associates across biglaw are being canned for horseshit reasons (or no reason at all) right now.
Really went full "mask off" here, but I guess we can still call it mask on, because you're hiding your racism through anon abuse.
There’s no other explanation for how this person still works at STB. If that’s racist, then ok dude.
Yes, it's literally racist.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Apr 29, 2023 10:12 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:51 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:03 pm
Sackboy wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 6:44 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 3:13 pm
urbancowboy wrote:
Fri Apr 28, 2023 11:06 pm
*DJ Khaled Voice* "Another one!"

https://www.tiktok.com/@legallypriscill ... 9854226731
It's an absolute farce that STB allows her to carry on like this, while "Non-Diverse" associates across biglaw are being canned for horseshit reasons (or no reason at all) right now.
Really went full "mask off" here, but I guess we can still call it mask on, because you're hiding your racism through anon abuse.
There’s no other explanation for how this person still works at STB. If that’s racist, then ok dude.
Yes, it's literally racist.
How is it "literally" racist? Genuinely asking

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Apr 29, 2023 10:42 pm

I'm an old fashioned liberal. Just treat people the same. People should not get special privileges or allowances for being white or black or whatever, male or female or whatever.

Wanderingdrock

Bronze
Posts: 202
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 5:49 pm

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Wanderingdrock » Sun Apr 30, 2023 12:26 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 10:12 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:51 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:03 pm
Sackboy wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 6:44 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 3:13 pm
urbancowboy wrote:
Fri Apr 28, 2023 11:06 pm
*DJ Khaled Voice* "Another one!"

https://www.tiktok.com/@legallypriscill ... 9854226731
It's an absolute farce that STB allows her to carry on like this, while "Non-Diverse" associates across biglaw are being canned for horseshit reasons (or no reason at all) right now.
Really went full "mask off" here, but I guess we can still call it mask on, because you're hiding your racism through anon abuse.
There’s no other explanation for how this person still works at STB. If that’s racist, then ok dude.
Yes, it's literally racist.
How is it "literally" racist? Genuinely asking
Assuming the reason this lawyer is still employed at her Biglaw firm is the color of her skin is "literally" racist. That is, in fact, the proper use of the word "literal." It is a thing that is actually racist. Congrats! You learned a word today!

Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Apr 30, 2023 12:46 am

Wanderingdrock wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 12:26 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 10:12 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:51 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:03 pm
Sackboy wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 6:44 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 3:13 pm
urbancowboy wrote:
Fri Apr 28, 2023 11:06 pm
*DJ Khaled Voice* "Another one!"

https://www.tiktok.com/@legallypriscill ... 9854226731
It's an absolute farce that STB allows her to carry on like this, while "Non-Diverse" associates across biglaw are being canned for horseshit reasons (or no reason at all) right now.
Really went full "mask off" here, but I guess we can still call it mask on, because you're hiding your racism through anon abuse.
There’s no other explanation for how this person still works at STB. If that’s racist, then ok dude.
Yes, it's literally racist.
How is it "literally" racist? Genuinely asking
Assuming the reason this lawyer is still employed at her Biglaw firm is the color of her skin is "literally" racist. That is, in fact, the proper use of the word "literal." It is a thing that is actually racist. Congrats! You learned a word today!
How does that imply that one race is superior to another?

Moneytrees

Silver
Posts: 933
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Moneytrees » Sun Apr 30, 2023 8:04 am

Need a new cringe drop, I'm getting addicted to her TikTok.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Apr 30, 2023 9:33 am

Wanderingdrock wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 12:26 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 10:12 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:51 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:03 pm
Sackboy wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 6:44 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 3:13 pm
urbancowboy wrote:
Fri Apr 28, 2023 11:06 pm
*DJ Khaled Voice* "Another one!"

https://www.tiktok.com/@legallypriscill ... 9854226731
It's an absolute farce that STB allows her to carry on like this, while "Non-Diverse" associates across biglaw are being canned for horseshit reasons (or no reason at all) right now.
Really went full "mask off" here, but I guess we can still call it mask on, because you're hiding your racism through anon abuse.
There’s no other explanation for how this person still works at STB. If that’s racist, then ok dude.
Yes, it's literally racist.
How is it "literally" racist? Genuinely asking
Assuming the reason this lawyer is still employed at her Biglaw firm is the color of her skin is "literally" racist. That is, in fact, the proper use of the word "literal." It is a thing that is actually racist. Congrats! You learned a word today!
It is pretty well known in biglaw and outside of biglaw that diverse candidates in corporate settings get more wiggle room for mistakes for DEI purposes

Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Apr 30, 2023 10:03 am

Wanderingdrock wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 12:26 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 10:12 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:51 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:03 pm
Sackboy wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 6:44 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 3:13 pm
urbancowboy wrote:
Fri Apr 28, 2023 11:06 pm
*DJ Khaled Voice* "Another one!"

https://www.tiktok.com/@legallypriscill ... 9854226731
It's an absolute farce that STB allows her to carry on like this, while "Non-Diverse" associates across biglaw are being canned for horseshit reasons (or no reason at all) right now.
Really went full "mask off" here, but I guess we can still call it mask on, because you're hiding your racism through anon abuse.
There’s no other explanation for how this person still works at STB. If that’s racist, then ok dude.
Yes, it's literally racist.
How is it "literally" racist? Genuinely asking
Assuming the reason this lawyer is still employed at her Biglaw firm is the color of her skin is "literally" racist. That is, in fact, the proper use of the word "literal." It is a thing that is actually racist. Congrats! You learned a word today!
Are you asserting this isn't the case? Can you say with a straight face that a white kid would have been given the same leeway?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Apr 30, 2023 10:41 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 10:03 am
Wanderingdrock wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 12:26 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 10:12 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:51 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:03 pm
Sackboy wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 6:44 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Apr 29, 2023 3:13 pm


It's an absolute farce that STB allows her to carry on like this, while "Non-Diverse" associates across biglaw are being canned for horseshit reasons (or no reason at all) right now.
Really went full "mask off" here, but I guess we can still call it mask on, because you're hiding your racism through anon abuse.
There’s no other explanation for how this person still works at STB. If that’s racist, then ok dude.
Yes, it's literally racist.
How is it "literally" racist? Genuinely asking
Assuming the reason this lawyer is still employed at her Biglaw firm is the color of her skin is "literally" racist. That is, in fact, the proper use of the word "literal." It is a thing that is actually racist. Congrats! You learned a word today!
Are you asserting this isn't the case? Can you say with a straight face that a white kid would have been given the same leeway?
x2. Can anyone show me a white guy in biglaw who is (i) engaging in the same behavior and (ii) getting off scott-free? Because if such a gentleman exists, I think he'd be getting invited to a Zoom of Death, not a meeting with the firm's general counsel.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Apr 30, 2023 10:49 am

The thing is, none of us knows anything about her work ability and general standing with people she works with regularly (the mistakes she talks about in one of the videos notwithstanding). You can speculate if you like but that’s all it is. Also, unless you can point to a white dude who has been fired for such behavior, the comparison isn’t helpful.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Apr 30, 2023 10:57 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 10:49 am
The thing is, none of us knows anything about her work ability and general standing with people she works with regularly (the mistakes she talks about in one of the videos notwithstanding). You can speculate if you like but that’s all it is. Also, unless you can point to a white dude who has been fired for such behavior, the comparison isn’t helpful.
Given that you can't point to a single "white dude" who is on TikTok bashing his firm & admitting the firm's work product has mistakes, we don't even need to go the next step.

Tableau

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:11 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Tableau » Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:18 am

Can we just stick to discussing the cringe aspects of her videos and not concern ourselves with whether she would still have her job if she weren’t an underrepresented minority? I don’t think the question itself is racist but this is moving into territory that is likely going to result in this thread being shut down. Don’t want this to happen as the thread has been entertaining.

User avatar
MergerQueen

New
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2022 12:49 pm

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by MergerQueen » Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:27 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 10:49 am
The thing is, none of us knows anything about her work ability and general standing with people she works with regularly (the mistakes she talks about in one of the videos notwithstanding). You can speculate if you like but that’s all it is. Also, unless you can point to a white dude who has been fired for such behavior, the comparison isn’t helpful.
There was a white man at Northwestern with a prominent TikTok account. His offer to summer at Sidley Austin was revoked on account of the controversy that it stirred up.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:42 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 10:57 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 10:49 am
The thing is, none of us knows anything about her work ability and general standing with people she works with regularly (the mistakes she talks about in one of the videos notwithstanding). You can speculate if you like but that’s all it is. Also, unless you can point to a white dude who has been fired for such behavior, the comparison isn’t helpful.
Given that you can't point to a single "white dude" who is on TikTok bashing his firm & admitting the firm's work product has mistakes, we don't even need to go the next step.
I mean, if there aren’t any, you can’t insist they’d get fired sooner than this chick.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:43 am

MergerQueen wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:27 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 10:49 am
The thing is, none of us knows anything about her work ability and general standing with people she works with regularly (the mistakes she talks about in one of the videos notwithstanding). You can speculate if you like but that’s all it is. Also, unless you can point to a white dude who has been fired for such behavior, the comparison isn’t helpful.
There was a white man at Northwestern with a prominent TikTok account. His offer to summer at Sidley Austin was revoked on account of the controversy that it stirred up.
The controversy there that doesn’t exist here was that he was accused of sexual assault.

Edit: I should clarify and say that I’m not saying that I think what this woman is doing is a great idea, at all. She may yet get fired. I just think all the “a white guy would never get away with this” talk is kind of gross.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:45 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:42 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 10:57 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 10:49 am
The thing is, none of us knows anything about her work ability and general standing with people she works with regularly (the mistakes she talks about in one of the videos notwithstanding). You can speculate if you like but that’s all it is. Also, unless you can point to a white dude who has been fired for such behavior, the comparison isn’t helpful.
Given that you can't point to a single "white dude" who is on TikTok bashing his firm & admitting the firm's work product has mistakes, we don't even need to go the next step.
I mean, if there aren’t any, you can’t insist they’d get fired sooner than this chick.
There aren’t any because they know they’d be fired. This person is rubbing the STB partnership’s nose (and the noses of everyone else) in her protected status. With that said, I’m not calling for anybody to lose their job. She should delete her TikTok account, apologize to her firm, and then thank God she still has a highly remunerative professional job.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:45 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 10:49 am
The thing is, none of us knows anything about her work ability and general standing with people she works with regularly (the mistakes she talks about in one of the videos notwithstanding). You can speculate if you like but that’s all it is. Also, unless you can point to a white dude who has been fired for such behavior, the comparison isn’t helpful.
I can't even point to a white guy who has a TikTok while in biglaw. I wonder why that is?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428831
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: More BigLaw TikTok drama!

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:48 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:45 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:42 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 10:57 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 10:49 am
The thing is, none of us knows anything about her work ability and general standing with people she works with regularly (the mistakes she talks about in one of the videos notwithstanding). You can speculate if you like but that’s all it is. Also, unless you can point to a white dude who has been fired for such behavior, the comparison isn’t helpful.
Given that you can't point to a single "white dude" who is on TikTok bashing his firm & admitting the firm's work product has mistakes, we don't even need to go the next step.
I mean, if there aren’t any, you can’t insist they’d get fired sooner than this chick.
There aren’t any because they know they’d be fired. This person is rubbing the STB partnership’s nose (and the noses of everyone else) in her protected status. With that said, I’m not calling for anybody to lose their job. She should delete her TikTok account, apologize to her firm, and then thank God she still has a highly remunerative professional job.
See my edit above about how this kind of comparison is gross. She’s not rubbing everyone’s nose in her “protected” status. Again, I’m not saying that she’s using TikTok wisely, but the racial elements to the discussion are gross.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Big Law/Private Practice Jobs”