PT 35 Forum
- LawandOrder
- Posts: 591
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:36 pm
Re: PT 35
I did this test earlier today for prep and was very pleasantly surprised to find that I had never done the games section before at all!
In light of that, I found it comparable to most other games sections, and got a -0 on it.
In light of that, I found it comparable to most other games sections, and got a -0 on it.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 3:31 pm
Re: PT 35
I have always thought this was probably the most difficult group of four games LSAC had ever assembled (at least since the changes in the early 1990s).krislaw25 wrote:Did anyone else find the games section on this extremely difficult?
Thanks?
- theZeigs
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:26 pm
Re: PT 35
Just did this, wow, these games destroyed me. Any other thoughts from the next generation?
EDIT: found this: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =6&t=83564
evidently this is a common problem!
Hope it doesn't repeat in June.
EDIT: found this: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =6&t=83564
evidently this is a common problem!
Hope it doesn't repeat in June.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- theZeigs
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:26 pm
Re: PT 35
Very impressive.am060459 wrote:i did PT 35 last week and i finished the logic games section with 12 minutes left. i was -2.
which game(s) gave you difficulty?
Games 2 and 4 are particularly problematic. With game 2, I can make basically two templates, but it still took me about 12 minutes the second time through, and I still missed one (the last one - just realized that the "new rule" is effectively no different than the one replaced and that basically this rule just makes it so that X doesn't need to have a sunroof. I would be interested in seeing your setup for this game....was the cars or the options your base?
Game 3 was meh. Game 1 took me about 6 minutes when I did it again today; the key for me was setting up a base that made it very easy to see if geologists/radiobiologists and experienced/inexperienced were used. Flew through it.
Haven't redone game 4 yet but when I did it, I must have messed up an inference. Would also appreciate seeing a setup here, if you can scan/photograph/otherwise digitize.
thanks
-
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Re: PT 35
Game 4:theZeigs wrote:Haven't redone game 4 yet but when I did it, I must have messed up an inference. Would also appreciate seeing a setup here, if you can scan/photograph/otherwise digitize.

-
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:14 am
Re: PT 35
bp colin wrote:Make the cars your base, and with the deductions 6-11 become incredibly easy. It boils down to this:
T: P/S/L
V: P, S
W: P, L
X: P, L, S
Y: S
Z: P/S, L
#12 is also very easy doing it this way.
Cambridge LSAT wrote:Game 4:theZeigs wrote:Haven't redone game 4 yet but when I did it, I must have messed up an inference. Would also appreciate seeing a setup here, if you can scan/photograph/otherwise digitize.
these are exactly my setups.