The Official December 2017 Study Group Forum
- JamesBlahDeBlah
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 12:35 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
I refuse to contribute until we get an official waiters thread. Who with seniority is going to step up?
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:12 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Thank you and let's hope I empathize your 172MediocreAtBest wrote:Lol hey after messing up in September I'm allowed to feel good this time!LittleCrab wrote:I don't like you ToTMediocreAtBest wrote:Feeling good about this one. Feels like a 172+
But i do empathize

- chewinggum
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
RC LR LG RC LR
Probably couldn’t dream for a better set up but v disappointed that ballet/Shakespear wasn’t the real RC.
Also, I feel like LR2 (26) was prob the hardest section out of them all. Around 10-17 it got a little easier but I felt like I was dragging through the first ten then didn’t get to answer 26 with enough thought.
LG seemed easy. The test seemed tolerable, overall (esp compared to Sept)
Probably couldn’t dream for a better set up but v disappointed that ballet/Shakespear wasn’t the real RC.
Also, I feel like LR2 (26) was prob the hardest section out of them all. Around 10-17 it got a little easier but I felt like I was dragging through the first ten then didn’t get to answer 26 with enough thought.
LG seemed easy. The test seemed tolerable, overall (esp compared to Sept)
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:15 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Was your experimental LR section 1? I don't remember any of the questions unfortunately but I know that one of the first 8 questions involved a disagreement/agreement between two people and I was stuck on even that question. Which almost never happens for questions 1-10. I was on like question 18 with 5 minutes left. It threw me off for the next section (LG). And my score is tanked... But the last two LR sections were so average in comparison to practice tests. Exactly what you'd expect. I think the trex one everyone is referencing was one of the real sections though?Mecheman wrote:Same here. I had LR RC LR LR LG. I just can't remember one right off hand that was on that really tough LRJm0987 wrote:I had LR LG RC LR LR. Don't remember the question #s but for those with experimental LR. Did we all have the same experimental? If so, did anyone find that one was extraordinarily difficult? While the other two were pretty standard to sections in prep?
Even questions 1-10 in (hopefully) experimental LR were hard. Threw me off completely. I thought RC and the other LRs were average.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
And yes trex was def realetramak wrote:I thought it was very easy once I finally drew it out correctly. Unfortunately that took me 10+ minutesMikey wrote:LR-RC-LR-LR-LG
was the t rex Q real? pls tell me no, that section was way more difficult than the other 2 I had :/
anyone find the 8 floors game easy BUT annoying? or that just me?
- Experiment626
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Barry, I nominate you as OP. I OPed this one. I don't want to Op another one because I'll be too busy this month to be a good OP.Barry grandpapy wrote:Someone start a waiter's thread
Please
Last edited by Experiment626 on Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- PrezRand
- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
I feel like this test wasn't bad but I think i fked up. Well time to drink 
3 fkin LR sections man

3 fkin LR sections man
Only the last question.Mikey wrote:LR-RC-LR-LR-LG
was the t rex Q real? pls tell me no, that section was way more difficult than the other 2 I had :/
anyone find the 8 floors game easy BUT annoying? or that just me?
Last edited by PrezRand on Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- chewinggum
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
T. rex was real.etramak wrote:I thought it was very easy once I finally drew it out correctly. Unfortunately that took me 10+ minutesMikey wrote:LR-RC-LR-LR-LG
was the t rex Q real? pls tell me no, that section was way more difficult than the other 2 I had :/
anyone find the 8 floors game easy BUT annoying? or that just me?
What was your set up? I did MOD EDIT: NOPE AND BAN
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Anyone remember a LR question about drought/rain/cooler temperatures? Dave killoran tweeted that this question was real but I don't remember anything like that. Worried I skipped it and made a serious bubbling error
- chewinggum
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Yea this was real. It was comparing two cities, C and Tetramak wrote:Anyone remember a LR question about drought/rain/cooler temperatures? Dave killoran tweeted that this question was real but I don't remember anything like that. Worried I skipped it and made a serious bubbling error
Edit: no worries though, it wasn’t a memorable question at all I just happened to write the letters out on the test lol
Last edited by chewinggum on Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 5:49 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
It was either my first or second (T Rex) was my third. But yeah from what I remember the weird one had that weird argument question as #1Jm0987 wrote:Was your experimental LR section 1? I don't remember any of the questions unfortunately but I know that one of the first 8 questions involved a disagreement/agreement between two people and I was stuck on even that question. Which almost never happens for questions 1-10. I was on like question 18 with 5 minutes left. It threw me off for the next section (LG). And my score is tanked... But the last two LR sections were so average in comparison to practice tests. Exactly what you'd expect. I think the trex one everyone is referencing was one of the real sections though?Mecheman wrote:Same here. I had LR RC LR LR LG. I just can't remember one right off hand that was on that really tough LRJm0987 wrote:I had LR LG RC LR LR. Don't remember the question #s but for those with experimental LR. Did we all have the same experimental? If so, did anyone find that one was extraordinarily difficult? While the other two were pretty standard to sections in prep?
Even questions 1-10 in (hopefully) experimental LR were hard. Threw me off completely. I thought RC and the other LRs were average.
-
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
I nominate MikeyExperiment626 wrote:Barry, I nominate you as OP.Barry grandpapy wrote:Someone start a waiter's thread
Please
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Its not that the setup was complicated. My problem was drawing out the inferences. I kept ruling out possible situations as impossible which caused a lot of trouble with POEchewinggum wrote:T. rex was real.etramak wrote:I thought it was very easy once I finally drew it out correctly. Unfortunately that took me 10+ minutesMikey wrote:LR-RC-LR-LR-LG
was the t rex Q real? pls tell me no, that section was way more difficult than the other 2 I had :/
anyone find the 8 floors game easy BUT annoying? or that just me?
What was your set up? I did double layer sequencing but I struggled with noting the first rule. Wtf
- JamesBlahDeBlah
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 12:35 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
SecondedBarry grandpapy wrote:I nominate MikeyExperiment626 wrote:Barry, I nominate you as OP.Barry grandpapy wrote:Someone start a waiter's thread
Please
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Thanks! That makes me remember. I had a bit of trouble deciding between two choices for that.chewinggum wrote:Yea this was real. It was comparing two cities, C and Tetramak wrote:Anyone remember a LR question about drought/rain/cooler temperatures? Dave killoran tweeted that this question was real but I don't remember anything like that. Worried I skipped it and made a serious bubbling error
Edit: no worries though, it wasn’t a memorable question at all I just happened to write the letters out on the test lol
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
since no one started the waiters thread I took it upon myself to lead the pack
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 6&t=283896
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 6&t=283896
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- S0L0
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:01 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Feel pretty good about it. Had the format beginning with RC with two LG and the second LG as Experimental.
Passing secrets Experimental LG can go to hell. I thought both LG were hard but thought Experimental LG was harder. Thought both LR were easy, easy RC (thank you for you candor, LSAC). Wouldn't be surprised if I -1 or -2 each LR, -1 RC, and -6 LG.
Passing secrets Experimental LG can go to hell. I thought both LG were hard but thought Experimental LG was harder. Thought both LR were easy, easy RC (thank you for you candor, LSAC). Wouldn't be surprised if I -1 or -2 each LR, -1 RC, and -6 LG.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:34 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
So, I had an experimental LR, and my test had the following configuration: LR (25), RC, LR (26), LR (26), LG.
For me, 2 LRs were very easy and one was pretty hard. I remember the T Rex Q, but not which section it was in. I really hope that it was my third LR that was the experimental! For people with the same test configuration, was the third LR (26) the experimental?
For me, 2 LRs were very easy and one was pretty hard. I remember the T Rex Q, but not which section it was in. I really hope that it was my third LR that was the experimental! For people with the same test configuration, was the third LR (26) the experimental?
- saffles
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 5:46 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Same. That was the section I was hoping would boost my grade. Turns out that that was the section that would drop it T~Tlittlewing67 wrote:Dude I’m pretty sure I fucked up on LG and that’s my best section. Welp.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:15 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Do you remember any questions from the lr that you think is experimental? I think my experimental LR was LR1. It was super difficult. Not just compared to the other LRs but harder than even some of the tougher LRs from PTs from previous tests. The other two were basically like all other lr sections from prep...georgeNY wrote:So, I had an experimental LR, and my test had the following configuration: LR (25), RC, LR (26), LR (26), LG.
For me, 2 LRs were very easy and one was pretty hard. I remember the T Rex Q, but not which section it was in. I really hope that it was my third LR that was the experimental! For people with the same test configuration, was the third LR (26) the experimental?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:34 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
I remember a question from my second LR section, LR2, (they went LR1 (25), RC, LR2 (26), LR3 (26), LG) that was about a company making exercise classes for its employees to reduce stress and improve productivity. I know LR1 couldn't have been experimental, since it was only 25 questions, so it was either LR2 or LR3. Was the exercise question real?Jm0987 wrote:Do you remember any questions from the lr that you think is experimental? I think my experimental LR was LR1. It was super difficult. Not just compared to the other LRs but harder than even some of the tougher LRs from PTs from previous tests. The other two were basically like all other lr sections from prep...georgeNY wrote:So, I had an experimental LR, and my test had the following configuration: LR (25), RC, LR (26), LR (26), LG.
For me, 2 LRs were very easy and one was pretty hard. I remember the T Rex Q, but not which section it was in. I really hope that it was my third LR that was the experimental! For people with the same test configuration, was the third LR (26) the experimental?
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:15 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Does anyone with the same order of sections have the same experimental/same experimental section?georgeNY wrote:I remember a question from my second LR section, LR2, (they went LR1 (25), RC, LR2 (26), LR3 (26), LG) that was about a company making exercise classes for its employees to reduce stress and improve productivity. I know LR1 couldn't have been experimental, since it was only 25 questions, so it was either LR2 or LR3. Was the exercise question real?Jm0987 wrote:Do you remember any questions from the lr that you think is experimental? I think my experimental LR was LR1. It was super difficult. Not just compared to the other LRs but harder than even some of the tougher LRs from PTs from previous tests. The other two were basically like all other lr sections from prep...georgeNY wrote:So, I had an experimental LR, and my test had the following configuration: LR (25), RC, LR (26), LR (26), LG.
For me, 2 LRs were very easy and one was pretty hard. I remember the T Rex Q, but not which section it was in. I really hope that it was my third LR that was the experimental! For people with the same test configuration, was the third LR (26) the experimental?
I don't remember an exercise question. I could have skipped it or no gotten to it due to how slow I was in the experimental.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:15 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Was the one about camaflouge prey part of a real LR section? I think it was a I WANT TO BE BANNED TYPE OF QUESTION
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login