Retaking from 2010, what PTs are still relevant? Forum

[rahimali]

I have the Powerscore books, the Manny Books and all of the old (10 more actual..) test books. I'm just wondering whether PT# 20-40 are still going to be helpful for me. I'm looking to take at least 25 PTs before I take the LSAT in December.

Thanks

[VeiledProtectorate]

LG and LR are pretty different in the 19-28 book. I used them but I had done 40+ PTs by the time I got to them. 29-38 are pretty good though imo. However, if you're shooting for 25-30 full PTs there are better tests. I'd go through the 52-71 books, and the individual 72-80 tests before doing 29-38. I'd use 19-28 as drilling material.

[Mikey]

All PTs are still relevant. Even if LR and RC has changed from older PTs, the old ones are still relevant for non-PT practice.

Get the most recent 25 though, I'd say.

[rahimali]

thanks fellas.

[hushpuppy]

LG and LR are pretty different in the 19-28 book. I used them but I had done 40+ PTs by the time I got to them. 29-38 are pretty good though imo. However, if you're shooting for 25-30 full PTs there are better tests. I'd go through the 52-71 books, and the individual 72-80 tests before doing 29-38. I'd use 19-28 as drilling material.

Are you guys talking about the PTs that you buy 10 at a time on Amazon, etc.? Like "10 Actual, Official LSAT PrepTests Volume V: PrepTests 62 through 71 (Lsat Series)?" Thanks!

[maybeman]

All PTs are still relevant.