164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic? Forum
-
Prospect24

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:26 am
164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
Took the June 2007 practice cold and got a 164. No one section was significantly worse than the others so I need to practice across the board. Is 11+ point improvement realistic? My gpa is a 3.55 so I'm hopping my LSAT will outweigh GPA. I'm planning to take the LSAT in September so I have time. If anyone has suggestions on how to make this happen that'd be great or if I'm being unrealistic let me know.
-
AJordan

- Posts: 533
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 3:48 am
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
What's realistic? I think I would be reasonably confident getting 3/1 on you but wouldn't do it for less. If you were just LG weak it would be an unequivocal yes. Problem is, depending on curves, you're talking about -5 or less aggregate and at that point randomness plays a much bigger role than someone at 154 gunning for 165.
Also, 175 seems arbitrary. If you're going for a full ride somewhere your GPA is going to prevent that in the T14 no matter your LSAT. Maybe a shot at NWestern ED if you have good work experience. If you're just gunning for entrance you likely will get in most everywhere you can get into with a 173 which, imo, is far more attainable. Don't kill yourself if you can't get a 175. The randomness at that point is brutal.
Also, 175 seems arbitrary. If you're going for a full ride somewhere your GPA is going to prevent that in the T14 no matter your LSAT. Maybe a shot at NWestern ED if you have good work experience. If you're just gunning for entrance you likely will get in most everywhere you can get into with a 173 which, imo, is far more attainable. Don't kill yourself if you can't get a 175. The randomness at that point is brutal.
Last edited by AJordan on Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
Yes it is realistic
SweetTort wrote: call in
-
20170322

- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
164 diagnostic, 174 on the test (but PT's went as high as 180). Anything's possible, fam. Just give this test the time and dedication it deserves. If this needs to be your new full time job, so be it.Mikey wrote:Yes it is realistic
SweetTort wrote: call in
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
Absolutely.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
20170322

- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
^ fuck this guy. Got an unreasonably high score.Alexandros wrote:Absolutely.
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
+179SweetTort wrote:^ fuck this guy. Got an unreasonably high score.Alexandros wrote:Absolutely.
-
20170322

- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
I remember Alexandros flailing about over the summer, and I was knocking out 180's on PT's, like "yeah I got this fam". Then he kicks my ass on the real thing.Mikey wrote:+179SweetTort wrote:^ fuck this guy. Got an unreasonably high score.Alexandros wrote:Absolutely.
Better fucking come to UVA so I can get a rematch. Except in softball this time.
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
SweetTort wrote:I remember Alexandros flailing about over the summer, and I was knocking out 180's on PT's, like "yeah I got this fam". Then he kicks my ass on the real thing.Mikey wrote:+179SweetTort wrote:^ fuck this guy. Got an unreasonably high score.Alexandros wrote:Absolutely.
Better fucking come to UVA so I can get a rematch. Except in softball this time.

- nimbus cloud

- Posts: 536
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:19 am
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
.
Last edited by nimbus cloud on Sun Mar 19, 2017 6:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
.
Last edited by Alexandros on Sun Apr 23, 2017 2:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
One of you 2 please write a study guide before the June LSAT.Alexandros wrote:I owe you my score, fam. Got 90%+ of my study techniques from you.SweetTort wrote:I remember Alexandros flailing about over the summer, and I was knocking out 180's on PT's, like "yeah I got this fam". Then he kicks my ass on the real thing.Mikey wrote:+179SweetTort wrote:^ fuck this guy. Got an unreasonably high score.Alexandros wrote:Absolutely.
Better fucking come to UVA so I can get a rematch. Except in softball this time.
Also Tort you still gotta write that study guide.
- A guy who wants it before the June LSAT
-
20170322

- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
Mikey wrote:One of you 2 please write a study guide before the June LSAT.Alexandros wrote:I owe you my score, fam. Got 90%+ of my study techniques from you.SweetTort wrote:I remember Alexandros flailing about over the summer, and I was knocking out 180's on PT's, like "yeah I got this fam". Then he kicks my ass on the real thing.Mikey wrote:+179SweetTort wrote:^ fuck this guy. Got an unreasonably high score.Alexandros wrote:Absolutely.
Better fucking come to UVA so I can get a rematch. Except in softball this time.
Also Tort you still gotta write that study guide.
- A guy who wants it before the June LSAT
Tbh, I'd be down, but I thought you needed a 177+ to get real TLS guide street cred
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
somedeadman

- Posts: 436
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2016 5:42 pm
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
Very interested as wellMikey wrote:One of you 2 please write a study guide before the June LSAT.Alexandros wrote:I owe you my score, fam. Got 90%+ of my study techniques from you.SweetTort wrote:I remember Alexandros flailing about over the summer, and I was knocking out 180's on PT's, like "yeah I got this fam". Then he kicks my ass on the real thing.Mikey wrote:+179SweetTort wrote:^ fuck this guy. Got an unreasonably high score.Alexandros wrote:Absolutely.
Better fucking come to UVA so I can get a rematch. Except in softball this time.
Also Tort you still gotta write that study guide.
- A guy who wants it before the June LSAT
- PrezRand

- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
Sweet and Alex have been holding out on us. Write us a fucking guide already so we can all go to UVA
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
.
Last edited by Alexandros on Sun Apr 23, 2017 2:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
20170322

- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
Alright, I'll start writing it tonight. Alexandros has to do the same.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
YAYSweetTort wrote:Alright, I'll start writing it tonight. Alexandros has to do the same.
-
YBF-W

- Posts: 52
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 3:06 pm
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
How many months of prep did it take you to make that jump?nimbus cloud wrote:~155 -> 172 here. Yeah, it's realistic.
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
YEEEEEESweetTort wrote:Alright, I'll start writing it tonight. Alexandros has to do the same.
-
dm1683

- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
I sure hope so bc I started out at 160 and I'm hoping for the mid 170s. Most of my difficulties come with LG though so maybe that helps a bit.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- MediocreAtBest

- Posts: 632
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:51 pm
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
A 164 cold diagnostic is really good. I don't see why you couldn't make a 10 point jump on a learnable test like the LSAT as long as you studied hard. Someone with a 140 diagnostic could do well if they put the time and effort in.
My cold diagnostic was a 151, I'm gunning for 173+, I'm pretty confident I'll get there.
My cold diagnostic was a 151, I'm gunning for 173+, I'm pretty confident I'll get there.
- URMSenator52

- Posts: 73
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 2:50 am
Re: 164 on June 2007 -- is 175+ realistic?
Started at 145 diagnostic, now PTing high 160's. In for detailed guide to reach 170's. Prepared for 7-8 months already self prep PS Bibles 10 PT's books etc.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login