Newbie needs your help Forum

[FayRays]

Hi everyone. I am thinking about taking the LSAT on September 2017. I am still in school. I've got like 2 semesters left. My school is pretty hard with heavy science courses, so I won't be able to start preparing until I really graduate hopefully on May 2017.
but I have about a month now and month during Christmas time to get familiar with the lsat test.
I know most people recommend Powerscore books .. But I don't want to use them just yet, I want something good to get me started and be familiar with all the concept ideas.
At my school, they only have McGraw-Hill Education LSAT 2016 , which goes by all the concepts and gives you one example of each concept, it has like 3 sections that cover logic games,reading comprehensions and argument, and then give you 5 practice tests in the end, I am not gonna say it's not a good book, it's kinda helpful, but they don't give a lot of examples so their ideas get lost in the end.

Then there is the problem with the powerscore books, they have the workbook and the guide which one is more useful for a newbie?

I am really hoping you can give me your suggestions for a one month preparation before the real preparation which hopefully will be 9 months from now. For right now I am willing to spend around $100 to $150.

PS: I purchased some arguments and logic books to expand my knowledge and I am planning to read scientific and business articles.

Any advice will be much appreciated. Thank you
or you can just vote

[Deardevil]

Not sure why you would want to postpone the PowerScore books;
I think they cover basics pretty neatly, especially the Logic Games Bible. LSAT Trainer is quite nice, too.
Some people moved on from the Logical Reasoning Bible to Manhattan Prep's LR to further knowledge;
I might have to jump on that bandwagon soon (RIP, wallet). Not sure about RC, but I plan on using Blueprint.

[FayRays]

Not sure why you would want to postpone the PowerScore books;
I think they cover basics pretty neatly, especially the Logic Games Bible. LSAT Trainer is quite nice, too.
Some people moved on from the Logical Reasoning Bible to Manhattan Prep's LR to further knowledge;
I might have to jump on that bandwagon soon (RIP, wallet). Not sure about RC, but I plan on using Blueprint.

Thank you. Because I was thinking If I study them now, I will kind of ruin their questions for later when I am more focused. It's like when people say don't take any old lsat test before you are really prepared and ready.. That's why I am thinking about delaying the powerscore books for later.

[Deardevil]

I see where you're coming from. Blueprint uses modern questions when old ones are more widely preferred.
I'd just skip them. You can still have good gains from reading without doing any questions (besides the general drills that they have).
Perhaps try the free questions that LSAC's website offers. I haven't done them all yet, but they should benefit you.

But honestly, I've been through questions at least twice now, yet still got a lot to learn from them
(minus the easy ones, which I may go back to so that I make sure I'm not losing my edge).
It's almost a given that you'll revisit problems,
whether in blind review or simply to check over incorrect answers to deduce why they're wrong in the first place,
thus causing you to redo the problems, so you won't really be wasting them (sorry for the run-on).

But I agree on putting off on taking a test, much less an old one, until you're comfortable with the material.

[Barack O'Drama]

1) Use the LSAT Trainer for the basics.

2) Powerscore LR/LG Bibles to get proficient at games and LR question types. (Feel free to breeze through the LR bible is you have a good foundational understanding of LR from the Trainer.) During the reading of these start to drill different types of basic logic games. Simple ordering, in-out-grouping, determined assignment...

3) Then read through Manhattan LSAT Trilogy to master the sections. I like their RC prep book a lot! Though, I have heard good things about BP RC.

You don't have to read everything though, as it is important to not confuse quantity vs. quality with prep materials. I went through the Trainer in about 3 weeks, did some drills recommended from the free-study guide on the website.
Then, I breezed through most of the Powerscore LG Bible. (I think it took me a little under two weeks) I am most likely going to forgo most of the LRB due to having a decent enough base of knowledge from The LSAT Trainer. During this point, begin to start drilling Qs by type.

Then lastly, read through the Manhattan books and really get a good at mastering each section and the game/question types therein. This is when you want to start drilling after every chapter, focus on getting games down to -0, and really drilling your weaknesses. Also, mixed review is a good idea to implement during this time as well. Also it is a good idea to start timing your drills during this point.

Last, but not least, begin full-timed practice tests under realistic conditions.

This is what I am doing anyways. MY diagnostic was ~150 and my goal is a 172. I need lots of improvement, but after following this schedule for a little over a month I've seen significant improvement. I have a really good understanding of my strengths and where I need to improve as well.

[FayRays]

1) Use the LSAT Trainer for the basics.

2) Powerscore LR/LG Bibles to get proficient at games and LR question types. (Feel free to breeze through the LR bible is you have a good foundational understanding of LR from the Trainer.) During the reading of these start to drill different types of basic logic games. Simple ordering, in-out-grouping, determined assignment...

3) Then read through Manhattan LSAT Trilogy to master the sections. I like their RC prep book a lot! Though, I have heard good things about BP RC.

You don't have to read everything though, as it is important to not confuse quantity vs. quality with prep materials. I went through the Trainer in about 3 weeks, did some drills recommended from the free-study guide on the website.
Then, I breezed through most of the Powerscore LG Bible. (I think it took me a little under two weeks) I am most likely going to forgo most of the LRB due to having a decent enough base of knowledge from The LSAT Trainer. During this point, begin to start drilling Qs by type.

Then lastly, read through the Manhattan books and really get a good at mastering each section and the game/question types therein. This is when you want to start drilling after every chapter, focus on getting games down to -0, and really drilling your weaknesses. Also, mixed review is a good idea to implement during this time as well. Also it is a good idea to start timing your drills during this point.

Last, but not least, begin full-timed practice tests under realistic conditions.

This is what I am doing anyways. MY diagnostic was ~150 and my goal is a 172. I need lots of improvement, but after following this schedule for a little over a month I've seen significant improvement. I have a really good understanding of my strengths and where I need to improve as well.

I hear what you are saying, I am one of these people who likes to bring 10 books from the library and end up neglecting them all.
I like what you are saying and your plan looks good, thank you for your suggestions. I wonder what power score book should I get. I noticed there are many of them, which are the most useful. The work book or the guides?

I might get the Blue print RC as I've read good reviews about it, have you tried it?

[Barack O'Drama]

1) Use the LSAT Trainer for the basics.

2) Powerscore LR/LG Bibles to get proficient at games and LR question types. (Feel free to breeze through the LR bible is you have a good foundational understanding of LR from the Trainer.) During the reading of these start to drill different types of basic logic games. Simple ordering, in-out-grouping, determined assignment...

3) Then read through Manhattan LSAT Trilogy to master the sections. I like their RC prep book a lot! Though, I have heard good things about BP RC.

You don't have to read everything though, as it is important to not confuse quantity vs. quality with prep materials. I went through the Trainer in about 3 weeks, did some drills recommended from the free-study guide on the website.
Then, I breezed through most of the Powerscore LG Bible. (I think it took me a little under two weeks) I am most likely going to forgo most of the LRB due to having a decent enough base of knowledge from The LSAT Trainer. During this point, begin to start drilling Qs by type.

Then lastly, read through the Manhattan books and really get a good at mastering each section and the game/question types therein. This is when you want to start drilling after every chapter, focus on getting games down to -0, and really drilling your weaknesses. Also, mixed review is a good idea to implement during this time as well. Also it is a good idea to start timing your drills during this point.

Last, but not least, begin full-timed practice tests under realistic conditions.

This is what I am doing anyways. MY diagnostic was ~150 and my goal is a 172. I need lots of improvement, but after following this schedule for a little over a month I've seen significant improvement. I have a really good understanding of my strengths and where I need to improve as well.

I hear what you are saying, I am one of these people who likes to bring 10 books from the library and end up neglecting them all.
I like what you are saying and your plan looks good, thank you for your suggestions. I wonder what power score book should I get. I noticed there are many of them, which are the most useful. The work book or the guides?

I might get the Blue print RC as I've read good reviews about it, have you tried it?

I would get the Powerscore LG and LR. Stay away from their RC, it really is just a waste of money in my opinion. As far as workbooks, I am not too similar with their drill by type books, but I have heard good things. Since they got rid of the Cambridge Drill by type packets, I think the Powerscore ones have been a new go-to.

You might also try getting all the LSAT Actuals and make your own packets. It is more time consuming, but it would save some money, as you should be getting all the LSAT prep test you can for drilling and full-timed practice exams. I've also heard you can torrent them online for free.

I've definitely heard good things about Blueprint RC. I haven't read it, as I am using the Manhattan set for my prep. I think their RC is really good! If I find myself still struggling a bit, I may use BP. I don't see any harm in getting a different take on things.

[FayRays]

1) Use the LSAT Trainer for the basics.

2) Powerscore LR/LG Bibles to get proficient at games and LR question types. (Feel free to breeze through the LR bible is you have a good foundational understanding of LR from the Trainer.) During the reading of these start to drill different types of basic logic games. Simple ordering, in-out-grouping, determined assignment...

3) Then read through Manhattan LSAT Trilogy to master the sections. I like their RC prep book a lot! Though, I have heard good things about BP RC.

You don't have to read everything though, as it is important to not confuse quantity vs. quality with prep materials. I went through the Trainer in about 3 weeks, did some drills recommended from the free-study guide on the website.
Then, I breezed through most of the Powerscore LG Bible. (I think it took me a little under two weeks) I am most likely going to forgo most of the LRB due to having a decent enough base of knowledge from The LSAT Trainer. During this point, begin to start drilling Qs by type.

Then lastly, read through the Manhattan books and really get a good at mastering each section and the game/question types therein. This is when you want to start drilling after every chapter, focus on getting games down to -0, and really drilling your weaknesses. Also, mixed review is a good idea to implement during this time as well. Also it is a good idea to start timing your drills during this point.

Last, but not least, begin full-timed practice tests under realistic conditions.

This is what I am doing anyways. MY diagnostic was ~150 and my goal is a 172. I need lots of improvement, but after following this schedule for a little over a month I've seen significant improvement. I have a really good understanding of my strengths and where I need to improve as well.

I hear what you are saying, I am one of these people who likes to bring 10 books from the library and end up neglecting them all.
I like what you are saying and your plan looks good, thank you for your suggestions. I wonder what power score book should I get. I noticed there are many of them, which are the most useful. The work book or the guides?

I might get the Blue print RC as I've read good reviews about it, have you tried it?

I would get the Powerscore LG and LR. Stay away from their RC, it really is just a waste of money in my opinion. As far as workbooks, I am not too similar with their drill by type books, but I have heard good things. Since they got rid of the Cambridge Drill by type packets, I think the Powerscore ones have been a new go-to.

You might also try getting all the LSAT Actuals and make your own packets. It is more time consuming, but it would save some money, as you should be getting all the LSAT prep test you can for drilling and full-timed practice exams. I've also heard you can torrent them online for free.

I've definitely heard good things about Blueprint RC. I haven't read it, as I am using the Manhattan set for my prep. I think their RC is really good! If I find myself still struggling a bit, I may use BP. I don't see any harm in getting a different take on things.

You know, I think I'll follow your advice on the Powerscore LG and LR.
but I'll get the blue print for RC and tell you what I think about it later
Thank you so much.

[Barack O'Drama]

1) Use the LSAT Trainer for the basics.

2) Powerscore LR/LG Bibles to get proficient at games and LR question types. (Feel free to breeze through the LR bible is you have a good foundational understanding of LR from the Trainer.) During the reading of these start to drill different types of basic logic games. Simple ordering, in-out-grouping, determined assignment...

3) Then read through Manhattan LSAT Trilogy to master the sections. I like their RC prep book a lot! Though, I have heard good things about BP RC.

You don't have to read everything though, as it is important to not confuse quantity vs. quality with prep materials. I went through the Trainer in about 3 weeks, did some drills recommended from the free-study guide on the website.
Then, I breezed through most of the Powerscore LG Bible. (I think it took me a little under two weeks) I am most likely going to forgo most of the LRB due to having a decent enough base of knowledge from The LSAT Trainer. During this point, begin to start drilling Qs by type.

Then lastly, read through the Manhattan books and really get a good at mastering each section and the game/question types therein. This is when you want to start drilling after every chapter, focus on getting games down to -0, and really drilling your weaknesses. Also, mixed review is a good idea to implement during this time as well. Also it is a good idea to start timing your drills during this point.

Last, but not least, begin full-timed practice tests under realistic conditions.

This is what I am doing anyways. MY diagnostic was ~150 and my goal is a 172. I need lots of improvement, but after following this schedule for a little over a month I've seen significant improvement. I have a really good understanding of my strengths and where I need to improve as well.

I hear what you are saying, I am one of these people who likes to bring 10 books from the library and end up neglecting them all.
I like what you are saying and your plan looks good, thank you for your suggestions. I wonder what power score book should I get. I noticed there are many of them, which are the most useful. The work book or the guides?

I might get the Blue print RC as I've read good reviews about it, have you tried it?

I would get the Powerscore LG and LR. Stay away from their RC, it really is just a waste of money in my opinion. As far as workbooks, I am not too similar with their drill by type books, but I have heard good things. Since they got rid of the Cambridge Drill by type packets, I think the Powerscore ones have been a new go-to.

You might also try getting all the LSAT Actuals and make your own packets. It is more time consuming, but it would save some money, as you should be getting all the LSAT prep test you can for drilling and full-timed practice exams. I've also heard you can torrent them online for free.

I've definitely heard good things about Blueprint RC. I haven't read it, as I am using the Manhattan set for my prep. I think their RC is really good! If I find myself still struggling a bit, I may use BP. I don't see any harm in getting a different take on things.

You know, I think I'll follow your advice on the Powerscore LG and LR.
but I'll get the blue print for RC and tell you what I think about it later
Thank you so much.

Of course!

I was actually gonna suggest that. If you try out BP RC definitely let me know how it is. There is a good chance I might go through it just to see if it helps. I am pretty neurotic when it comes to books, so I like to try everything. It has actually hurt me in LSAT prep as far as taking up so much of my time. However, I am really confident that I've found what strategies work best for me, so, in the long run I think it will be worth it.

Don't be afraid to try a few different things and see what ya like! (Just make sure you're drilling to see if what you like works!)

Good luck with your prep

[FayRays]

1) Use the LSAT Trainer for the basics.

2) Powerscore LR/LG Bibles to get proficient at games and LR question types. (Feel free to breeze through the LR bible is you have a good foundational understanding of LR from the Trainer.) During the reading of these start to drill different types of basic logic games. Simple ordering, in-out-grouping, determined assignment...

3) Then read through Manhattan LSAT Trilogy to master the sections. I like their RC prep book a lot! Though, I have heard good things about BP RC.

You don't have to read everything though, as it is important to not confuse quantity vs. quality with prep materials. I went through the Trainer in about 3 weeks, did some drills recommended from the free-study guide on the website.
Then, I breezed through most of the Powerscore LG Bible. (I think it took me a little under two weeks) I am most likely going to forgo most of the LRB due to having a decent enough base of knowledge from The LSAT Trainer. During this point, begin to start drilling Qs by type.

Then lastly, read through the Manhattan books and really get a good at mastering each section and the game/question types therein. This is when you want to start drilling after every chapter, focus on getting games down to -0, and really drilling your weaknesses. Also, mixed review is a good idea to implement during this time as well. Also it is a good idea to start timing your drills during this point.

Last, but not least, begin full-timed practice tests under realistic conditions.

This is what I am doing anyways. MY diagnostic was ~150 and my goal is a 172. I need lots of improvement, but after following this schedule for a little over a month I've seen significant improvement. I have a really good understanding of my strengths and where I need to improve as well.

I hear what you are saying, I am one of these people who likes to bring 10 books from the library and end up neglecting them all.
I like what you are saying and your plan looks good, thank you for your suggestions. I wonder what power score book should I get. I noticed there are many of them, which are the most useful. The work book or the guides?

I might get the Blue print RC as I've read good reviews about it, have you tried it?

I would get the Powerscore LG and LR. Stay away from their RC, it really is just a waste of money in my opinion. As far as workbooks, I am not too similar with their drill by type books, but I have heard good things. Since they got rid of the Cambridge Drill by type packets, I think the Powerscore ones have been a new go-to.

You might also try getting all the LSAT Actuals and make your own packets. It is more time consuming, but it would save some money, as you should be getting all the LSAT prep test you can for drilling and full-timed practice exams. I've also heard you can torrent them online for free.

I've definitely heard good things about Blueprint RC. I haven't read it, as I am using the Manhattan set for my prep. I think their RC is really good! If I find myself still struggling a bit, I may use BP. I don't see any harm in getting a different take on things.

You know, I think I'll follow your advice on the Powerscore LG and LR.
but I'll get the blue print for RC and tell you what I think about it later
Thank you so much.

Of course!

I was actually gonna suggest that. If you try out BP RC definitely let me know how it is. There is a good chance I might go through it just to see if it helps. I am pretty neurotic when it comes to books, so I like to try everything. It has actually hurt me in LSAT prep as far as taking up so much of my time. However, I am really confident that I've found what strategies work best for me, so, in the long run I think it will be worth it.

Don't be afraid to try a few different things and see what ya like! (Just make sure you're drilling to see if what you like works!)

Good luck with your prep

Yeah I have the same problem I like to get all the books and all the types, having them make me feel excited
By the way: I noticed that I hate to read one section only, I jumped from logic games to reasoning. Is that a good or a bad thing?

Best of luck to you too

[Barack O'Drama]

1) Use the LSAT Trainer for the basics.

2) Powerscore LR/LG Bibles to get proficient at games and LR question types. (Feel free to breeze through the LR bible is you have a good foundational understanding of LR from the Trainer.) During the reading of these start to drill different types of basic logic games. Simple ordering, in-out-grouping, determined assignment...

3) Then read through Manhattan LSAT Trilogy to master the sections. I like their RC prep book a lot! Though, I have heard good things about BP RC.

You don't have to read everything though, as it is important to not confuse quantity vs. quality with prep materials. I went through the Trainer in about 3 weeks, did some drills recommended from the free-study guide on the website.
Then, I breezed through most of the Powerscore LG Bible. (I think it took me a little under two weeks) I am most likely going to forgo most of the LRB due to having a decent enough base of knowledge from The LSAT Trainer. During this point, begin to start drilling Qs by type.

Then lastly, read through the Manhattan books and really get a good at mastering each section and the game/question types therein. This is when you want to start drilling after every chapter, focus on getting games down to -0, and really drilling your weaknesses. Also, mixed review is a good idea to implement during this time as well. Also it is a good idea to start timing your drills during this point.

Last, but not least, begin full-timed practice tests under realistic conditions.

This is what I am doing anyways. MY diagnostic was ~150 and my goal is a 172. I need lots of improvement, but after following this schedule for a little over a month I've seen significant improvement. I have a really good understanding of my strengths and where I need to improve as well.

I hear what you are saying, I am one of these people who likes to bring 10 books from the library and end up neglecting them all.
I like what you are saying and your plan looks good, thank you for your suggestions. I wonder what power score book should I get. I noticed there are many of them, which are the most useful. The work book or the guides?

I might get the Blue print RC as I've read good reviews about it, have you tried it?

I would get the Powerscore LG and LR. Stay away from their RC, it really is just a waste of money in my opinion. As far as workbooks, I am not too similar with their drill by type books, but I have heard good things. Since they got rid of the Cambridge Drill by type packets, I think the Powerscore ones have been a new go-to.

You might also try getting all the LSAT Actuals and make your own packets. It is more time consuming, but it would save some money, as you should be getting all the LSAT prep test you can for drilling and full-timed practice exams. I've also heard you can torrent them online for free.

I've definitely heard good things about Blueprint RC. I haven't read it, as I am using the Manhattan set for my prep. I think their RC is really good! If I find myself still struggling a bit, I may use BP. I don't see any harm in getting a different take on things.

You know, I think I'll follow your advice on the Powerscore LG and LR.
but I'll get the blue print for RC and tell you what I think about it later
Thank you so much.

Of course!

I was actually gonna suggest that. If you try out BP RC definitely let me know how it is. There is a good chance I might go through it just to see if it helps. I am pretty neurotic when it comes to books, so I like to try everything. It has actually hurt me in LSAT prep as far as taking up so much of my time. However, I am really confident that I've found what strategies work best for me, so, in the long run I think it will be worth it.

Don't be afraid to try a few different things and see what ya like! (Just make sure you're drilling to see if what you like works!)

Good luck with your prep

Yeah I have the same problem I like to get all the books and all the types, having them make me feel excited
By the way: I noticed that I hate to read one section only, I jumped from logic games to reasoning. Is that a good or a bad thing?

Best of luck to you too

Hey! no problem--

I don't think it's bad form to jump between books. For instance, right now I am reading both chapters from the Manhattan LG and Manhattan LR. Just make sure you're practicing whatever techniques you are learning while they are still fresh in your head.

Good luck as well

[FayRays]

so I just read that the lsat trainer uses real lsat questions
wouldn't that ruin a practice test for me later when I try it.

Now I am confused I think I'll purchase the powerscore books

[Deardevil]

so I just read that the lsat trainer uses real lsat questions
wouldn't that ruin a practice test for me later when I try it. Plus I read that many of the reviews on that book is not authentic

Now I am confused I think I'll purchase the powerscore books

Actually, PS uses real LSAT questions, too (they're old). I believe Kaplan does not, but you're better off with actual ones anyway.

[FayRays]

so I just read that the lsat trainer uses real lsat questions
wouldn't that ruin a practice test for me later when I try it. Plus I read that many of the reviews on that book is not authentic

Now I am confused I think I'll purchase the powerscore books

Actually, PS uses real LSAT questions, too (they're old). I believe Kaplan does not, but you're better off with actual ones anyway.

Ok, I get it now. I also read on Blue Print RC reviews that they use actual lsat questions and newer ones rather the old ones that are used in Manhattan and the Last trainer, so I guess most of them use real questions, there is no way around that.

[Deardevil]

Well, it just means you won't have to do every PT under the sun.
Also, the exam is just a "repeat" of older questions.
Get familiar (like, really intimate) with everything and you should do fine.

[FayRays]

Well, it just means you won't have to do every PT under the sun.
Also, the exam is just a "repeat" of older questions.
Get familiar (like, really intimate) with everything and you should do fine.

yes, I think you are correct, only few people can do all the pt questions out there, I shouldn't worry that much.
If you don't mind me asking, what are you using as preparation materials ? and what are you using for drilling?

[Deardevil]

Currently on PrepTests A, B, and C from the Official LSAT SuperPrep; drilling LR atm.
I plan on taking ~40 PTs, so I'll probably practice from 3X and earlier.

[The LSAT Trainer]

...

[FayRays]

so I just read that the lsat trainer uses real lsat questions
wouldn't that ruin a practice test for me later when I try it.

Now I am confused I think I'll purchase the powerscore books

Hi - this is Mike Kim - author of The LSAT Trainer ---

In general, I think it’s best for me to stay away from discussions about which study guides are best and whatnot --





I wrote the Trainer because I want to be of use to students. I work on my own, with no employees or assistants (that is, if someone were falsifying things, it would have to be me), and the remarkable success of the book is due to the stellar reputation it has developed amongst the students who have used it.

.

For us students who are new; we don't know whom to trust. This is the place to ask questions from other students.




Anyway. I will edit my comment because I am not here to create any issue

[The LSAT Trainer]

Hey - well now it's time for me to edit my comments -- fair enough --I just wanted to try and protect my own reputation -- certainly didn't want to make you feel attacked in any way -- if you are trying to figure out whether the reviews are legit or not, you are absolutely right to come here to ask about it -- MK

[FayRays]

Hey - well now it's time for me to edit my comments -- fair enough --I just wanted to try and protect my own reputation -- certainly didn't want to make you feel attacked in any way -- if you are trying to figure out whether the reviews are legit or not, you are absolutely right to come here to ask about it -- MK

Yes, I edited the quotes as well
Thanx for your efforts to help us all. I also heard good
things about your book can't wait to read it

[brinicolec]

I used the LSAT Trainer and the Bibles (minus the RC Bible). The Trainer uses real questions, yes, but tbh, by the time you get to taking PTs, I highly doubt you'll remember them for the most part (at least I didn't). Besides, redoing questions isn't necessarily a terrible thing as long as you still go through the process. Personally, I'd recommend finding some type of RC book too if you find it to be a more difficult section because I didn't have a RC-specific book and I wish I had. The Trainer does a good job introducing it, but I think a book dedicated to breaking down passages and everything may be beneficial if you can find a quality one!

[FayRays]

I used the LSAT Trainer and the Bibles (minus the RC Bible). The Trainer uses real questions, yes, but tbh, by the time you get to taking PTs, I highly doubt you'll remember them for the most part (at least I didn't). Besides, redoing questions isn't necessarily a terrible thing as long as you still go through the process. Personally, I'd recommend finding some type of RC book too if you find it to be a more difficult section because I didn't have a RC-specific book and I wish I had. The Trainer does a good job introducing it, but I think a book dedicated to breaking down passages and everything may be beneficial if you can find a quality one!

Thank you so much for your advice
I wonder if it has to be Lsat Rc book? I mean what about mcat or dat rc book?

[brinicolec]

Thank you so much for your advice
I wonder if it has to be Lsat Rc book? I mean what about mcat or dat rc book?

I saw someone say something about using a different test RC but I haven't personally looked into it. I just quickly googled MCAT RC ?s and they look similar to the ones on the LSAT, but I'd look into it more if I were you before choosing to buy a book or something like that. I'm planning on trying out the Blueprint LSAT RC book.