June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER Forum
- dvc5240
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:26 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
What exactly are we allowed to discuss on here? I thought the experimental might be section 1. Are we allowed to discuss any weird answer patterns that we noticed as long as there aren't specific questions involved?
- appind
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
somewhatferal wrote:Hopefully the one I didn't finish!dinizdeoliveira wrote:Any clues yet on which LR was the experimental among the 3 LR test takers? All three seemed standard to me. Actually, the whole test was completely unsurprising.
what!! is it even possible that you run out of time
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 6&t=119285dvc5240 wrote:What exactly are we allowed to discuss on here? I thought the experimental might be section 1. Are we allowed to discuss any weird answer patterns that we noticed as long as there aren't specific questions involved?
- magnum_law
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 5:32 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC
In my opinion... the first LR was cake. LG was cake. LR2 was the probably the hardest LR (hoping this one is experimental), LR3 was average with a few hard ones, RC was fucking brutal.
In my opinion... the first LR was cake. LG was cake. LR2 was the probably the hardest LR (hoping this one is experimental), LR3 was average with a few hard ones, RC was fucking brutal.
-
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:00 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
God... something bad happened to me with the games. Everyone is saying they were so easy and somehow I really fucked one up and had to guess on every fucking question bc I didn't have time to finish. So I guessed on like 5 questions for the third game lOLOL FUCK MEEEEE. I'm so disappointed. Rest I thought was relatively standard. I had 3 LR sections.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BirdLawExpert
- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 6:09 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Anyone last year remember the magic page number for scores? Wasn't it something like 273?
Just wanted to give the new people something to look forward to.
Just wanted to give the new people something to look forward to.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2015 4:39 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
When did everyone's test end? How long ago?
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 12:30 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Anybody else have 2 RC?
- Blueprint Mithun
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 1:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Regardless of how you might feel about your performance, congrats to everyone who made it through the test! 

- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
this happened to me in December (guessed on 5 in game 3) and I still scored in my target range!carasrook wrote:God... something bad happened to me with the games. Everyone is saying they were so easy and somehow I really fucked one up and had to guess on every fucking question bc I didn't have time to finish. So I guessed on like 5 questions for the third game lOLOL FUCK MEEEEE. I'm so disappointed. Rest I thought was relatively standard. I had 3 LR sections.

-
- Posts: 2322
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:35 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I'm hoping barking birds is the experimental? Anyone confirm?
Thank god no weird games. At point it was hard to focus because I was so glad games was over. I found reading comp hard except the CFCs
Thank god no weird games. At point it was hard to focus because I was so glad games was over. I found reading comp hard except the CFCs
Last edited by Keilz on Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:00 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
<3333 just what i needed to hear, let's hope that's the case for me!!proteinshake wrote:this happened to me in December (guessed on 5 in game 3) and I still scored in my target range!carasrook wrote:God... something bad happened to me with the games. Everyone is saying they were so easy and somehow I really fucked one up and had to guess on every fucking question bc I didn't have time to finish. So I guessed on like 5 questions for the third game lOLOL FUCK MEEEEE. I'm so disappointed. Rest I thought was relatively standard. I had 3 LR sections.
-
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:00 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I got out at like 5:15californiabarprep wrote:When did everyone's test end? How long ago?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:24 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Yeah, I was mistaken. This is what mine was. LR2 was the hardest -- my guess for the experimental one. The last question was something about a movie executive? I don't remember clearly; I was guessing. Anyone with two LR sections have that question?magnum_law wrote:I had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC
In my opinion... the first LR was cake. LG was cake. LR2 was the probably the hardest LR (hoping this one is experimental), LR3 was average with a few hard ones, RC was fucking brutal.
Last edited by somewhatferal on Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2322
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:35 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I had that test version and am hoping the same.. Also had barking birds lolsomewhatferal wrote:Yeah, I was mistaken. This is what mine was. LR2 was the hardest -- my guess for the experimental one. Last questions was something about a movie executive? I don't remember clearly; I was guessing. Anyone with two LR sections have that question?magnum_law wrote:I had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC
In my opinion... the first LR was cake. LG was cake. LR2 was the probably the hardest LR (hoping this one is experimental), LR3 was average with a few hard ones, RC was fucking brutal.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 5:08 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
RC.......always a struggle.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:24 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I had a bit of trouble with the CFC's and Art Patronage passages. Hopefully not enough to knock me out of the -2 range.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2322
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:35 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Wow I guess not many people finished their test yet...or they did and are with family and friends and not running to be on TLS lol
-
- Posts: 2322
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:35 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I had trouble with the art and the tokens.somewhatferal wrote:I had a bit of trouble with the CFC's and Art Patronage passages. Hopefully not enough to knock me out of the -2 range.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:24 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Oh yeah, the tokens. I might have missed one there too.
- audaz
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 6:11 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I had LR LG LR LR RC... one of the LR was super hard... someone please tell me the cows was a real LR.. I can't remember anything about the hard LR
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dvc5240
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:26 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Sorry couldn't tell from the rules... Are we allowed to discuss how frequent particular answers were like within a total section ?
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
You wouldn't want to speculate on something like that anywaysdvc5240 wrote:Sorry couldn't tell from the rules... Are we allowed to discuss how frequent particular answers were like within a total section ?
-
- Posts: 2322
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:35 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I had the same as you but don't remember cows? Barking birds ring a bell? Someone else said movie exec?audaz wrote:I had LR LG LR LR RC... one of the LR was super hard... someone please tell me the cows was a real LR.. I can't remember anything about the hard LR
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
BTW I'm pretty sure that even if you had the same order of shit and had 3 LRs, your LR sections could still be in different orders.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login